J
Jump4Joy
Guest
Is Revelation the same as the rapture?
Last edited:
Sorry to sidetrack the thread. But Ironically, the Catholic Church is continually accused of being full of man made traditions. Haha. You can ask 10 different Protestants ministers or theologians what the end times look like and get 10 different answers. Simple by product of private interpretation of scripture and lack of authority to establish doctrine.No.
The Rapture as commonly understood is a 19th century tradition of men.
Catholics don’t “believe” in man-made fallible traditions.
The problem with this is that, in Noah’s time, the people who were “taken up” are clearly the evil people who were wiped away by the floods. The surrounding passages in Matthew make this comparison explicitly clear.36
“But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son,* but the Father alone.
37
For as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
38
In [those] days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day that Noah entered the ark.
39
They did not know until the flood came and carried them all away. So will it be [also] at the coming of the Son of Man.
There is no Catholic doctine on the Rapture. It is a purely man made future event that is not in scripture!Not you personally. Is that Catholic doctrine?
To the best of my recollection, I’ve never heard or seen the word “Rapture” in a Catholic context at all.Not you personally. Is that Catholic doctrine?
Well, if by “rapture” you mean the dead will rise, and Christ will come in the clouds and judge the quick and the dead, sure.Is Revelation the same as the rapture?
Below is an article from Catholic Answers that explains the history of The Rapture. The Catholic Church does not believe in the Rapture.Is Revelation the same as the rapture?
Indeed. Thanks, BartholomewB.In some languages, though not, I think, in English, one of the eucharistic prayers includes the words (spoken by the people), “Grant us the fellowship of the elect.” Nobody – not even a Calvinist – can possibly know in advance that they’re one of the elect, but naturally we all hope to be.
I think there are many reasons for this, some less strange than others. One of the most obvious, at least to me, has its source in the rather Puritanical attitude of the reformers. In trying to rid the Church of abuses, they tended to try too hard to ‘clean house’ by purifying her of what were seen as distractions from devotion, i.e. statues, incense, elaborate music, &c. In the process, they threw out the baby with the bath, and consequently have regarded anything over and above hard pews, long faces and the bare white walls of the meeting-house with suspicion ever since. It is a small step from such self-righteousness to a knee-jerk, automatic, unthinking equation of oneself with ‘the elect’ and Catholics with, at best, ignorant deluded souls and, at worst, with apostate servants of the Anti-Christ. Another reason which I have long suspected, and which is far more subtle and interesting from a psychological standpoint, is: It is just possible that many Protestants, especially those who have studied Church history in depth, actually do realise that the RCC is the true Church, but they have become so invested in their particular brand of Protestantism that they are either 1) afraid to speak out on the truth, or 2) are fearful of how their Protestant relatives and friends would treat them, or 3) they have prominent positions in their particular denomination, and do not wish to surrender the status and material rewards that come with such positions. I hate to attribute such crass and unreasonable motives to my non-Catholic brethren, but I have thought about this quite a bit since I converted to Catholicism twenty-two years ago, and I strongly feel they play a major part in much of the anti-Catholic rhetoric we encounter far too often.Why do Protestants think they are the true church and Catholics have Christianity wrong? Like we added more books, but Protestantism is the purest Christian faith.
I don’t buy this argument. Anyone who has studied Church history in depth is obviously passionate about Christianity and will know their everlasting soul is all that matters, regardless of what others think or what status or rewards they have to give up.It is just possible that many Protestants, especially those who have studied Church history in depth, actually do realise that the RCC is the true Church, but they have become so invested in their particular brand of Protestantism that they are either 1) afraid to speak out on the truth, or 2) are fearful of how their Protestant relatives and friends would treat them, or 3) they have prominent positions in their particular denomination, and do not wish to surrender the status and material rewards that come with such positions.