Do you prefer the Gloria being sung by everyone or by choir mostly with responses from congregation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3DOCTORS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
3

3DOCTORS

Guest
My question is probably longer than this first post! :o

I really like to sing the entire Gloria because I feel it’s my big chance to praise God. Not that the choirs who have arrangements are bad, but I want to be a part of it.

How about you?🙂
 
I agree. I don’t know how it is supposed to be, but I definitely prefer when I’m able to sing/praise along.
 
I went to a different church today than the church I usually attend, and the Gloria was completely different. Not the words, but the music and the arrangement.

At my church, the choir sings, and then we sing in response “Gloria,Gloria, in excelsis Deo.”

However, at the church I attended today, the entirety was sung by the priest in more of a traditional chant, no Latin used just English.

Both are beautiful, but quite different.
 
While I prefer to sing the entire Gloria, I know that it’s perfectly acceptable, per the GIRM, for the choir to sing it alone. I intensely dislike a responsorial Gloria, since that’s not how the Gloria is written.
 
Nothing replaces praising God with your own voice. In my church the congregation sings the chorus and the choir sings the other parts. Personally I sing the whole thing, albeit a tad bit softer during the choirs part. I LOVE the Gloria hymn.
 
My question is probably longer than this first post! :o

I really like to sing the entire Gloria because I feel it’s my big chance to praise God. Not that the choirs who have arrangements are bad, but I want to be a part of it.

How about you?🙂
I feel the Gloria has been taken away from the people and turned into a choir number. I miss singing it and I have a mediocre voice so I really feel like all the angels, saints, and choir all join in —the rest of us have a few responses.
 
I like a through-composed Gloria, that is, one without a refrain. I intensely dislike refrains; it just seems like a very cheesy, overt, trying-too-hard way to get everyone to “participate.”

I couldn’t care less whether there is congregational participation or not. Congregational participation is nice, but then we get stuck into that “participate-a-thon” mode where it becomes practically anathema to have occasional or semi-regular difficult Renaissance polyphonic settings, which I immensely enjoy, and which of course only the choir is usually trained well enough to sing.

Mass becomes too much like a school field day when we are expected to do everything at all times. I certainly think that congregational participation should be fostered in a reasonable and understandable way, but to always sacrifice musical beauty in the name of participation is a kick in the teeth. That is not to say that simpler settings cannot be beautiful, but nothing quite beats an occasional polyphonic setting; some diehard “participation promoters” shudder at that, I find, because it necessitates the majority of the people remaining quiet.

In short, I think balance is key. There is nothing wrong with congregational participation, and I won’t argue against it, but when it becomes the kind of shove-it-down-your-throat “PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION” environment, it’s cheesy and tends to make many people not want to participate in anything at all.

On a related note, I think we Catholics in the recent past have almost turned congregational participation at Mass into a God in and of itself to be worshiped, and I think we have to get out of that theme.

That’s my two cents.

🙂
 
Since not too many people in the church sing along with anything, I sing everything. I don’t think anyone minds. If they do, I’ll just claim it’s because I’m a newbie and no one has told me otherwise. I have no way of knowing no way or the other anyway.
 
I prefer choir. The choir in my church is wonderful. I just like it to sound glorious no matter who sings, never dragging along, but glorious, and usually the classic composers’ glorias do that best for my taste.
 
While I prefer to sing the entire Gloria, I know that it’s perfectly acceptable, per the GIRM, for the choir to sing it alone. I intensely dislike a responsorial Gloria, since that’s not how the Gloria is written.
You’re right. It’s so crazy up to rearrange the texts of the Mass and call it licit.
 
I prefer just singing the responses and the choir handling the rest. The reason is, I’m not good at singing and I get more out of it if I close my eyes (or gaze at the crucifix) and listen. The response is in a tune that I can actually carry, sort of…:o

Another option could be a verbal recitation - like during daily mass on Feast days. I wouldn’t sound as wonderful but it would allow the tone deaf (me!) to fully participate without ruining it for others. 😉
 
There’s a few good settings that have a solid congregational part at the beginning and end, and a polyphonic middle section for the choir. Some have congregational responses on “Have mercy on us” and “Recieve our prayer” during the middle section, some don’t.

But either way, it’s a nice way of doing it. I really like it.

Here’s a good one by a professor at Noterdame:

PDF Mp3 simulation (while you look at the Mp3)
 
There’s a few good settings that have a solid congregational part at the beginning and end, and a polyphonic middle section for the choir. Some have congregational responses on “Have mercy on us” and “Recieve our prayer” during the middle section, some don’t.

But either way, it’s a nice way of doing it. I really like it.

Here’s a good one by a professor at Noterdame:

PDF Mp3 simulation (while you look at the Mp3)
By the way, that setting is free for anyone to use, pm me if you’re interested. I know where to get a more high quality score for the whole Mass, not just the gloria.
 
I love singing the Gloria! The choir does sound alot better than the regular congregation but I really feel good when I off-tune sing the Gloria!
 
I feel the Gloria has been taken away from the people and turned into a choir number.
I’m with you. Here, when the choir sings, most people dont sing along. But, when there is no choir, *most * people sings the Glory.

There are different ways to sing the Glory, but I have a few favorites, and once you start singing, whether you sing horrible or not, you feel like you’re lifted with the angles with trumpets and…and wow, can’t explain. lol. Same feeling with the Sanctus before the Eucharist.
 
We use the St. Anne setting and the entire congregation sings. It’s quite beautiful and upbeat 🙂
 
We use this one at my parish. We all sing it.

adoremus.org/hymns/29%20Gloria.mp3
Ummm… that is beautiful. Absolutely. 🙂

Today at the church I attended (as I posted different than my usual) this is VERY like how the Priest sang the Gloria only he sang in English.

I wish I could find an mp3 to share and gather thoughts on how it is sang at the church I regularly attend. Mass sometimes seems rather disjointed there because it doesn’t flow… the Mass seems like a mix of trying to be traditional with more modern music at times thrown in (song arrangement) and then other times more traditional music.

Today was really beautiful because it all seemed to flow rather well.
 
Since the new translation came out we’ve been singing the Geoffrey Angeles setting of Mass. His Gloria is responsorial but I’ve noticed that since Easter the choir doesn’t sing it that way. They sing it through without the responses. We’re just learning to sing along – they haven’t told the congregation which setting they’re using, I just asked them what setting they’d opted for when they were still practicing. I wish they’d opted for the simple chants from the Roman Missal – but you can’t play guitar for those.:rolleyes: Matter of fact, the choir director admitted that she had no idea what that section of the new hymnal was about. She didn’t bother to look at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top