S
Son_of_Niall
Guest
Very sad.Looks like it. The Spiritus MundI has given the Spiritus Sanctus the boot here, and the Church-hating, red pill-popping brigade are here to stay. An enemy has done this.
Very sad.Looks like it. The Spiritus MundI has given the Spiritus Sanctus the boot here, and the Church-hating, red pill-popping brigade are here to stay. An enemy has done this.
Yeah, I think itâs pretty obvious there was an ulterior motive in this statement from Pope Francis. Itâs too coincidental, especially knowing how he feels about Trump.I am so tired of hearing the excuses that what the Pope said was âmistranslatedâ from Italian into English or was âinaccurately reportedâ by the news media.
So we are supposed to ignore what the Pope said months ago prior to the US election when he said clearly that Trump was not a Christian for wanting to build walls, rather than bridges, and for not wanting to throw open wide the borders of the US to refugees and immigrants.
No other pope as far back as I can remember has had this type of mis-translation problem and inaccurate reporting problem as the âdifficultiesâ Pope Francis is having.
The Vatican is in Italy. You can just cross into the Vatican from Rome without a passport.Let the Pope lead by example then. Tear down the walls to the Vatican See and dismiss the Swiss Guard. Show us here in America how it is done Pope Francis; tear down that wall.
As for the Popeâs quote, I would suggest that there is a huge difference between laws, justice and accountability vs. vengeance, revenge and retribution. Actions have consequences.
As far as I am concerned, the Pope is squandering his moral authority by his forays into political rhetoric and agendas. There is little remaining now and soon there will be none.
You people just canât help yourselves can you?Yeah, I think itâs pretty obvious there was an ulterior motive in this statement from Pope Francis. Itâs too coincidental, especially knowing how he feels about Trump.
Donât try to twist things. This is a ridiculous statement given all I stated is it was obvious there was an underlying message against Trump. I am not obligated to have the same politics as the Pope. This is not a matter of Church doctrine.You people just canât help yourselves can you?
Choosing Trump over the Vicar of Christ.
I donât care if I am ridiculed, mocked, attacked, or whatever. I posted a well-considered article on St. Thomas and what the Catholic response should be to refugees and to immigration. I have posted many thoughtful comments and references to many blogs, articles, news reports and the like. Most of my postings are disregarded. Crickets. Silence. I do not expect to influence or change the minds of the liberal and secular left. What I may do is get those in the middle and those who are undecided thinking critically about the topics that are of great importance to all of us as Catholics and as Americans.Building the wall is not anti-Christian. Itâs pro-Christian and pro-Catholic.
Also, you did not attack the Pope. I am sorry that some accounts on here have accused you of doing so, but understand itâs the same thing as waving the white flag. Take it as a a compliment.
It is refreshing to see comments that are not falling the gimmicks of the secular left.
Is the Pope really saying that though?Itâs not surprising that our Pope would take that view, but this is a matter where itâs his opinion, not something that weâre required to agree with. We must remember that Pope Francisâs birth name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio and that he is from Argentina. Itâs no wonder that he is going to feel it unfair and un-Christian to build a wall keeping Mexicans out of the US. He pretty consistently backs socialist policies. Unfortunately, he should probably not be using his position of power to push his political views. It is unrealistic to expect the US to just keep allowing ILLEGAL immigrants to enter our country and allow them to get a free ride off of our programs.
Yes you can pass into St Peterâs Square and enter the Basilica, but you cannot just walk into the gardens or wander Vatican City as you want. There are also security checkpoints that control access so outside of St Peterâs Square it is not a porous border.The Vatican is in Italy. You can just cross into the Vatican from Rome without a passport.
Walls serve another important purpose beyond physical defense. They serve to control access and to delineate sovereign boundaries. The two things are linked. When crossing a sovereign boundary you should become aware that you must respect the laws, culture, and traditions of that country. Try to enter Vatican City wearing a halter top and a mini skirt and see if they are nearly as open as many pretend they are. How does the Vatican enforce those standards with millions of visitors and a small staff? Controlled access through a small number of entrances.So the wall is supposed to be to protect the Vatican from Romans? Or maybe it was constructed in the middle ages when many city states had walls?
Care to explain who the wolves in our church are?Jesus said that in the last days there would be wolves disguised in sheepâs clothing that would seek to destroy the flock. I truly believe we are seeing Jesusâ words unfold before our eyes. I hear a snarl and a growl â a very loud and persistent snarl and growl. I do not hear the voice of the shepherd. I have no desire to be torn to shreds by the wolves that have taken up residence in the church, in our colleges, in our institutions and in our government. I have no desire to accompany the deceiver into the bowels of hell. Evil is not good and good is not evil; and it doesnât matter who tries to convince me otherwise.
I donât know who the poster is referring to but you know as well as I do that the rules here are that you cannot directly criticise members of the clergy if that indeed is who the poster means.Care to explain who the wolves in our church are?
No, whatâs disgraceful is the obvious winking at disparagement of the Churchâs hierarchy. Itâs actually more than disgraceful: itâs disgusting.I donât know who the poster is referring to but you know as well as I do that the rules here are that you cannot directly criticise members of the clergy if that indeed is who the poster means.
You trying to bait him into breaking forum rules is disgraceful.
3 Dog Night has every right to voice his concerns about the church he has come to love and wishes to defend.No, whatâs disgraceful is the obvious winking at disparagement of the Churchâs hierarchy. Itâs actually more than disgraceful: itâs disgusting.
What I find disgusting is cowardice, and that should be the business of any Catholic who is tired of shameless innuendoes made against Holy Mother Church on a Catholic forum. Youâre aware that you canât directly call out clergy so instead you offer feeble insinuations and back-handed calumny. Instead, perhaps you should consider why youâre not permitted to directly attack the Churchâs hierarchy here and either accept it or leave.3 Dog Night has every right to voice his concerns about the church he has come to love and wishes to defend.
He is not winking at anything. He is being extremely sober in his assessment at the direction of the church and obviously his heart is filled with frustration and sadness in having to post.
Quite literally there are millions of Catholics filled with frustration and sadness in the same way and are voicing concernsâŚ
If you find that disgusting then that is your business. He is not going to be silenced either because you are disgusted at some âwinkingâ or in your attempts to be get him to criticise members of the clergy against forum rules so that you can be even more disgusted.
Typical Trumpster garbage. There are not âmillions of Catholics filled with frustration and sadnessâ. Just you and your little group of right-wing Trads.3 Dog Night has every right to voice his concerns about the church he has come to love and wishes to defend.
He is not winking at anything. He is being extremely sober in his assessment at the direction of the church and obviously his heart is filled with frustration and sadness in having to post.
Quite literally there are millions of Catholics filled with frustration and sadness in the same way and are voicing concernsâŚ
If you find that disgusting then that is your business. He is not going to be silenced either because you are disgusted at some âwinkingâ or in your attempts to be get him to criticise members of the clergy against forum rules so that you can be even more disgusted.
Labelling anyone who voted for Trump as a âright-wing Tradâ is highly inaccurate.Typical Trumpster garbage. There are not âmillions of Catholics filled with frustration and sadnessâ. Just you and your little group of** right-wing Trads. **
We will stand by the Church.
Not sure what youâre standing by.
â3 Dog Nightâ mentioned âwolves that have taken up residence in the church,â to which he was asked to elaborate.Labelling anyone who voted for Trump as a âright-wing Tradâ is highly inaccurate.
Who should an American Catholic have voted for? Explain why Hillary Clinton would be a good defender of the faith.
Wasnât there a story about Saint Francis and a wolf? I remember it vaguely from my school daysâŚâ3 Dog Nightâ mentioned âwolves that have taken up residence in the church,â to which he was asked to elaborate.
He has yet to do so.