S
Sir_Knight
Guest
Chances are after since John was an old man when it was written and he was the youngest of the Apostles. Thus, it is MOSTLIKELY that Mary was no longer living on this earth.
If you were correct here, then what would be the purpose for anyone posessing a Bible?? This is where so many Protestants are right about Catholics not reading their Bibles. Why would they if they cannot read and interpret what is being read?? 1 Timothy disproves the whole Magisterium quirk because scripture says to study the word of God so that you will know the truth. It doesn’t say leave it up to a select group of high church officials to know it and pass it down. This is baloney and one big reason why I left the RCC.Peter also speaks of Paul’s letters “…in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16).
So no, it’s not just prophecy but private interpretation of all Scripture that is condemned.
Mary was not just a “mere” woman.Chosen she was yes.This "mere"woman was born without sin.This is crucial in understanding what she was to hold in her womb,namely God. How could a sinful woman hold God in her womb? She delivered our salvation, held our salvation in her body.She is the new Eve,just as Jesus is the new Adam. She does not save, this is Christian fact. But she is the “ark” the one who holds the new covenant Jesus. How can you then regulate her to give to a man what she gave to God, namely her body. She remained celibate to follow Jesus as His first disciple, she gave herself totally to Him. ****But remember no Catholic believes she is the Savior, take that into consideration when answering Catholics about Mary.Much of this I can somewhat concur with. You have also made several statements here that just have no Biblical basis. How is Mary the ark of the new covenant?? Mary was a mere woman chosen for a special purpose. She is not divine nor does she play a role in our salvation. Much of it is merely an add-on belief that builds like a snowball. Jesus warned us about letting such a thing happen. Mary is saint and foremost of all saints, but I don’t believe she is our mother.
You apparently don’t realize that there is an indulgence attached to reading the Bible? It never said that we could not read and the Church does not say that we can not read. What it means is that we should check the Church to see what the Church says and not go around trying to figure it out by ourselves. The reason for this is because you will other wise end up with a whole bunch of different interpretations of the Bible. Which is exactly what we have today. You have people saying you do not have the Holy Spirit unless you speak in tongues. You have people denying the Trinity. You have people who Baptize in the name of Jesus only. You have people who believe that the Eucharist is nothing more than symbolic. If you interpret the Bible without guidance you wind up way out in left field. Jesus left us a Church to help guide us for this very reason. So that we don’t end up way out in left field.If you were correct here, then what would be the purpose for anyone possessing a Bible?? This is where so many Protestants are right about Catholics not reading their Bibles. Why would they if they cannot read and interpret what is being read?? 1 Timothy disproves the whole Magisterium quirk because scripture says to study the word of God so that you will know the truth. It doesn’t say leave it up to a select group of high church officials to know it and pass it down. This is baloney and one big reason why I left the RCC.
I think the children of Joseph is the most likely explanation. I think the “relative” or “cousin” argument is extremely weak.Why was Lot so frequently referred to as Abraham’s ‘brother’ even when it is abundantly clear that he is actually Abraham’s nephew? Same with Laban being referred to as Jacob’s ‘brother’?
Why are ALL of the hundred and twenty odd people in the Upper Room at Pentecost called Jesus’ ‘brothers’?? Surely THEY weren’t His siblings too! (We’d have to invent a new title for Mary for that one!)
None of those cases uses any word for ‘cousin’, ‘friend’ ‘relative’ or anything other than ‘BROTHER’. Clearly it has a broader meaning in the original language.
It makes a bit more sense if you realise that the people of Nazareth didn’t believe in the Virgin Birth - they thought Jesus was Joseph’s son (‘is this not the carpenter’s son?’). In that context OF COURSE any children of Joseph from a previous marriage, for example, would be thought to be His half-siblings and referred to as such.
Actually it does…we are told to “hold fast to the traditions that have been handed on by word and ***letter.” ***you were correct here, then what would be the purpose for anyone posessing a Bible?? This is where so many Protestants are right about Catholics not reading their Bibles. Why would they if they cannot read and interpret what is being read?? 1 Timothy disproves the whole Magisterium quirk because scripture says to study the word of God so that you will know the truth. It doesn’t say leave it up to a select group of high church officials to know it and pass it down. This is baloney and one big reason why I left the RCC.
We do not believe that we can only have the Holy Spirit if we speak in tongues. We absolutely believe in the Trinity. We believe that the Eucharist is the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ. We however do not believe in the authority of Rome and we are Protestant by your definition, so your whole theory doesn’t hold water.You apparently don’t realize that there is an indulgence attached to reading the Bible? It never said that we could not read and the Church does not say that we can not read. What it means is that we should check the Church to see what the Church says and not go around trying to figure it out by ourselves. The reason for this is because you will other wise end up with a whole bunch of different interpretations of the Bible. Which is exactly what we have today. You have people saying you do not have the Holy Spirit unless you speak in tongues. You have people denying the Trinity. You have people who Baptize in the name of Jesus only. You have people who believe that the Eucharist is nothing more than symbolic. If you interpret the Bible without guidance you wind up way out in left field. Jesus left us a Church to help guide us for this very reason. So that we don’t end up way out in left field.
You just pointed it our right there. What tells you that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth? SCRIPTURE tells you! You just said it and I rest my case.Scripture identifies The Church is the “Pillar and foundation of truth” that is what scripture tells us. Scripture does not say that the Bible is the pillar of truth nor does scripture call itself the foundation.
My theory DOES hold water. I personally KNOW Christians who believe some of those things. There was also a news article a few months ago about one of the Episcopalian churches having a vote on whether or not the names of the Trinity should be changed. They were voting on changing Father, Son, and Holy Spirit to something else. I don’t remember what the choices were but I do recall one of them reminded me of rock, paper, scissors.We do not believe that we can only have the Holy Spirit if we speak in tongues. We absolutely believe in the Trinity. We believe that the Eucharist is the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ. We however do not believe in the authority of Rome and we are Protestant by your definition, so your whole theory doesn’t hold water.
Your arrogant insults are not appreciated at least by me. This is proof positive that catholics can say whatever they want about others and it is construed as knowledge but it is always slanderous if it goes the other way. I guess this is your forum so you can do whatever you wish fair or not.My theory DOES hold water. I personally KNOW Christians who believe some of those things. There was also a news article a few months ago about one of the Episcopalian churches having a vote on whether or not the names of the Trinity should be changed. They were voting on changing Father, Son, and Holy Spirit to something else. I don’t remember what the choices were but I do recall one of them reminded me of rock, paper, scissors.
These people show you from the Bible were they get these beliefs from!
We can’t be certain, but John certainly lived a long time and wrote Revelation quite late, so highly likely it was after her death (if indeed she died) and after the Assumption, especially as there are some hints of it in Revelation.Quick question.
Was Revelation written before or after Mary’s death? Just trying to p(name removed by moderator)oint the whole assumption thing.
No, scripture tells YOU - if you rely solely upon it. People of good sense don’t rely solely upon it to tell us about our faith.You just pointed it our right there. What tells you that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth? SCRIPTURE tells you! You just said it and I rest my case.
I am not trying to be arrogant. I’m sorry you took it that way. I’m simply pointing out the facts. That is the way Christianity is today. Whether you like it or not. I certainly don’t like it but that is the way it is. Why do you think people are losing their faith in such numbers, especially here in America? I heard one recent report on the radio that said that in a another year America would no longer be considered a Protestant nation. They did not go on to say what would be the main faith in America so I don’t know the answer to that question.Your arrogant insults are not appreciated at least by me. This is proof positive that catholics can say whatever they want about others and it is construed as knowledge but it is always slanderous if it goes the other way. I guess this is your forum so you can do whatever you wish fair or not.
Bishops, with priests as co-workers, have as their first task “to preach the Gospel of God to all men,” in keeping with the Lord’s command. They are “heralds of faith, who draw new disciples to Christ; they are authentic teachers” of the apostolic faith “endowed with the authority of Christ.”If you were correct here, then what would be the purpose for anyone posessing a Bible?? This is where so many Protestants are right about Catholics not reading their Bibles. Why would they if they cannot read and interpret what is being read?? 1 Timothy disproves the whole Magisterium quirk because scripture says to study the word of God so that you will know the truth. It doesn’t say leave it up to a select group of high church officials to know it and pass it down. This is baloney and one big reason why I left the RCC.
No, scripture tells YOU - if you rely solely upon it. People of good sense don’t rely solely upon it to tell us about our faith.
People of good sense know by using our God-given brains that any book, no matter how God-breathed, can’t possibly be a higher authority on Christ’s teaching than His living, breathing, Holy-Spirit guided church, rather that the two go hand in hand.
Why not? When the bible tells us to OBEY our spiritual leaders because they have authority over us?We however do not believe in the authority of Rome and we are Protestant by your definition, so your whole theory doesn’t hold water.
The woman in Revelation 11-12 is Israel, not Mary. The Sun, Moon, and Stars clearly matches the dream Joseph, son of Jacob had and told his brothers.We can’t be certain, but John certainly lived a long time and wrote Revelation quite late, so highly likely it was after her death (if indeed she died) and after the Assumption, especially as there are some hints of it in Revelation.
You rest your case that scripture tells you that the church is the fountain of truth? Then you should follow the teachings of the church and not rely on your own understanding of scripture which COULD be flawed. Using the bible as their point of reference, Protestants disagree with each other on …You just pointed it our right there. What tells you that the church is the pillar and foundation of truth? SCRIPTURE tells you! You just said it and I rest my case.