Does the Catholic Church recognize the story of Noah and the flood as being literally true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwillenborg
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You discount views on the bible and science by learned Catholic scholars in favor of a sectarian literalism. Your sources have more holes in their logic than Swiss cheese.

For example, “Evidence of a Worldwide Flood” by Mario Seiglie, cites Cesar Emiliani who says, “A huge amount of ice-melt water rushed into the Gulf of Mexico and produced a sea-level rise that spread around the world with the speed of a tidal wave.” One would really have to stretch the scientific evidence presented by Emiliani to make it evidence for a global deluge. That is, a rapid rise in sea level due to ice-melt water is hardly the same thing as a three-mile deep inundation. Seiglie just ignores the real difference.

Emiliani next states “It clearly shows that there was a major period of flooding from 12,000 to 10,000 years ago, with a peak about 11,600 years ago.” Oops, the scientific evidence again doesn’t agree with Seiglie’s creationist views, so he has to arbitrarily discount scientific dating of the ice-melt and say Emiliani’s ice melt had to have been 4,300 years ago. LOL This is comical at best.

The same poor logic is used in Seiglie’s discussion of flood stories. People’s that live in areas that have experienced dramatic flooding have flood stories. However, as Jaki noted Egypt lacks a strong flood tradition, but more interesting is the Mesopotamian stories point to a flood that would have been much older than Seiglie’s 4,300.

Still, there is no evidence for a global inundation, which would have left sediment deposits around the world at the same period of time. No such evidence has been found.

Creationists like Seiglie must do mental gymnastics with scientific evidence and biblical interpretation to a least appear to have some basis for their sectarian views.
No, not sectarian liberalism. Also, some “learned” Catholic scholars do not necessarily “know” the truth nor teach the truth. And, some of them may be Catholic in name only.

I attended a lecture at our church about evolution by a “learned Catholic” priest “scholar” from the Vatican Observatory. At the end, he actually said that God might be a “she.” Apparently, either he did not know or else he did not believe that Jesus told us to call upon His Father. Jesus did not want us to call His Father “mother.” Matthew 6:9

I choose to believe in the flood because I have faith in God’s Word.

Genesis 9:28
28 And Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years.

Genesis 11:10
This is the genealogy of Shem: Shem was one hundred years old, and begot Arphaxad two years after the flood.

2 Peter 2:4-8
or if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 5 and did not** spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly;** 6 and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; 7 and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked 8 (for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds)—

Either a person chooses to believe in the the flood or he doesn’t. I do believe.

exchangedlife.com/Sermons/gen/the_flood.shtml
 
…Do you believe in unicorns too?
Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich claims that she saw them in her vision of Paradise (1st heaven) where Enoch and Elijah are waiting in order to return to earth (when the Antichrist is here.) She also says that they still exist (inferior to the ones in Paradise) far up on the Mountain of the Prophets. This is possibly Mt. Horeb (also called Mt. Sinai by some Rabbis) since the prophets talked to God there.

Unicorns:
propheciesii.blogspot.com/

Mt. Horeb and Mt. Sinai:
jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=817&letter=S&search=horeb

So, perhaps there are unicorns that actually exist outside of her visions. 🙂
 
Since the Atrahasis predates both Gilgamesh and the biblical account and since in the ANE Sumer first developed a writing system-logic must say the Biblical account is derived from the Atrahasis via Gilgamesh.Not the other way around.
 
Since science is not that reliable about history and also has a conflict of interest in finding evidence to support what it’s against, I think science not a reliable measure for belief in the flood, which I think happened. Also, in the early '60’s I read a book titled, Archaeology and the Bible, in which the author presented evidence of a global wide level of sediment dated to 3,500BC. Which surprises me, because a chronology of Genesis shows the flood occurred circa 2,500BC. Anyway, all the different flood traditions from many countries satisfy me that there was a global flood.:cool:

Also, I’ve heard that the legend of unicorns started with the first description of a rhinoceros. There’s two kinds of rhinoceros, one with one horn on its nose (unicorn) and the other with two horns on its nose, both of which still exist to this day. So, there’s some evidence for that, for you :p.
 
Since the Atrahasis predates both Gilgamesh and the biblical account and since in the ANE Sumer first developed a writing system-logic must say the Biblical account is derived from the Atrahasis via Gilgamesh.Not the other way around.
Moses compiled Genesis relying on toledoths. These were the original accounts. They were written on tablets.

The claim that Gilgamesh came before the Biblical account doesn’t even make sense when one accounts for the distortions in the Epic. They are pretty clear to see.

Compare them to the Biblical accounts. You will find the Biblical ones historically true.

gods fighting amongst themselves - geeshhhhhh.😦
 
Noah’s Ark hidden in the ancient Chinese characters

Legends from ancient China describe a global catastrophic
flood so vast that the waters reached the
sun and covered the mountains, drowning all the
land-dwelling creatures, including mankind. In the
midst of this global calamity, there stood a legendary
hero named Nüwa (女媧) who turned back the
flood and helped to repopulate the world. Analysis
of the ancient Chinese Bronzeware, Oracle Bone
and Seal characters that are associated with flood
(洪) and boat (舟) led to the present-day discovery
of evidence for Nüwa’s ark in the Chinese characters.
Nüwa’s ark housed eight worshippers and
‘the remnants of the world’, and finally came to rest
on a mountain. After the flood receded, the world
began to be repopulated from the eight people on
the Ark. Significantly, the Chinese account of the
Flood has been dated to 1000 BC, suggesting that the
Chinese possess one of the oldest written records
of the Deluge.

more…
 
Moses compiled Genesis relying on toledoths. These were the original accounts. They were written on tablets.

The claim that Gilgamesh came before the Biblical account doesn’t even make sense when one accounts for the distortions in the Epic. They are pretty clear to see.

Compare them to the Biblical accounts. You will find the Biblical ones historically true.

gods fighting amongst themselves - geeshhhhhh.😦
What tablets?

And let’s be clear, Catholic are free to accept Moses as the author of Genesis, or not. So regardless of what tables you’re referring to I don’t understand your point.

If the Biblical accounts are true (as you seem to say) were humans created temporally before or after the animals? One can argue either point from the first two chapters.
 
What tablets?

And let’s be clear, Catholic are free to accept Moses as the author of Genesis, or not. So regardless of what tables you’re referring to I don’t understand your point.

If the Biblical accounts are true (as you seem to say) were humans created temporally before or after the animals? One can argue either point from the first two chapters.
What other authorship is there? Don’t tell my you buy into that JEDP mess, especially since it is inherently anti-semitic and anti-Catholic.
 
No - Giglamesh is a corrupted version of the Biblical account.
Not even a possibility. Such an absurd idea was fabricated in order to support a fundamentalist view of Genesis. The assertion is contra-indicated by all available evidence.
 
2Peter 3:3-6- Focus is on the Coming of the Lord

"This is now, beloved, the second letter I am writing to you; in them I am trying to arouse your sincere intention by reminding you 2that you should remember the words spoken in the past by the holy prophets, and the commandment of the Lord and Saviour spoken through your apostles. 3First of all you must understand this, that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and indulging their own lusts 4and saying, ‘Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since our ancestors died,* all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation!’ 5They deliberately ignore this fact, that by the word of God heavens existed long ago and an earth was formed out of water and by means of water, 6through which the world of that time was deluged with water and perished. 7But by the same word the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire, being kept until the day of judgement and destruction of the godless.
8 But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day. 9The Lord is not slow about his promise, as some think of slowness, but is patient with you,* not wanting any to perish, but all to come to repentance. 10But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, and the elements will be dissolved with fire, and the earth and everything that is done on it will be disclosed.*
11 Since all these things are to be dissolved in this way, what sort of people ought you to be in leading lives of holiness and godliness, 12waiting for and hastening* the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set ablaze and dissolved, and the elements will melt with fire? 13But, in accordance with his promise, we wait for new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness is at home.
Final Exhortation and Doxology14 Therefore, beloved, while you are waiting for these things, strive to be found by him at peace, without spot or blemish; 15and regard the patience of our Lord as salvation. So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given to him, 16speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures. 17You therefore, beloved, since you are forewarned, beware that you are not carried away with the error of the lawless and lose your own stability. 18But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.* "
<<
The Magesterium is made up of scripture scholars. Benedict xvi is a scripture scholar. if everbody understood scripture the same way and always looked at in the same way through eternity then the Bible would not be discussed, we would have one translation and scripture would be frozen in time , for all time-with one meaning only,- dead and desiccated. Since it is a living and not a dead thing it should be discussed , reviewed, understood in the context of time and place so it will remain vital in our time and place.Discussion and debate means it’s alive and discussion and debate is how you keep it alive.
That is incorrect. See Humani Generis: vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html

God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Peace,
Ed
 
Most scholars think Gilgamesh was written first. Regardless, no one knows for sure.
The evidence, which includes a number of clay tables, plus internal examination of the Mesopotamian and biblical accounts leave no doubt whatsoever, which came first. The biblical story came later, long after Abraham departed his original homeland.
 
gods fighting amongst themselves - geeshhhhhh.😦
That’s the whole point of having an account the ancients peoples who believed in ONE GOD; which became the biblical tradition. The biblical account sets the record straight on this point. This is the FIRST POINT of theology - both in terms of God revelation to the ancient peoples - and in terms of our Christian Creeds - I BELIEVE IN ONE GOD.

MonFrere
 
A short story of Yahweh creating the heavens and earth, again, about 6,000 - 10, 000 years ago: :rolleyes:

Archaic Sumerian is the earliest stage of inscriptions with linguistic content, beginning with the Jemdet Nasr (Uruk III) period from about the 31st - 30th centuries B.C. It succeeded the “proto-literate” period of the 35th - 30th centuries B.C.

Accordingly, many thousands of Sumerians, probably the first humans to establish systems of writing, i.e. cuneiform (wedge) script on clay tablets, had already established agriculture and government, and were in the process of developing sophisticated irrigation systems when just 6,000 - 10,000 years ago or so Yahweh decided to create the world.

Totally baffled by the Divine voice that said “Let there be light”, the Sumerians looked at each other and exclaimed, “But we already have light.” We have everything in the sky we need; the sun, moon, and stars. What is He doing? :confused:

“Why is he creating dry land, too? We already have a thriving civilization with agriculture on good enough land.”

Nonetheless, Yahweh continued to create plants, animals, and then the first man and woman.

"First man and woman? :eek: What are we Sumerians, then, recycled locusts?

A Sumerian council of elders decided that somebody needed to speak in serious tones to Yahweh about His redundant creations. 😛
 
Legends from ancient China describe a global catastrophic flood so vast that the waters reached the sun and covered the mountains, drowning all the land-dwelling creatures, including mankind.
Why is it when we read ancient Chinese documents about a flood so vast “waters reached the sun” our intelligence somehow informs us that this isn’t to be taken literally; yet when we read of a story where Noah brings animals from the four corners of the earth to be saved on the ark – we labor and twist our logic out of rationality to find ways that this could have happened? – maybe a word needs to be said about the supremacy of the literary skills of our ancient forefathers to absolutely captivate their hearers with a great and imaginative story that still resonates in our “sophisticated” age today. Maybe if we give these ancient peoples their intellectual due - maybe we can understand our own age better.

MonFrere
 
What tablets?

And let’s be clear, Catholic are free to accept Moses as the author of Genesis, or not. So regardless of what tables you’re referring to I don’t understand your point.

If the Biblical accounts are true (as you seem to say) were humans created temporally before or after the animals? One can argue either point from the first two chapters.
Hi, diggerdomer -

I’ve come to the personal conclusion that Gen 1 presents an allegorical history and Gen 2 presents an allegorical prophecy.

Don
 
What other authorship is there? Don’t tell my you buy into that JEDP mess, especially since it is inherently anti-semitic and anti-Catholic.
Hi, CWBetts -

Thank you, so much, for posting that. I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks that.

My reasoning is, that one person can have different writing styles, depending on if he’s tired, rushed, rested, thoughtful or awed at the time of the writing. I’ve seen different styles in my own private journal. Let’s face it, Moses was administrating a march of over a million people with their livestock. He also had to worry about bandits. And, he met God on Sinai. I think that gives lots of room of him writing one way one day and another way another day. imho.

Don
 
A short story of Yahweh creating the heavens and earth, again, about 6,000 - 10, 000 years ago: :rolleyes:

Archaic Sumerian is the earliest stage of inscriptions with linguistic content, beginning with the Jemdet Nasr (Uruk III) period from about the 31st - 30th centuries B.C. It succeeded the “proto-literate” period of the 35th - 30th centuries B.C.

Accordingly, many thousands of Sumerians, probably the first humans to establish systems of writing, i.e. cuneiform (wedge) script on clay tablets, had already established agriculture and government, and were in the process of developing sophisticated irrigation systems when just 6,000 - 10,000 years ago or so Yahweh decided to create the world.

Totally baffled by the Divine voice that said “Let there be light”, the Sumerians looked at each other and exclaimed, “But we already have light.” We have everything in the sky we need; the sun, moon, and stars. What is He doing? :confused:

“Why is he creating dry land, too? We already have a thriving civilization with agriculture on good enough land.”

Nonetheless, Yahweh continued to create plants, animals, and then the first man and woman.

"First man and woman? :eek: What are we Sumerians, then, recycled locusts?

A Sumerian council of elders decided that somebody needed to speak in serious tones to Yahweh about His redundant creations. 😛
Hi, itinerant1 -

This is a satire, right?
Anyway, God did all that around 4,000BC, or about the 40th century BC. Before the Sumerians got their act together.

Enjoyed the satire, but you really need to pay attention to YEC arithmetic. :rolleyes: (I wish there were a tongue-in-cheek icon). OECs have good arithmetic, too.:rolleyes:

Do we really have to pay attention to all these creationists?
No, just the Catholic ones :p.
 
If you are so smart, then you should be able to refute St. Thomas Aquinas’ five proofs for the existence of god with no real problem. So there it is. Refute them
I believe in God. I just don’t believe that a worldwide flood happened. Or that one man built an ark big enough to store all these animals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top