Do you feel offended by people who come to the CC dressed as if they were at a barbeque in their backyard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wisdomseeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
When was the last time, even in a traditional parish, you heard ANYTHING ever preached about modesty or decorum?
The last time I heard anything preached on this was many years ago when the pastor personally showed what was acceptable and what wasn’t from within the congregation itself. The following week he apologized as apparently many had taken offense. This was in a no-nonsense OF community, by the way.
 
I am not asking anyone to dress up modestly for me. I am asking everyone to dress up, at least a complete dress when going to the House of God. as it too much to ask?
show some respect for the House of the Almighty.
shorts, women wearing pants and bowing with their backs to the people. not a very nice scene to look at it.
Although I’m not offended, just distracted, sometimes I wonder what some cleavage-displaying women were thinking as they dressed for Church.
 
There ia a huge variety of dress styles at my huge parish. Many older women in their seventies and eighties wear dresses that are at least 30 years old and totally out of style. Does this bother me - NO - I think it’s kind of sweet and quirky. Most women from their 20’s through their 60’s wear chinos or nice jeans and blouses. Men wear jeans or chinos and polo shirts. Let’s face it folks, women primarily dress to impress each other - that is a fact that is hard to deny.

As Catholics we try to live our lives “everyday” as Jesus taught. I’m just not a Catholic on Sunday’s. If I wanted to be part of a sect that doesn’t “live” their faith 24/7 then I would become a Methodist, etc. Part of the beauty and heart of being a Catholic is that it defines who we are. Going to Mass is part and parcel of our lives, it isn’t a one day a week special occasion. I don’t think the Lord is offended by the way people dress at Mass. It is between God and the individual. I believe that the Lord is pleased when we attend the Celebration. On Wednesday evenings our parish has dinner for the homeless. We also have a clothes give away so those in need may find some clothing to use. Do you really think that our Lord cares that the woman with no teeth and 4 little kids isn’t wearing a long skirt and blouse that covers her arms and neck to Wednesday evening mass? For those men and women who adhere to the notion that women shouldn’t be **allowed ****to wear pants, I ask why?******pants are, in most cases, far more modest than skirts… I refuse to be part of the fashion police. Live and let live and get that log out of your eye!:cool:
 
do you know the history of women begining to wear pants like man? do we have to wear them in the House of God? or is this a reflection of a rebellion attitude towards God?
The Church is Universal and there are many cultures foreign to what you belong to in which women (and men) have always worn pants. They wore it before the Jesuit missionaries came and they continued to wear it after they converted. I cannot imagine how that could be construed as a “rebellion against God” or a “rebellious attitude”. Christ came to save all people, not just those in the western world who wore dresses or skirts…before or after conversion.

I realize that “wearing dresses” is part of your culture, but please be charitable and respectful towards Catholics of other cultures that differ from your own.
 
The last time I heard anything preached on this was many years ago when the pastor personally showed what was acceptable and what wasn’t from within the congregation itself. The following week he apologized as apparently many had taken offense. This was in a no-nonsense OF community, by the way.
My father-in-law is a deacon that gave a very non-judgemental homily where he mentioned dressing to honor God at Mass, especially in the area of modesty. That week he got chewed out by the priest because the more feminist elements in that parish objected. He then had to have all his homilies edited.
 
here is my only 2 cents worth:

iam not at Mass to concentrate on what other people where. its not my place to tell people what they can and cannot wear to Mass. iam there to worship God, and listen to His representative, the priest. i do not allow myself to be distracted by what other people are doing. if they wear shorts, well then they wear shorts. its not going to change my life or upset me as to what they wear. i have better things to do with my time then to worry about what others are wearing and doing. God comes first and foremost in my life, and everything else is secondary. and worrying or getting all worked up or disgusted at what others are doing or wearing is not going to consume my time at Mass. iam there for God. not for man or what man is wearing or doing.
 
I wonder how many of these people would go to receive knighthood from the Queen wearing what they wear in Mass. Christ knights us all when we receive that most Holy Body, and yet here we come as if we’ve just been sitting on the couch eating crisps all night. I seriously doubt anyone from a republic or a democracy would approach his president or prime minister at a public event without formal attire. Since Christ is the very King of the Universe and the whole Mass centers around His Presence, we might at least go as far as we go for Elizabeth II or Barack Obama.

Perhaps respect for great names is just not important to most people “these days” (not that our date in chronology has anything to do with … anything!).
The culture of dressing to impress is anything but modest. People dress nicely when they meet the President because they want to fit in and seem important. Formal attire and nice clothes have never been about being holy and modest. Dress is purely cultural. If I go to a mass in a third world country wearing a fancy suit while everyone else is dressed in tattered clothes then that is not moddest of me. Even if I dress in a nice polo and a good pair of jeans I am still dressing way above my brothers and sisters and displaying my wealthy culture. Clothing is and has always been about outward appearance and social status. The Church says to dress modestly, not to dress nicely and part of that reason is because dressing nicely can easily fall into the area of being immoddest.

A woman who wears extravgent diamond trimmed gowns to an inner city parish every week would be acting immoddestly. Moddesty isn’t just about covering up certain body parts it is about respecting those around you and treating them as equals. So if a man wears an Armani suit to parish where everyone else wears t-shirts he isn’t the one to be exalted as this thread seems to imply. Moddesty is not something purely for the sexual realm, it applies to other social aspects such as wealth, status, athleticism, and even our level of closeness with God. It is far worse if someone walks into church with moddest clothing but an immoddest heart and looks down on a girl with a low-cut top than if a girl with a low-cut top walks into church and silently frets over her clothing choice.
 
My father-in-law is a deacon that gave a very non-judgemental homily where he mentioned dressing to honor God at Mass, especially in the area of modesty. That week he got chewed out by the priest because the more feminist elements in that parish objected. He then had to have all his homilies edited.
Bummer.
 
I am not asking anyone to dress up modestly for me. I am asking everyone to dress up, at least a complete dress when going to the House of God. as it too much to ask?
show some respect for the House of the Almighty.
shorts, women wearing pants and bowing with their backs to the people. not a very nice scene to look at it.
Men wearing open shirts on a bare chest bother me as well.
Please understand where I’m coming from: before my conversion I used to dress like a prostitute and act worse. Since I converted, dressing modestly in general and reverently when going to Mass is very important to me.
I am a married woman and my body belongs to my husband and is not for other people to see, especially in the house of the Lord.
I’m not saying that all women should do as I do, but I don’t wear tight clothes, see through, skirts must be at least under the knee, shirts come down almost mid-thigh and the sizes larger than my size, I wear at least 2 layers of shirts in the summer…
I’m a slender athletic woman but you can’t tell by the way I dress and I am pleased with that. My husband also appreciates me not being a source of temptation to other men. I try to keep up with liturgical colors as much as possible.
 
Men wearing open shirts on a bare chest bother me as well.
Please understand where I’m coming from: before my conversion I used to dress like a prostitute and act worse. Since I converted, dressing modestly in general and reverently when going to Mass is very important to me.
I am a married woman and my body belongs to my husband and is not for other people to see, especially in the house of the Lord.
I’m not saying that all women should do as I do, but I don’t wear tight clothes, see through, skirts must be at least under the knee, shirts come down almost mid-thigh and the sizes larger than my size, I wear at least 2 layers of shirts in the summer…
I’m a slender athletic woman but you can’t tell by the way I dress and I am pleased with that. My husband also appreciates me not being a source of temptation to other men. I try to keep up with liturgical colors as much as possible.
thank you for this. you are a good example for others and not a scandal.
 
Men wearing open shirts on a bare chest bother me as well.
Please understand where I’m coming from: before my conversion I used to dress like a prostitute and act worse. Since I converted, dressing modestly in general and reverently when going to Mass is very important to me.
I am a married woman and my body belongs to my husband and is not for other people to see, especially in the house of the Lord.
I’m not saying that all women should do as I do, but I don’t wear tight clothes, see through, skirts must be at least under the knee, shirts come down almost mid-thigh and the sizes larger than my size, I wear at least 2 layers of shirts in the summer…
I’m a slender athletic woman but you can’t tell by the way I dress and I am pleased with that. My husband also appreciates me not being a source of temptation to other men. I try to keep up with liturgical colors as much as possible.
Nice post.
 
Poor people in ancient times, and even renaisance times did not have nice clothing. The time period has been overly romanticized by works of fiction. In truth most people barely bathed and their clothes were washed infrequently. A typical Catholic congregation would not be filled with people in victorian style clothing because most people couldn’t afford that type of clothing. You are asking people to ascribe to a cultural norm that only ever existed in the 150 years and only in limited areas of the world. The fact is that the Church only asks for culturally modest dress and any offense you take to women wearing pants, which are considered to be modest in our culture, is completely personal. You litterally invented your own standards and are expecting people to adhere to them.
Reading a couple of these post on this topic just reeks of the American mentality “don’t tell me what to do or wear”.
In the first centuries of the Church, people had to worry about not being caught celebrating mass, so it would make sence to dress causal norm in order to not raise suspicion. I would not order somone to dress to “high standards” but just because you can’t afford a dress shirt and a tie does not mean you have to go to mass with a t-shirt with an image of beer bottel with a half naked chick. If a female can’t afford a nice outfit, but yet comes in with so much cleavage expesosed and pants so tight that it creates a
“camel toe” where is the justification in that? You really don’t have to be educated, it’s common sence! But in part I do blame part in the Church for not fully educating on what really happens at the mass. Women comming into mass exposed can lead other to sin by lusting, she is also held responsible for that sin because she has assisted a brother in Christ to sin.
 
Reading a couple of these post on this topic just reeks of the American mentality “don’t tell me what to do or wear”.
In the first centuries of the Church, people had to worry about not being caught celebrating mass, so it would make sence to dress causal norm in order to not raise suspicion. I would not order somone to dress to “high standards” but just because you can’t afford a dress shirt and a tie does not mean you have to go to mass with a t-shirt with an image of beer bottel with a half naked chick. If a female can’t afford a nice outfit, but yet comes in with so much cleavage expesosed and pants so tight that it creates a
“camel toe” where is the justification in that? You really don’t have to be educated, it’s common sence! But in part I do blame part in the Church for not fully educating on what really happens at the mass. Women comming into mass exposed can lead other to sin by lusting, she is also held responsible for that sin because she has assisted a brother in Christ to sin.
very well said. now, if one have money to buy an indescent cloth, why not instead use the money to by descent clothes? this is not about the money, this is about being ashamed of being a Catholic. just like so many outhere dont even want to do the sign of the Cross anymore.
 
Reading a couple of these post on this topic just reeks of the American mentality “don’t tell me what to do or wear”.
In the first centuries of the Church, people had to worry about not being caught celebrating mass, so it would make sence to dress causal norm in order to not raise suspicion. I would not order somone to dress to “high standards” but just because you can’t afford a dress shirt and a tie does not mean you have to go to mass with a t-shirt with an image of beer bottel with a half naked chick. If a female can’t afford a nice outfit, but yet comes in with so much cleavage expesosed and pants so tight that it creates a
“camel toe” where is the justification in that? You really don’t have to be educated, it’s common sence! But in part I do blame part in the Church for not fully educating on what really happens at the mass. Women comming into mass exposed can lead other to sin by lusting, she is also held responsible for that sin because she has assisted a brother in Christ to sin.
That’s probably more of my fault than the poster quoted. I asked (noting that it wasn’t the same thing) when it was that people started actually dressing up for Church. I tried to indicate it was mainly a curiosity thing on my part because I know from history that traditionally common folks didn’t own “Dress” clothes. I am not trying to use the past to justify what we do today or say “don’t tell me how to dress”. Standards aren’t the same now as they were then. But I also wanted to point out for about the first 1700 years of the Church, people didn’t “dress up.” They couldn’t. In the history of the Church, it’s a relatively new concept. And some people can’t afford to buy special Sunday clothes and dress up (I am one of them. I have nice/modest clothes, but I wear them to work too… I need to buy things that have several possible uses. And yes, they are a little worn).

I think people here are talking about two different things. Dressing “nice” as in “to the nines” and dressing “modestly.” They are two entirely different things. Someone dressed modestly need not be dressed up. Someone dressed up can be far from modest.
 
very well said. now, if one have money to buy an indescent cloth, why not instead use the money to by descent clothes? this is not about the money, this is about being ashamed of being a Catholic. just like so many outhere dont even want to do the sign of the Cross anymore.
Huh? How did we get from women need to wear dresses instead of pants like a man to now they are ashamed of being Catholic? Just like people who don’t want to do the sign of the Cross anymore??? Now I’m super confused how that leap is made?:confused:
 
very well said. now, if one have money to buy an indescent cloth, why not instead use the money to by descent clothes? this is not about the money, this is about being ashamed of being a Catholic. just like so many outhere dont even want to do the sign of the Cross anymore.
For me it’s about money. I think that’s why I start getting a little upset when people say my wearing pants is bad. What’s next, my shoes aren’t good enough either because I use a sharpie to color in the scuffed up spots (to make them last longer)? I have to wear dress pants at work. I don’t have a lot of money to spend on clothes, so my work clothes (which are my better clothes) are often my Church clothes. I do own one skirt–I bought it for Easter, along with a pink jacket, a few years ago. Typically I wear that same skirt every Sunday from about April to September. It’s a bit embarrassing, but it’s what I have. In fall and winter, I wear my work dress slacks to stay warm. It just makes me distressed to essentially be told that I am not good enough for God because I prefer to spend money on a roof over my head, heat and groceries rather than clothes.
 
I am not asking anyone to dress up modestly for me. I am asking everyone to dress up, at least a complete dress when going to the House of God. as it too much to ask?
show some respect for the House of the Almighty.
shorts, women wearing pants and bowing with their backs to the people. not a very nice scene to look at it.
No. I’m there to focus on other things.

And frankly, it’s not my business.

Pax,
OA
 
I’m all for dressing modestly. But dressing up is asking too much, it makes the Church look elitist instead of a moralist.
 
I think people here are talking about two different things. Dressing “nice” as in “to the nines” and dressing “modestly.” They are two entirely different things. Someone dressed modestly need not be dressed up. Someone dressed up can be far from modest.
I think this is the problem with all of these threads. The issues of dressing up and dressing modestly always get all mixed up.

I think pretty much everyone here would agree that one should dress modestly even if we don’t all agree on an exact definition of what that means. It also seems complaining about immodest dressing is an awful lot of “preaching to the choir” around here.

The issue of how “nice” one should dress for Mass seems a bit more contentious.

I just wish these threads could stick to one issue or the other instead of mixing them all together.
 
And of course the issue of dressing so you don’t cause one to sin…is usually clear but not always. I had a guy at work staring at my chest…and I was wearing a large turtleneck sweater…What are you going to do?🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top