B
benedictus2
Guest
First off, I truly apologize for snapping at you. I thought I detected anger in your post and reacted accordingly. But I was wrong. So, I am really sorry.
The First Cause does match the definition of God as Creator from whom all things ensued, just not the OTG as you defined it.
I am not sure as I have not read all arguments for it, whether anyone has drawn a line connecting the First Cause to the the Triune God as known to us now.
The First Cause is still the “Catholic God” in the end because there is only One God. What it does is prove that there is a Creator and Creator is one aspect of the Catholic God. So it is still the same God just narrowly known by His Function.
Which is why I did not respond because as I had mentioned in another thread, I do not want arguments from the Bible or the Church as this begs the question.Also in post #2 “the Church” was listed as an argument for God and you responded without any attacks at all.
I don’t think Catholics use this as their reason for their belief in God. Catholics and I think I am speaking for a great majority of us, believe in God and can’t really say why we do. It’s a gift. I only know of this argument because I studied it. However, there are I think those who believe in Christ who may have first believed in A “God”, the First Cause, and later on came to believe in the Trinity.That is my point. Catholics use this argument as their reason for believing in God more than any other, yet the “First Cause” does not match with the definition of God. Not mine, nor the one listed in the catechism.
The First Cause does match the definition of God as Creator from whom all things ensued, just not the OTG as you defined it.
I am not sure as I have not read all arguments for it, whether anyone has drawn a line connecting the First Cause to the the Triune God as known to us now.
I did not miss that you thought they were poor arguments. What I was trying to get at was that the way you have outlined the arguments is not how we use these arguments at all.I understand the difference, and yet is is routinely used as an argument as if that god and the Catholic “God” were the same thing.
Did you not catch that I thought these were poor arguments?
The First Cause is still the “Catholic God” in the end because there is only One God. What it does is prove that there is a Creator and Creator is one aspect of the Catholic God. So it is still the same God just narrowly known by His Function.
I totally understand. That is okay.Just for future reference, I promise that I will be far more civil to you if you post an answer to a thread I start asking for the opinions of Catholics.
Or, I would, if I wasn’t currently putting you onto my ignore list.