Does faith change a person?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lanman87
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

lanman87

Guest
Can someone be made a New Creation, be adopted as a Child of God and be filled with the Holy Spirit without displaying a changed life that seeks to Glorify God and seeks do the works we were created in Christ Jesus to do?
 
Can someone be made a New Creation, be adopted as a Child of God and be filled with the Holy Spirit without displaying a changed life that seeks to Glorify God and seeks do the works we were created in Christ Jesus to do?
Yes. It happens all the time in infant Baptism. The infant is changed but there is no discernible sign of that change.

However, receiving and accepting God’s prevenient gift of faith does change a person. Once one turns to God in faith, he begins to learn God,s will and to do the works which please God. Then, having gained holy wisdom, he requests Baptism. It is at this point that having been washed with water we receive the Holy Spirit and He infuses us with His gifts. And we are made born again children of God.
 
Sadly, yes. A person can be baptized - young or old - and choose mortal sin, and enjoy the temporal satisfactions of sin, and be unwilling to repent. I read that Adolf Hitler was baptized.
 
If something does not grow and change, it is dead. The growth may be slow and internal, but, if one is nurturing their faith (reception of the Sacraments, prayer, etc.) you will look back and see how far you’ve grown.
 
However, receiving and accepting God’s prevenient gift of faith does change a person. Once one turns to God in faith, he begins to learn God,s will and to do the works which please God. Then, having gained holy wisdom, he requests Baptism. It is at this point that having been washed with water we receive the Holy Spirit and He infuses us with His gifts. And we are made born again children of God.
This is an obvious different in Catholic and Evangelical Theology. From the evangelical perspective all of those things I mentioned (new creation, adopted, filled with the Holy Spirit) happen at conversion, which may or may not include water baptism.
 
This is an obvious different in Catholic and Evangelical Theology. From the evangelical perspective all of those things I mentioned (new creation, adopted, filled with the Holy Spirit) happen at conversion, which may or may not include water baptism.
Yes. That’s true. I believe Luther said that the Reformation stands or falls on this difference.

If I might make another observation. It seems that Protestants emphasize the “feel good” experience of conversion and the Catholic Church does not go by feelings, but by pure belief that God has done something for us.

Let me see if I can illustrate.

I was baptized as an infant. I fell away when I was still very young and became an atheist. When my wife conceived our first child, I had what you would describe as a born again experience. But according to Catholic Doctrine, I was born again when I was an infant. Dilemma, right?

Well, I didn’t know anything about that, then. I knew very little about anybody’s soteriology. So, I actually set that aside for a while and chalked it up to a joyful euphoric feeling. And I began to fall away again. But, two years later, my wife conceived again and I had another born again experience. Protestants say this only happens once, right?

But Catholicism doesn’t go by feelings. If you were baptized in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, you’re baptism is your spiritual birthday into the Body of Christ. That’s the Catholic Doctrine. It doesn’t matter how good you felt then. It doesn’t matter if the person who baptized you was an adulterous murderer. God’s grace is irresistible. But God is a Gentleman. He won’t force Himself upon you. If you want His grace and place no obstacle before Him, God will grant it to you.

Anyway, that’s how the Catholic Church looks at it. Its not about how we feel. Its about what God does for us. That’s why you’ll find a lot of Catholics leave the Church and become Protestants. They go to Mass with the idea of “what will God do for me”. Rather than, answering our Lord’s call, “Could you not spend one hour with me?” They didn’t want the Mass to be about worshipping God. They wanted it to be about loud music and feeling happy. They’d rather dance their way into hell, then spend one hour contemplating Our Lord.

Anyway…
 
I suspect you mean ADULTS here:smiley:

And NO, I [me personally] think not.

If we are living as GOD desires, commands and Ordains; then it ought to evident in HOW we are living, in our graced life choices.

GREAT Question: thanks

Pray very much,
Patrick
 
If I might make another observation. It seems that Protestants emphasize the “feel good” experience of conversion and the Catholic Church does not go by feelings, but by pure belief that God has done something for us.
This is a fair criticism in Evangelical circles. One that I believe is starting to be addressed in many Evangelical churches. Take for instance, this short clip from David Platt. He is the President of the Southern Baptist International Mission Board, which is the largest mission organization in the Southern Baptist Convention. Which is the largest Evangelist denomination in the USA.

Edit- David Platt was elected at President of the IMB after he preached this sermon so it is fair to say this is the direction the Southern Baptist Church is headed.


or this short (7 minute) exert from a Paul Washer sermon. Paul Washer is a leading evangelist in my neck of the woods.
 
Last edited:
This is a fair criticism in Evangelical circles. One that I believe is starting to be addressed in many Evangelical churches…
That’s good. So, the Reformed churches are unreforming. 😉

You said:
This is an obvious different in Catholic and Evangelical Theology. From the evangelical perspective all of those things I mentioned (new creation, adopted, filled with the Holy Spirit) happen at conversion, which may or may not include water baptism.
Another difference is in the way that we understand “conversion”. For you, I believe, correct me if I’m wrong, this is a one time event. But the Catholic Church Teaches that this is a life long struggle with sin. We must turn to God, daily.

As for me, personally, I still struggle with sin and so I call out to God and to His Saints, frequently.

Can you honestly tell me that you no longer struggle with sin? And when you overcome, do you not consider it a “conversion” or “turning towards”, God, which has saved you again?

I do.
 
40.png
lanman87:
Can someone be made a New Creation, be adopted as a Child of God and be filled with the Holy Spirit without displaying a changed life that seeks to Glorify God and seeks do the works we were created in Christ Jesus to do?
Yes. It happens all the time in infant Baptism. The infant is changed but there is no discernible sign of that change.

However, receiving and accepting God’s prevenient gift of faith does change a person. Once one turns to God in faith, he begins to learn God,s will and to do the works which please God. Then, having gained holy wisdom, he requests Baptism. It is at this point that having been washed with water we receive the Holy Spirit and He infuses us with His gifts. And we are made born again children of God.
Baptism does not guarantee that someone will seek to glorify God or seek to do the works of our Lord. It is a gift of washing away sins consequence, being adopted as a child of God, being given the Holy Spirit, and accepted into the Church with privileges and obligations.
 
Another difference is in the way that we understand “conversion”. For you, I believe, correct me if I’m wrong, this is a one time event. But the Catholic Church Teaches that this is a life long struggle with sin. We must turn to God, daily.
I’m know theologian but I must say after spending 5 months on this board I’m getting better at it. 😀

However, the Evangelical (I don’t like using the word Protestant because I don’t know of anyone in my circle of believers protesting the the Roman Catholic Church) position is that salvation is a three fold action.

1st is the conversion, that is placing faith in Christ. This is when we are adopted and filled with the Holy Spirit as opposed to baptism which is what I understand the RCC to believe. This conversion supernaturally changes our heart. We are made new creations in Christ. It is because of our faith that we receive the gift of eternal life. There are two schools of thought on how this happens, Calvinism and Arminianism, Predestination and election versus free will. But both would say the Faith is the instrumental cause for salvation/adoption/new creation.

2nd is Sanctification, this is the work of the Holy Spirit conforming us to the image of God. If conversion supernaturally changes our heart then sanctification supernaturally changes our actions and is a direct result of conversion (our heart being changed). This is God giving us victory over sins in our life and the fruits of the Spirit being made manifest in our life. As we seek God and grow in faith we are more and more changed into His likeness and we become more and more obedient to the teachings of the Bible and nudging of the Holy Spirit. We become outwardly what God has done inwardly. Sanctification is daily taking up our cross and following Him. We believe that Conversion without Sanctification (ongoing faith and obedience) was not genuine conversion. People can make declarations of faith and it not be a true saving faith. I believe there are plenty of folks in American churches who have declared their faith in Christ but are cultural or intellectual Christians. They go to church because their culture will look down on them if they don’t. This is especially true here in the Bible belt. They know all the church words to say and all the “church culture” but inwardly they are still dead in their sins.

3rd is Glorification. This is when our lives are over and we come into the presence of God. The sin nature will no longer plague us and we will enter Heaven to live with Christ forever.
 
Last edited:
Do you like these little sermons?
Yes, I think much of the evangelical church has focused on getting people to “say the prayer” instead of having a true conversion experience that is deep and lasting. Ironically, it is the reemergence of Reformed Doctrine in Southern Baptist churches that has led to a changing of focus from “decisions” for Christ to “conversions” for Christ. It is groups like the Gospel Coalition that have led the charge to make true conversion the focus of the efforts instead of mere decisions.

What did you think of those videos?
 
When the diciples were faced with a challenging teaching they asked for God to increase their faith. They apparently believed faith changes a person.
 
Last edited:
40.png
rcwitness:
Do you like these little sermons?
Yes, I think much of the evangelical church has focused on getting people to “say the prayer” instead of having a true conversion experience that is deep and lasting. Ironically, it is the reemergence of Reformed Doctrine in Southern Baptist churches that has led to a changing of focus from “decisions” for Christ to “conversions” for Christ. It is groups like the Gospel Coalition that have led the charge to make true conversion the focus of the efforts instead of mere decisions.

What did you think of those videos?
I think they are motivational sermons. I don’t think they are much different than the ones surrounding the “sinner’s prayer” calls.

I’ve heard good sermons which end in a call to the sinner’s prayer. I don’t have much problem with the sinner’s prayer.

I don’t mind the expression “asking Jesus into our hearts”. He stands at the door, and knocks! We should encourage each other to ask Him in!

It’s just techniques and styles. Why bash someone’s phrases or style?

But I agree with some of their points. Like that the sinner’s prayer is not verbatim in Scripture. And we are called to constant conversion towards Him, and repentance from a life conformed to this world.

There is no need to bash other techniques. There are incredible preachers, reaching into the lives of sinners, asking them to pray with them and accept Jesus into their lives. There have been genuine conversions this way. Why bash it because some don’t maintain the faith?

Rather, supplement preaching and hearing with Baptism, fruits of repentance, standing up after every fall, treating others with kindness and mercy, participating in a ministry at church, examining our conscience so we receive His body and blood in a worthy manner, receiving absolution from the Sacrament often, praying for our clergy, open your heart at every Mass, listen to His Word, study Church Teaching, rely on the Holy Spirit to help you understand, etc… etc…
 
I’m know theologian but I must say after spending 5 months on this board I’m getting better at it. 😀
👍
I don’t like using the word Protestant because I don’t know of anyone in my circle of believers protesting the the Roman Catholic Church
Why is it, then, that every time I’m around a bunch of Evangelicals, it seems the first thing out of their mouths is “works” righteousness (a false claim they always lob at the Catholic Church), or “I used to be Catholic but”. Is it just for my benefit?
However, the Evangelical… position is that salvation is a three fold action.
1st is the conversion, that is placing faith in Christ. This is when we are adopted and filled with the Holy Spirit as opposed to baptism which is what I understand the RCC to believe.
Yes, for us it’s it’s conversion by faith then regeneration in the waters of Baptism. And initial conversion is not just saying, I believe, but entails studying and producing works of repentance.
This conversion supernaturally changes our heart. We are made new creations in Christ. It is because of our faith that we receive the gift of eternal life. There are two schools of thought on how this happens, Calvinism and Armenianism, Predestination and election versus free will. But both would say the Faith is the instrumental cause for salvation/adoption/new creation.
The difference here is immense. You have two schools of thought but not under one authority which protects the integrity of the doctrine. Your two schools can take Scripture and turn it on it’s head, as they have frequently. Look at Calvinism with its doctrine of “Total Depravity”. And that whole sordid idea of “penal substitution” where they pit the Father against His only begotten and most beloved Son.

We also have schools of thought. But they are governed by the Church and don’t deviate from God’s Doctrines and principles. AND they willingly submit to this authority.
2nd is Sanctification,
For us, all these processes occur simultaneously. As one gets closer to God, one is sanctified by His proximity.
this is the work of the Holy Spirit conforming us to the image of God. If conversion supernaturally changes our heart then sanctification supernaturally changes our actions and is a direct result of conversion (our heart being changed). This is God giving us victory over sins in our life and the fruits of the Spirit being made manifest in our life.
This last part mostly conforms to Catholic Doctrine. But, what you haven’t mentioned is that you don’t believe that one can fall away. But that doesn’t match the real human experience. Because I know of many Evangelicals who have fallen away. And some which have become Catholic, which other Evangelicals regard as falling away.

cont’d
 
cont’d
As we seek God
Which we call continual conversion.
and grow in faith
Which we consider continuous justification.
we are more and more changed into His likeness and we become more and more obedient to the teachings of the Bible and nudging of the Holy Spirit.
Which we consider continual sanctification. Divinization is also here.
We become outwardly what God has done inwardly. Sanctification is daily taking up our cross and following Him. We believe that Conversion without Sanctification (ongoing faith and obedience) was not genuine conversion. People can make declarations of faith and it not be a true saving faith. I believe there are plenty of folks in American churches who have declared their faith in Christ but are cultural or intellectual Christians. They go to church because their culture will look down on them if they don’t. This is especially true here in the Bible belt. They know all the church words to say and all the “church culture” but inwardly they are still dead in their sins.
If you know all this, then why do Evangelicals cling to the idea that people can’t fall away?
3rd is Glorification. This is when our lives are over and we come into the presence of God. The sin nature will no longer plague us and we will enter Heaven to live with Christ forever.
We also call that Glorification. And Divinization. But Divinization is also a process that begins with conversion, as well. I’ll go back and fit it in.

Good talk. Thanks for the opportunity to compare, apples to apples, the differences in our religions. You’ll also find that the Catholic Faith is exactly what is described in Scripture. Whereas, Evangelical faith has to twist Scripture in order to make it fit their man made doctrines.

God bless you
 
Last edited:
I think they are motivational sermons. I don’t think they are much different than the ones surrounding the “sinner’s prayer” calls.

I’ve heard good sermons which end in a call to the sinner’s prayer. I don’t have much problem with the sinner’s prayer.
I don’t have a problem with a sinners prayer when applied correctly. That is, it is an introduction of someone to Christ that may or may not be an indication of true conversion. I think the problem we evangelicals have had is that we automatically assume that if someone “Says the prayer” that they have come to faith in Christ. I believe much of the evangelical community is starting to realize that it isn’t always the case that the sinners prayer=faith/conversion.

Thankfully, in the circles I’m apart of we are starting to put more emphasis on discipleship of new believers and those who have said “the sinners prayer” in order to do our best to confirm that they truly have faith in Christ instead of just declaring their faith in Christ, which is sometimes done for extraneous reasons.
 
I don’t have a problem with a sinners prayer when applied correctly. That is, it is an introduction of someone to Christ that may or may not be an indication of true conversion. I think the problem we evangelicals have had is that we automatically assume that if someone “Says the prayer” that they have come to faith in Christ. I believe much of the evangelical community is starting to realize that it isn’t always the case that the sinners prayer=faith/conversion.

Thankfully, in the circles I’m apart of we are starting to put more emphasis on discipleship of new believers and those who have said “the sinners prayer” in order to do our best to confirm that they truly have faith in Christ instead of just declaring their faith in Christ, which is sometimes done for extraneous reasons.
Soon, you’ll bring back Sacramental Confession and Eucharist and then, there will remain no more barriers for coming back to the Catholic Church.

Catholic Doctrine is truly, the Wisdom of God. How can you accept the multiplicity of conflicting doctrines and competing confessions? There is only One God, One Lord, One Faith, One Baptism. And One Church through which God speaks. Not myriads of conflicting voices.

It’s just wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top