Do you prefer the Gloria being sung by everyone or by choir mostly with responses from congregation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3DOCTORS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I admit that I don’t like most newer settings of the Gloria especially for the congregation. I do enjoy chanting the Gloria in Latin when certain parishes do it and I love many of the choral polyphonic settings. Most of the music is so beautiful and uplifting, it sounds like angels singing from above… well at least if the choir is decent. haha! Otherwise, I prefer just reciting it to hearing a bad choir or singing a mediocre musical setting for congregation.
 
What’s more important is that it is done well. If there is a great choir to sing the Gloria (and other parts of the Ordinary) to a polyphonic setting then that is great. But if the setting is congregational then we should all participate - I just hate it when everyone stands there like lemons not joining in - for goodness sake, make an effort and show some respect.:mad:
 
We use this one at my parish. We all sing it.

adoremus.org/hymns/29%20Gloria.mp3
:thumbsup:It seems that that’s the most popular version for people to sing along to. There are other versions like Byrd or Gounod or Mozart but the choir usually sings those alone.

I don’t even touch the English versions, except I have to admit I did like the old Peter Jones’s version. The Spanish Mass has a couple of nice versions too.
 
I like a through-composed Gloria, that is, one without a refrain. I intensely dislike refrains; it just seems like a very cheesy, overt, trying-too-hard way to get everyone to “participate.”

I couldn’t care less whether there is congregational participation or not. Congregational participation is nice, but then we get stuck into that “participate-a-thon” mode where it becomes practically anathema to have occasional or semi-regular difficult Renaissance polyphonic settings, which I immensely enjoy, and which of course only the choir is usually trained well enough to sing.

Mass becomes too much like a school field day when we are expected to do everything at all times. I certainly think that congregational participation should be fostered in a reasonable and understandable way, but to always sacrifice musical beauty in the name of participation is a kick in the teeth. That is not to say that simpler settings cannot be beautiful, but nothing quite beats an occasional polyphonic setting; some diehard “participation promoters” shudder at that, I find, because it necessitates the majority of the people remaining quiet.

In short, I think balance is key. There is nothing wrong with congregational participation, and I won’t argue against it, but when it becomes the kind of shove-it-down-your-throat “PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION” environment, it’s cheesy and tends to make many people not want to participate in anything at all.

On a related note, I think we Catholics in the recent past have almost turned congregational participation at Mass into a God in and of itself to be worshiped, and I think we have to get out of that theme.

That’s my two cents.

🙂
Unfortunately you’d find yourself in disagreement with the core of Catholic liturgical teachings. The great emphasis there is on communal participation, vs. turning the Eucharist into a private devotion. If we are not participating, what are we doing? Spectating? Observing? Meditating? We did some surveys at all of our Masses recently, and by and large a common crituque was that people (even at the “older crowd” 4pm saturday mass). wanted to dump the older songs in favor of ones that they could actually sing along with. I was even surprised to hear them say (by a 2-1 margin in a crowd with an average age of 72) they preferred guitar over organ because the organ was too loud. They like the gentle guitar sound.

BUT, at the end of the day, if you feel most comfortable in a more low-key celebration, it is your privilege as a Catholic to check out other parishes and find one that makes you comfortable. My comments aside, you should not have to force yourself to be worshipping in a way and place you don’t want to. I am sure you can find a parish that meets your needs, and don’t fee badly about having to do so.
 
Unfortunately you’d find yourself in disagreement with the core of Catholic liturgical teachings. The great emphasis there is on communal participation, vs. turning the Eucharist into a private devotion. If we are not participating, what are we doing? Spectating? Observing? Meditating? We did some surveys at all of our Masses recently, and by and large a common crituque was that people (even at the “older crowd” 4pm saturday mass). wanted to dump the older songs in favor of ones that they could actually sing along with. I was even surprised to hear them say (by a 2-1 margin in a crowd with an average age of 72) they preferred guitar over organ because the organ was too loud. They like the gentle guitar sound.

BUT, at the end of the day, if you feel most comfortable in a more low-key celebration, it is your privilege as a Catholic to check out other parishes and find one that makes you comfortable. My comments aside, you should not have to force yourself to be worshipping in a way and place you don’t want to. I am sure you can find a parish that meets your needs, and don’t fee badly about having to do so.
I don’t advocate a low-key celebration. I advocate for extreme solemnity and glorious beauty.

I challenge you to please put forward any sort of argument that necessarily equates “active participation” with outward busybodiness. It seems we are usually treated more like animals at a corral being stuffed with cheap feed than intelligent humans who can appreciate all aspects of liturgy.
 
I don’t advocate a low-key celebration. I advocate for extreme solemnity and glorious beauty.

I challenge you to please put forward any sort of argument that necessarily equates “active participation” with outward busybodiness. It seems we are usually treated more like animals at a corral being stuffed with cheap feed than intelligent humans who can appreciate all aspects of liturgy.
You may not have to sing the hymns but certainly if the dialogue is sung you are expected to sing the responses in return, just as you are expected to make the responses if they are spoken. It ain’t a dialogue if the priest is the only one speaking/singing.
 
You may not have to sing the hymns but certainly if the dialogue is sung you are expected to sing the responses in return, just as you are expected to make the responses if they are spoken. It ain’t a dialogue if the priest is the only one speaking/singing.
I am criticizing here the extreme attitude of having everybody doing something all the time, and the attitude that musical beauty should be sacrificed to get people to sing along.
 
…I challenge you to please put forward any sort of argument that necessarily equates “active participation” with outward busybodiness. It seems we are usually treated more like animals at a corral being stuffed with cheap feed than intelligent humans who can appreciate all aspects of liturgy.
This kind of comments are totally uncalled for and they are usually referenced to as “appeal to ridicule” and as “appeal to emotions” thus it is a not a solid manner to argument about liturgical theories. Probably your point would be a valid one if presented in a more objective manner.
 
This kind of comments are totally uncalled for and they are usually referenced to as “appeal to ridicule” and as “appeal to emotions” thus it is a not a solid manner to argument about liturgical theories. Probably your point would be a valid one if presented in a more objective manner.
Yes, I suppose. Though I don’t understand why it is uncalled for, as it truly represents my own feeling on the matter, and it was not rude.

Please excuse my little rant there.
 
Yes, I suppose. Though I don’t understand why it is uncalled for, as it truly represents my own feeling on the matter, and it was not rude.

Please excuse my little rant there.
I have red quite of bit of your posts in the past and it seems to me that your are quite able to make solid and fruitful arguments to support your ideas. I understand your feelings and I am not saying that you were rude even if I think that your approach was not called for. I know that your contribution to the discussion can be more focused and helpful for the rest of us, I have seen you doing that before and in an effective manner.
 
I have red quite of bit of your posts in the past and it seems to me that your are quite able to make solid and fruitful arguments to support your ideas. I understand your feelings and I am not saying that you were rude even if I think that your approach was not called for. I know that your contribution to the discussion can be more focused and helpful for the rest of us, I have seen you doing that before and in an effective manner.
Well, thank you, Cristiano.
 
I think that if I were in a really traditional parish that could do that beautiful Gloria that you are describing, YTC, I would indeed feel very uplifted by it. Myself, I have a wide range - I love any Catholic music and liturgy as long as there are no liturgical abuses, and where I live there’s usually not too much danger of that, for which I’m thankful. The more “contemporary” settings are fine with me if sung reverently.

I love hearing the Credo sung in Latin on EWTN - I vaguely remember singing it in an English version when I was a tiny thing in the 1960s - anyone else remember that?

I’d love to sing the Gloria and the Credo at every Mass - I guess I should look for music to the Credo for the new English translation; I could play it on my keyboard at home at least. 🙂

But anyway, back to the Gloria for a moment - I even looked and yes, it is permitted for it to be responsorial but to me, we have the Responsorial Psalms for that type of music, and Psalms are more like poetic verses so that fits.

I find that when I sing the entire Gloria straight through it feels more like a cohesive whole of praise to God.

Reciting it without music seems . . . bland? Missing the point?🤷

“He who sings, prays twice” - St. Augustine
 
I prefer it when nobody sings the Ordinary of Mass at all, and they’re all silently praying away on their rosaries, because that is the true spirit of active participation. I believe that choirs should be abolished as relics of a simpler time.
 
I like the whole congregation to sing as a whole. I am in my parish now because I really liked the idea that everyone sang, or most people sang, kind of like the churches I grew up in. It is truly a sense of communal praise, especially in the Gloria.

Before the new translation, everyone sang. Now, we all have the chorus down throughout, but only the choir has the verses solid. Give us six more months and we will be back up singing the whole thing good with vigor. We are currently using the Mass of Creation.

The only time we have a choir singing is when we do the Jubilate Dei Gloria. We have a core of about six people that sing it and carry it.
 
I prefer to sing along with the choir and not just sing the response. The priests and deacons usually sing the verses as well.
 
I prefer it when nobody sings the Ordinary of Mass at all, and they’re all silently praying away on their rosaries, because that is the true spirit of active participation. I believe that choirs should be abolished as relics of a simpler time.
:confused:
 
[edited]

But, as to the question, I much prefer to sing along!! But then again, I would be in the choir itself if I could make it to the practices. 😉

Personally, I am convinced that if everyone grew up singing along to the songs they would all be better singers and so you wouldn’t have such a contrast between the congregation singing and having well-performed music. 🤷
 
Where I am, we do the Gloria from Mass VIII. It’s in the hymnal so people can sing it if they wish to, but I think most just let the choir sing it.
 
I prefer it when nobody sings the Ordinary of Mass at all, and they’re all silently praying away on their rosaries, because that is the true spirit of active participation. I believe that choirs should be abolished as relics of a simpler time.
The sarcasm isn’t helpful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top