Donald Trump - Fit for purpose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rothko26
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I came to the conclusion that Donald Trump wasn’t fit to be president back during the GOP Primary when he attacked Carly Fiorina and other candidates on their looks.

Since the election I’m even more convinced he’s not fit to serve.

Congress could remove him based on the 25th Amendment, but it would take a strong majority to go that route and the election of 2020 will be upon us before they succeeded.

Jim
 
The Republicans can’t afford to remove him. He still remains popular with a significant portion of their base. Trump has well and truly caught the GOP between the proverbial rock and hard spot. The odds are stacking against them in the mid-terms, at least in the House, and between the never-ending toothache of Trump and the unpopularity of their tax plan, even some assumed safe Republican Senators may have their issues. Oh yes, and let’s not forget Steve Bannon running around making sure people like Roy Moore get into the Senate.
 
The real rock and hard place that this country is between is the dysfunction of both parties that have a stranglehold on the electorate.It is the very epitome of insanity.We continue to flip flop between the two forever hopeful that somehow thing will be different this time around😳 Which BTW is why Donald Trump,appealed to so many and it wasn’t just Republucans that put him in office.
 
Last edited:
Mueller and his team are like a pack of dogs looking to attack anyone in their sight.
 
Yes indeed.Those who argue that it’s not the Dems but Republicans who for the most part are doing their best to get in Trump’s way may very well have a valid point.Which validates my comments about both parties having a stranglehold on the electorate.Lest the Dems on this board forgot,it was their party ,HC is n particular that sabotaged Bernie Sanders campaign.So it goes both ways.Only difference is,Bernie couldn’t have won.
 
Last edited:
Pretty slow if you ask me. So far no collusion. It was predicted the investigation would be
finished by August.
 
Last edited:
7_Sorrows said:
It sure has taken him a long time to come up with so little.
Click to expand...
Watergate took 2 1/2 years. Real investigations of this type do not move fast. But, if Trump did nothing wrong, he has nothing to worry about.
 
No, he doesn’t. But that is not what the liberals want to hear.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Pretty slow if you ask me. So far no collusion.
Click to expand...
What is your reference, if any, for asserting slowness?

As to collusion:

www.theatlantic.com

Mueller Can Pursue Whatever Crimes He Uncovers

There are no legal or ethical reasons for the special counsel to turn away if he discovers indications of misconduct that are unrelated to the original Russia inquiry.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
Crucially, the order written by Rosenstein establishing the special-counsel investigation is very broad. It states that the special counsel is “authorized to conduct the investigation” that includes “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump” as well as “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.”
Click to expand...
The mandate is very big. it may take some time to get through the mess and to the specific matter of “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
 
The Watergate Investigation took 14 months. Why are you in such a hurry?
 
niceatheist said:
The Watergate Investigation took 14 months. Why are you in such a hurry?
Click to expand...
Judging by human history, He certainly has tolerated those sorts of behaviors. But any rate, at this point I guess this is where you start comparing homosexual acts to eating babies and such. The point to that is whatever God may or may not tolerate, it’s ultimately human societies that put a stop to things that they view is wrong.

At any rate, when it comes to homosexuals marrying, it does me no harm. It doesn’t affect my marriage. It really doesn’t intrude on my life in any significant way at all. Seeing as I don’t believe peoples actions should be merely restrained because an 2,500 year old law book says homosexuality is bad. That book may be right, and if it is, then I guess those that partake of homosexual acts will meet their ultimate fate in the afterlife. That still doesn’t make it mine, or your concern. Both of us should concern ourselves with our own sins, as Jesus himself instructed in Matthew 7:5.
 
Bernie at least didn’t have the baggage that Clinton carried. Even at that Clinton got almost 2.9 million more votes, something Trump and his supporters seem to have a problem with.
 
Last edited:
The directive mentioned nothing about a collusion. Mueller and company were hired to investigate the “coordination” of activities involving Russia and the Trump campaign among other things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top