R
rcwitness
Guest
About what? Baptism? No, the Church recognizes a valid Christian denomination if there exists a valid Christian Baptism according to Catholic definition.
I don’t think that our current selection is flawed. Everyone can understand them :man_shrugging:t2:Translations may be flawed
You know sects also use oil, right?I have explained to you, and you are still confused!
The Church defines what constitutes a valid Sacrament Baptism. A waterless Baptism is insufficient to be called a Sacrament by the Catholic Church. This is the primary mark of what makes denomination validly Christian.
I only skimmed, since I am quite busy.Baptism.
Now, please tell the truth; did you read the article on how Quakers practice and percieve baptism?
When you have time read it in depth. I knew we’re being quite combative on this and it no doubt biases you. But the baptism of spirit is a very real thing; the presence of the holy ghost means more than water or oil.Alex337:![]()
I only skimmed, since I am quite busy.Baptism.
Now, please tell the truth; did you read the article on how Quakers practice and percieve baptism?
If there is no water, it cannot be valid, according to the Catholic faith. You should know this, but you are desperately trying to ignore it.
It sure does!!! Yet, the absence of water violates a necessary form of a valid Sacrament.rcwitness:![]()
When you have time read it on depth. I knew we’re being quite combative on this and it no doubt biases you. But the baptism of spirit is a very real thing; the presence of the holy ghost means more than water or oil.Alex337:![]()
I only skimmed, since I am quite busy.Baptism.
Now, please tell the truth; did you read the article on how Quakers practice and percieve baptism?
If there is no water, it cannot be valid, according to the Catholic faith. You should know this, but you are desperately trying to ignore it.
For a Catholic sacrament, yes. But we’re not Catholic. We perform our sacraments differently. Remember, many protestants even disagree with how many sacraments there are.Alex337:![]()
It sure does!!! Yet, the absence of water violates a necessary form of a valid Sacrament.rcwitness:![]()
When you have time read it on depth. I knew we’re being quite combative on this and it no doubt biases you. But the baptism of spirit is a very real thing; the presence of the holy ghost means more than water or oil.Alex337:![]()
I only skimmed, since I am quite busy.Baptism.
Now, please tell the truth; did you read the article on how Quakers practice and percieve baptism?
If there is no water, it cannot be valid, according to the Catholic faith. You should know this, but you are desperately trying to ignore it.