T
tonyrey
Guest
How do you reconcile these views with belief in God?Honestly, yes.
According to the use of reason, if God does not exist or there is no afterlife, the greatest possible “sin” (based on the use of reason, if one thinks suffering is bad and should be avoided), is to bring forth more suffering (life) in to the world (as every life contains a non-zero amount of suffering). Non-existence is better than existence, according to non-Theistic premises, as the privation of happiness is not an intrinsic evil, but the experience of suffering is: not to exist is to be deprived of happiness, whereas to exist is to suffer: thus, non-existence is more felicitous than existence).
Even though the position itself (procreation is an intrinsic evil/voluntary extinction) is verboten even amongst secular atheists, which is another instance of their denial of reason). Another instance of my, based on the presuppositions I held at the time, following the argument wherever it may lead.
One of my favorite books for quite a while was Better Never to Have Been: the Harm of Coming in to Existence (a 250-page impeccably reasoned defense of the matter, including refutations of rebuttals) by an atheistic ethical utilitarian, David Benatar. And I am quite a fan of Schopenhauer.