S
StephiePea
Guest
And why faith is faithBTW- believing doesn’t mean understanding, somethings just can’t be understood, but isn’t that why God is God!!
peace
And why faith is faithBTW- believing doesn’t mean understanding, somethings just can’t be understood, but isn’t that why God is God!!
peace
Like in a cafeteria, it is a person who goes along and picks and chooses what they like and what look good to them… It is good for you to eat your vegies even if you don’t like them The Church knows what is good for us.What is a cafeteria catholic?
you didn’t mean that personally did you?especially when paraphrasing past presidents and California Catholics…
Great response. I am glad to have you as a fellow Catholic. Your faith is an inspiration to everyone.I am a new convert 2002. Yes, I believe everything that the church teaches by its Divine Authority. There must be absolute truth. We can’t pick and choose. This logic is a big part of why I converted to Catholicism wholeheartedly!!
BTW- believing doesn’t mean understanding, somethings just can’t be understood, but isn’t that why God is God!!
peace
You are not required to believe in apparitions at all, but it is not a very Catholic thing not to.No
I “still” dont belive 100% in the bodily assumption of Mary, sometimes I find myself doubting, I dont belive in some of her aparitions, or her being co redemptrix and mediatrix of all graces at all.
or the scapular, the medal, or worshipping Jesus or Mary’s heart.
But I think only her assumption is dogma of all those I mentioned above.
I dont have a problem at all with worshipping Jesus or asking the virgin Mary to pray for me, maybe the problem is that no one taught me the teology behind it, but worshipping body parts looks weird to me.You are not required to believe in apparitions at all, but it is not a very Catholic thing not to.
You must believe She is Mediatrix of All Graces, for that is already defined by the Church.
You are not required to believe in the Scapular or medal, as far as I know, but to not do so would be similar to not believing in the Rosary…
No one says to worship the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Why would you be opposed to worshipping Christ?
Why do you doubt the Assumption?
What an awesome summation! That is exactly what I went through when I converted from agnosticism. It’s amazing how your mind can grasp things if you just open it a crack. Otherwise, you’re staring at the same 4 walls and never seeing past.Good Posts!
We are compelled to believe dogma and that which is taught infallibly(sp?), not the opions of some members of the Church. We don’t need to understand to believe. Struggling with something doesn’t mean we don’t believe it. I tell my CCD students “Don’t seek to understand so you can believe, believe, so that you may understand.” Our tiny intellect can’t necessary grasp all of 2,000 years of divinely inspired wisdom.
God bless
I meant nothing uncharitable to either President Clinton (the “definition of is” is just one of the quotes I have heard) or California Catholics (I am one!). In regards to the the latter, I have found that a lot of the Catholics in California tend to play fast and loose with the Catechism…especially when it comes to their “conscience” trumping teachings they don’t care for.hmmmmm pretty interesting quote at the bottom of your post… about the splinter and beam i mean… especially when paraphrasing past presidents and California Catholics…
There may be a few thousand years of tradition but threre have only been a few hundred years in which human knowledge and experience was advanced enough to require alterations to tradition in order to make it tenable. Unfortunately, it is too easy to worship the tradition instead of using the tradition as a growing and developing means of seeing God.Well, do you believe everything your math teacher teaches…
Or are you smarter than a few thousand years of tradition?
I genuinely and honestly have no idea what you are trying to say.there have only been a few hundred years in which human knowledge and experience was advanced enough to require alterations to tradition in order to make it tenable.
The golden era of the Church Fathers was also one in which very, very few people were educated at all. So the depth of education might have been greater (we could argue that as well), but the breadth was much narrower.My observation is that people are becoming very dumb as time passes. The golden era of the Church Fathers was one in which educated people understood Greek, were familiar with logic and rhetoric, history and philosophy, even advanced mathematics.
Bravo! :clapping:There are a few things the Catholic Church teaches that I don’t “agree” with in the sense that I have yet to see a pursuasive argument to support them. I can’t really claim to believe them. However, I trust that the Church is wiser than I - and I believe in its docterinal infallability (which doesn’t necessaraly mean it’s theological reasoning is right, just that the answers are).
I’m not quite sold on birth control - though I’m coming around a bit, in part with help from the Pope’s “Love and Responsibility” - but I will obey the Church on the mater none the less.