Does God call people to be separate from Catholic Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcwitness
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
  1. crap meaning agenda.
  2. if you read matthew and read the scriptures the part where it says it is written and you look up those words that were written in the old testament, you will see it was the word of God that Jesus was quoting which is the scriptures in the bible, which he used only.
 
Yes, I think there is an assumption (as there must be for all those who embrace Sola Scriptura) that the whole of the Apostolic teaching is contained in them.
Not only an assumption but a credo: ‘if not found in Scriptures.’

Even when Scriptures themselves demonstrate that not all is found in Scriptures they then formulate: ‘that nothing necessary for Salvation’ is not found in Scriptures., and since it is them who set the parameter, there’s no way that anyone can give them a response that would satisfy since they will reject anything that demonstrates differently.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
I only surmise that for sure that God chose to record that which was worthy and wise of Paul’s utterances
Do you read your words in your mind as you type them… you’ve just explained away the whole of Christian Faith outside of what is found Written in Scriptures as not important to Christianity by God’s own Determination.

Do you not realize that what was Written was Inspired because it was needed as a record and as a leg of the Faith and that the Oral Teaching of the Apostles was Gospel even before the Gospels were put into ink?

Do you actually believe that the Apostles’ Ministry consisted in just reading the Epistles as St. Paul, Peter, and James would ink them?

…and the Gospels, do you truly believe that Jesus left the Church in the dark for decades till the Gospels were all Written and brought together as a compilation of the Gospel of Christ?

You reason as those who claim that the Catholic Church is the worst enemy of art, science and anything and everything else because 'the Church destroyed and burnt all books and kills all scholars that opposed her… such finite understanding allows for peace of mind but only when accepting a very limited reality.

The Oral Teaching came first. It was the Only Format used by Christ. It did not cease when the Gospels and the Epistles were Written!

Consider that you’ve just stated that the Holy Spirit did not Guide the Church till the Written Tradition came into existence and that once it did the Oral Tradition ceased to exist.

Wow, talk about tunnel vision!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Please open your heart and mind. Do you actually believe that only what is found in Scriptures is such?

Consider St. Paul Revelation that Jesus was the Rock that followed the Hebrew in their trek in the dessert and Gave them the Water of Life–this is found only once in Scriptures… do you actually believe that St. Paul just had a “Rock” moment and birth such understanding?

Do you not see that the letters, as the Gospels, are a response to what was developing after the Inauguration of the Church, on Pentecost Day?

The New Covenant’s Writings did not take place in a vacuum. They are a response and a call to arms. Yet, not something that took shape around the Church but because of the Church, the Living Organism, which is Christ’s Body.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
What I have described is what the CC calls material and “formal” sufficiency. St. Paul wrote that the Scriptures were sufficient to lead Timothy to faith in Christ. But only the Apostolic teaching could show Timothy how that Christian life was to be lived (formal sufficiency).
When did St. Paul state that they were sufficient?

Did St. Paul mean only the Old Covenant’s Writings?

Did St. Paul mean also the New Covenant’s even though they have not been Written/Compiled?

Do you see where I’m headed?

‘Scriptural sufficiency is a flawed construct brought forth by the solo Scriptura desire to remove Jesus’ Delegated Authority from His Founded Church.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Thank you, I agree since the Holy Spirit would continue His Personal Divine Act. Wouldn’t this scenario of a world without a member of the Body set the world back to a first mention in the bible sort of thing?

As for no bibles and only members of the Body. I agree with you that the Church would be different. Since I believe that the Holy Spirit most fertile field is the Body and his commission is to recall from memory what Christ did and taught, it would be a faith testing experience that in the end sifted and strengthened the Body.
Wananno, Im glad to read you again
 
Last edited:
crap meaning agenda.
And what might that be? Do you think the Catholic Church has an “agenda”?
if you read matthew and read the scriptures the part where it says it is written and you look up those words that were written in the old testament, you will see it was the word of God that Jesus was quoting which is the scriptures in the bible, which he used only.
If it were true that Jesus used “only” the OT scriptures, then most of our NT would be invalid.

There is also the problem that he used and quoted the Septuagint, as did the Apostles. This version of the OT has been rejected by the children of the Reformers as Scripture.
Wow, talk about tunnel vision!
Tunnel vision is a required foundation for Sola Scriptura.
Timothy how that Christian life was to be lived (formal sufficiency).
14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15 and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is inspired by God and[a] profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." 2 Tim.

The Scriptures lead one to Christ for salvation, and Christ established the Church for salvation.
Did St. Paul mean only the Old Covenant’s Writings?
Since there were no other “Scriptures” upon which Timothy could be raised, Paul is undoubtedly referring to the Septuagint.
Did St. Paul mean also the New Covenant’s even though they have not been Written/Compiled?
It seems that Paul considered his writings as being on the same level as the oral teachings of the Apostles, though in that passage, he was referring only to the Septuagint, and the Sacred Tradition of his mother and grandmother (Jewish faith).
Do you see where I’m headed?
No, sorry.
 
‘Scriptural sufficiency is a flawed construct brought forth by the solo Scriptura desire to remove Jesus’ Delegated Authority from His Founded Church.
There are different levels of sufficiency. Surely you will accept that the NT is a collection of Catholic books, written by, for, and about Catholic faith. [For this reason, if St. Paul declares the Scripture sufficient to lead on to salvation then the Church will not teach otherwise.](http://14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15 and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is inspired by God and[a] profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.)
 
Just something to ponder.
What sola Scripturalist continue to ignore, either genuinely unaware or stubbornly rejecting, is the simplest of passages in the book of Acts that demonstrates that sola Scriptura does not work: the Ethiopian Official to whom the Holy Spirit sent/brought Philip, did he, from his avid reading of Sacred Writings determined that he needed to be Baptized to become part of the Body of Christ when he met Philip or was he walking as a blind man in the darkness of the Spiritual quest?

It was only after he was instructed by one of Christ’s Disciples that he was able to make such a confession of Faith: ‘what, impedes you from Baptizing me in Christ Jesus?’ (paraphrased)

Now here’s the reality of the Body of Christ: was the Holy Spirit unable to bring the Ethiopian into the Fold all by Himself or did He need Philip’s Faith to Convert the Ethiopian or did He Use Philip to Unfold the Body of Christ in the manner which Jesus Modeled: Breathing the Holy Spirit onto man so that the Living Water would Flow?

I’ve just remember another (which I offered before) the magic maker, Simon, could he not have unlocked the powers of God as he intended by just having access to the Sacred Writings?

…finally (this just chimed in), the false teachers, why were the Apostles Writing against their heresies? Was it not because they were taking the Written Word of God and attempting to pervert the Gospel (Good News) of Christ?:
1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. (1 St. John 4)
1 But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign LORD who bought them-bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. 3In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping. (2 St. Peter 2)
Maran atha!

Angel
 
Last edited:
[quote="Nicene, post:2234,

…finally (this just chimed in), the false teachers, why were the Apostles Writing against their heresies? Was it not because they were taking the Written Word of God and attempting to pervert the Gospel (Good News) of Christ?:
1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. (1 St. John 4)
**1 But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign LORD who bought them-bringing swift destruction on themselves. 2Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. 3In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been
Maybe and probably and also probably included some who were bringing in false traditions and pagan rituals.
 
Matthew 4: 1-11 I see that sola scriptula straight from the old testiment did some good there.
What do you understand from this passage?

Do you believe that it points/support “Scriptures” alone have the Authority God Delegated?

Here’s hat is taking place:

Jesus is led by the Holy Spirit into the dessert, after being Baptized.
Satan, using Sacred Scriptures, attempts to derail Jesus from His Salvific Plan.
Satan leaks out that all the kingdoms of the world are in his hands (he has access to all of humanity).
Jesus, after tolerating Satan for a little time, Commands Satan to leave His Presence.
Satan, demonstrating that Jesus is God, capitulates and removes himself from Christ’s Presence.
Immediately, after Satan being cast off, holy angels descend to cater to Jesus: both Creatures from above and from bellow are subject to Jesus’ Authority!

No. Not one verse about Scriptures being set as the Divine Authority, not even Delegated Authority.

Scriptures are a Source of Life, but as the moon reflects the sun’s radiance: God is the Actual Source of Life that is not Reflected!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Last edited:
Does th church have an agenda?
Depends on who is in what position of the church and what agenda that individual wants to push.
  1. The NT would be invalid because it was not created and he had only the OT to go on.
 
if you read matthew and read the scriptures the part where it says it is written and you look up those words that were written in the old testament,
The problem is that not once did the Old Covenant nor the New Covenant made the statement: “sola Scriptura.”

Rather, what we find is that there is a Promise (Jesus: Salvific Plan) and that Jesus, as well as the Father, cannot be accessed but through the Holy Spirit–Scriptures do not allow access to the Father or to the Son; Scriptures are the Written Revelation of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are a Record of God’s Salvific Plan and a Revelation to man. Yet, to access God a person must be Granted this Gift by the Holy Spirit and not once did the Holy Spirit state: go to Scriptures as the source: rather, they point to the Source: Christ… and do you recall the Great Commission?

It was not, go, take to ‘sola Scriptura.’

This is the Great Commission:
18Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.” (St. Matthew 28)
Delegation of Jesus Authority to the Church.
The Command to Go and Preach (not go to Scriptures).
The Command to Go and Baptize.
The Command to Go and Teach.
The Command to Pass His Commandments.
The Command to Obey Jesus’ Commandments.
Jesus Promise to Remain in the Church till the end of age.
Nope no ‘sola Scriptura’ in the Greatest Commission!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
**14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15 and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All scripture is inspired by God and[a] profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." 2 Tim.
The Scriptures lead one to Christ for salvation, and Christ established the Church for salvation

Do you not see that St. Paul is speaking not only of Sacred Scriptures but of all of the components?

Faith, Teachers, Tradition, and yes, Scriptures (Old Testament Writings).

It is this combination of things that makes the difference between Timothy and the Utopian that met with Philip. The first was guided by people who were in Fellowship with Yahweh God and passed not only the sound Teachings found in the Written Tradition but also those Teachings found in the Oral Tradition while the latter only had the narrow understanding of the Written Word which he could not make to profit in the absence of the proper Teaching.

There are “atheists” that are more familiar with the content of the Bible than many who purport to being Catholic/Christian; yet, as agnostics, they claim to not be able to know God because there’s no evidence of Him. If sola Scriptura were the essence of what it is claimed (Life) then there would be almost no atheist and agnostics left in the world.

In the Absence of the Holy Spirit the world cannot Know God:
15 If you love me, keep my commandments. 16 And I will ask the Father, and he shall give you another Paraclete, that he may abide with you for ever. 17 The spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, nor knoweth him: but you shall know him; because he shall abide with you, and shall be in you. (St. John 14)
Do you see how Jesus does not refer His Disciples to Scriptures but to the Guidance of the Holy Spirit–the same Holy Spirit that the world cannot see (Know)?

Maran atha!

Angel
 
It doesnt need to do sola scriptura, That doesnt take a genious to figure out

God didnt need the OT scriptures because he already knew them by heart, technically speaking he created them

When the deciples went out to all the world, they didnt carry a copy of the scriptures with them because they had the Holy Spirit to give them words to say.
 
the Scripture sufficient to lead on to salvation
Yet, he states: Scriptures are able–sufficient is taken by those who reject the Church’s Authority as ‘do not need anything else but,’ do you truly believe that St. Paul is making such statement?

Maran atha!

Angel
 
the Gospels, do you truly believe that Jesus left the Church in the dark for decades till the Gospels were all Written and brought together as a compilation of the Gospel of Christ?
Do you truly believe that any aspect of the powerful life changing oral gospel was left out of Sacred Writings?
 
Last edited:
Maybe and probably and also probably included some who were bringing in false traditions and pagan rituals.
Notice the Writing… “false teachers” and “bring the way of truth into disrepute;” these are active works against the Truth… just as Satan, the murderer and liar from the Beginning, who took the Word of God and perverted its Teaching: ‘you should not die’ and ‘go ahead, do as I say, make bread out of rocks, jump from the tallest building, God will not let anything happen to you.’ (paraphrased)

It is not just about contradicting teaching or inventing things; it is about taking the Word of God and twisting its Teaching/Meaning.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
But He also said" you have it in the scriptures but I say"

I can vouch for your point about the Holy Spirit acting on the individual that lives in an environment where the Gospel has already been proclaimed. Sola Scriptura led me to the truth of the Church Catholic. I don’t believe it is humanly possible if the Gospel message is absent from the environment.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top