Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prodigal_40s said:
The “right wing” media you say? Oh and my Communist “theory” isn’t a theory.

Genderless society, society where all sexual orientations are the same including the ability to procreate children, Common state core education including programmes on sexual acts (sodomy) and sexual orientation to children. Oh and this:

salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/

Oh and this. There are hundreds more examples

latimes.com/nation/la-na-oregon-bakery-wedding-cake-20150703-story.html

abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/banned-live-nativity-indiana-mannequins-35743968
Click to expand...
That’s not communism.
 
Crossbones said:
That’s not communism.
Click to expand...
Yes it is. The dream of the egalitarian society where any dissenters are removed. This is how extreme leftism permeates its way through society by sounding as if it’s “for the good of the people”. Unchecked, this will become a dictatorship. Why do you think Obama’s principal obsession, apart from “rights” is repealing the Second Amendment? Read Alinsksy and you’ll quickly agree. This isn’t a comic book label, it’s based on evidence
 
Well you appear to back the main objective of the Soros foundation so maybe you’ve already bought into the ideology?
 
Prodigal_40s said:
Yes it is. The dream of the egalitarian society where any dissenters are removed. This is how extreme leftism permeates its way through society by sounding as if it’s “for the good of the people”. Unchecked, this will become a dictatorship. Why do you think Obama’s principal obsession, apart from “rights” is repealing the Second Amendment? Read Alinsksy and you’ll quickly agree. This isn’t a comic book label, it’s based on evidence
Click to expand...
It’s not communism. And, President’s Obama’s principal obsession is not repealing the Second Amendment. I’m sorry, your sources for information are incorrect.
 
Prodigal_40s said:
Yes it is. The dream of the egalitarian society where any dissenters are removed. This is how extreme leftism permeates its way through society by sounding as if it’s “for the good of the people”. Unchecked, this will become a dictatorship. Why do you think Obama’s principal obsession, apart from “rights” is repealing the Second Amendment? Read Alinsksy and you’ll quickly agree. This isn’t a comic book label, it’s based on evidence
Click to expand...
Post citations or retract your assertion that Obama’s principal obsession is repealing the Second Amendment.

Frankly, I see no difference between the extreme left desire for “the good of the people”, and the extreme right desire for “the good of the people”. A choice between Castro and Franco is no choice at all.
 
The fact that ALL schools in Virginia were closed is hardly trivial.

As for the article, read it please. Obama wants to disarm the public which is clear from every incident which he uses to fulfill this narrative.

An example of ignoring the facts was when the journalist who shot his colleagues had a rainbow flag in his apartment. Obama didn’t call for the flag to be removed yet this wasn’t the case in Charleston. All this is obvious as are his Alinskyite leanings.

Obama is a far left community organiser who uses any advantage to attack and demonise his political opponents and will manipulate any tragedy to make his point
 
Well, he is sure taking his sweet time about it. Seven years in, and nothing done yet. But he did organize that invasion of Texas where they turned all the Walmarts into detention centers, so that’s something.
 
Prodigal_40s said:
The fact that ALL schools in Virginia were closed is hardly trivial.

As for the article, read it please. Obama wants to disarm the public which is clear from every incident which he uses to fulfill this narrative.

An example of ignoring the facts was when the journalist who shot his colleagues had a rainbow flag in his apartment. Obama didn’t call for the flag to be removed yet this wasn’t the case in Charleston. All this is obvious as are his Alinskyite leanings.

Obama is a far left community organiser who uses any advantage to attack and demonise his political opponents and will manipulate any tragedy to make his point
Click to expand...
The article doesn’t mention anything about “repealing the second amendment”. The sole quote from Obama is him saying:

“Speaking to CBS News, Obama demanded “common-sense gun safety laws” to “eliminate these mass shootings.” He added that he intends to “make it harder for individuals to get access to weapons” and reportedly is preparing to take executive action to do so.”

I’m sure that in the fantasyland of fevered far-right paranoia, the line between “regulation” and “repeal” becomes blurry indeed, but in the real world there is nothing in the article or elsewhere to support your thesis that Obama’s “principal obsession is repealing the Second Amendment.” Indeed, he’s shown the exact same level of obsession with “repealing the second amendment” that Reagan did.

Unless I have some evidence for this statement beyond your suppositions and your incredible ability to read the President’s mind, I’m going to have to call BS and chalk it up to intellectual dishonesty.
 
Darryl_Revok said:
The article doesn’t mention anything about “repealing the second amendment”. The sole quote from Obama is him saying:

“Speaking to CBS News, Obama demanded “common-sense gun safety laws” to “eliminate these mass shootings.” He added that he intends to “make it harder for individuals to get access to weapons” and reportedly is preparing to take executive action to do so.”

I’m sure that in the fantasyland of fevered far-right paranoia, the line between “regulation” and “repeal” becomes blurry indeed, but in the real world there is nothing in the article or elsewhere to support your thesis that Obama’s “principal obsession is repealing the Second Amendment.” Indeed, he’s shown the exact same level of obsession with “repealing the second amendment” that Reagan did.

Unless I have some evidence for this statement beyond your suppositions and your incredible ability to read the President’s mind, I’m going to have to call BS and chalk it up to intellectual dishonesty.
Click to expand...
Ah yes. “The faaaaaaaaar right”. That liberal defence when anyone raises an objection about immigration on the grounds of common sense or in this case very obvious attempts to disarm people whose right is to defend themselves.

You think the Reverend Al’s pal is going to just say it directly? Read his favourite book “Rules for Radicals” and then read about his hero Saul Alinsky. He, so far has done more to persecute Christians as well as restrict individual freedom than any President in US history.
 
Prodigal_40s said:
Ah yes. “The faaaaaaaaar right”. That liberal defence when anyone raises an objection about immigration on the grounds of common sense or in this case very obvious attempts to disarm people whose right is to defend themselves.

You think the Reverend Al’s pal is going to just say it directly? Read his favourite book “Rules for Radicals” and then read about his hero Saul Alinsky. He, so far has done more to persecute Christians as well as restrict individual freedom than any President in US history.
Click to expand...
There are no less than six straw men in this response, where you still have posted no proof for your assertion that, and I quote, Obama’s “principal obsession is repealing the Second Amendment.” No proof, that is, beyond tenuous links, vague supposition, and telepathy.

Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, and Bush all did more to restrict individual freedoms than Obama has. Obama hasn’t rescinded habeas corpus, for instance. Thus, your statement that he’s done more to “restrict individual freedom than any President in US history” is wholly unsupported by the facts. Given your support for your thesis in re: his obsession with repealing the second amendment, I imagine such facts will not be forthcoming.
 
Darryl_Revok said:
There are no less than six straw men in this response, where you still have posted no proof for your assertion that, and I quote, Obama’s “principal obsession is repealing the Second Amendment.” No proof, that is, beyond tenuous links, vague supposition, and telepathy.

Lincoln, Wilson, Roosevelt, and Bush all did more to restrict individual freedoms than Obama has. Obama hasn’t rescinded habeas corpus, for instance. Thus, your statement that he’s done more to “restrict individual freedom than any President in US history” is wholly unsupported by the facts. Given your support for your thesis in re: his obsession with repealing the second amendment, I imagine such facts will not be forthcoming.
Click to expand...
There are no “straw” men. Obama has used people’s deaths to push his agenda. That has been evidenced many times.

Compare with Chatanooga when he didn’t even get out of his chair when those brave marines were gunned down.

Ignore it if you like but the facts are there
 
Prodigal_40s said:
There are no “straw” men. Obama has used people’s deaths to push his agenda. That has been evidenced many times.
Click to expand...
That was President GW Bush:

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof – the smoking gun – that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud. "
 
Crossbones said:
That was President GW Bush:

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof – the smoking gun – that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud. "
Click to expand...
I think Dubya wanted to effect regime change in foreign countries which was a mistake but his intentions were good although the results were disastrous. Obama wants to attack his own people who have different political views. There’s a difference though and you know it. Joe Biden isn’t my favourite but at least he sees Republicans as fellow Americans
 
Prodigal_40s said:
I think Dubya wanted to effect regime change in foreign countries which was a mistake but his intentions were good although the results were disastrous. Obama wants to attack his own people who have different political views. There’s a difference though and you know it. Joe Biden isn’t my favourite but at least he sees Republicans as fellow Americans
Click to expand...
What evidence do you have that Obama ‘wants to attack his own people who have different political views’?

And what’s with the spelling of favorite?
 
I work with someone who is from a former British colony and he thinks that I am the one with the funny accent.
 
I doubt he’s British. After all, with such strong opinions of the communist nature of President Obama, he must be American.
 
stevegravy said:
Ya, and it was fear of being tagged as a profiler, that kept the Muslim Bonney and Clyde from being reported. Like the Obama administration, you see something ….shut up. What did the kid thing would be peoples response walking around in a body bag?
Click to expand...
She was not in a body bag. She was wearing a burqa. I wonder if the people who reported her were just as ignorant about Muslims. If we do not try to learn and understand, we cannot use good judgment in dealing with others who are different from us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top