Your statements sound as though you were giving your husband permission to be unfaithful by laying out certain conditions.so did you or do you expect your husband to be unfaithfu?l.I certainly don’t expect my husband to violate his wedding vows.
That’s the way it sounded to me, too.Your statements sound as though you were giving your husband permission to be unfaithful by laying out certain conditions.so did you or do you expect your husband to be unfaithfu?l.I certainly don’t expect my husband to violate his wedding vows.
No, I was not giving him permission. I would have taken him to the woodshed. But I also would have been very negative towards the other woman.Your statements sound as though you were giving your husband permission to be unfaithful by laying out certain conditions.so did you or do you expect your husband to be unfaithfu?l.I certainly don’t expect my husband to violate his wedding vows.
Oh, no great direction. I’m just saying white people hate Mother Teresa.
Why are you getting so defensive? I found your statement re the conditions upon which ,you were giving your husband permission to cheat,rather surprising.Isn’t marriage a sacred covenant between man,woman and God?I am not really interested in debating whether a third party involved should be my best friend or not.
I am tired of people blaming the wife. That is what bothers me. Hillary Clinton is not to blame for her husband’s behavior. And anyone wh8o gets upset at her for trying to take down the other woman is full of ****. Begins with cr, not sh.Why are you getting so defensive? I found your statement re the conditions upon which ,you were giving your husband permission to cheat,rather surprising.Isn’t marriage a sacred covenant between man,woman and God?I am not really interested in debating whether a third party involved should be my best friend or not.
My expectation is that my husband remain faithful to me.I can’t say howvI would respond if I found out otherwise.Maybe if it was a momentary lapse in judgement,a one time occourance I would probably be willing to forgive and work through it.However ,as in the case of Hillary and Bill,this pattern of behavior was chronic.No woman would or should put up with that.Especially a supposedly strong independant capable woman like Hillary.No,she put up with it because she had more to lose by moving on than staying.You seem to want to defend her actions.
Now, now. I never said some white people hate Mother Teresa because she’s white, though actual racists might. Some men might hate Hillary because she’s a woman. Some hate her for a variety of other reasons. It’s the level of hate that I find of interest.
As a white person, I do not hate Mother Teresa.
I don’t believe anyone has blamed Hillary for Bill’s sexual abuse of numerous women.However,doesn’t appear as though she really cared either,other than being angry for bring publicsly humiliated especially by the whole Monica Lewinski ordeal. Monica got the best of both Bill and Hillary with her blue dress.
Couldn’t disagree more. The fact that he’s black is basically the only real qualification he brought to the race. Why him over Clinton back in 2008? Their platforms were virtually identical. But one of them was black. So here we are.
Aw come on Lily. It’s no fun nor fair when you derail a claim with facts.
Nice that we get all the extremes here, I guess. Little bit of a preparation for the general.
So you’re saying that being Black trumps being a woman. Therefore, I assume you will agree that in a few months, we’ll find out if being Trump trumps being a woman.
I don’t agree. Obama is, in my opinion, a more eloquent speaker than what Clinton is.
It just evidentiary that being black trumped being a smart and politically connected woman, at least once. I don’t think it will work again.
I voted for Obama 3x. (My state didn’t hold a 2012 Democratic primary.) I voted for Bernie. And I am voting for Hillary in Nov. But I agree Obama is a more eloquent speaker that she is. I think she will be a far better POTUS though than Donald J Trump or anyone the GOP is offering.
Obama certainly does have charisma and a youthful appeal that it is unlikely that Hillary would have had even in her youth.
LOL and with selling snake oil also.
Everyone here is well aware of forum rules,you needn’t remind us.Also your assertions that any discussion re their dysfunctional marriage is assumption and idle gossip is nonsense.If they can’t keep it together for the public eye,I seriously doubt things are any better behind closed doors. They are a couple of power hungry individuals who have put up with each other for political expediency.Really no point in discussing this any further.