Don't Support Devilish Music(Rock Music)!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BintuluChuchGuy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Umm, LaVey’s opinion was that rock music was probably NOT inherently Satanic. Am I missing something here? How is that agreeing with the Popes, who’d probably say the contrary? Did LaVey at any stage claim that Gregorian Chant was the devil’s least favourite form of music or something?
No, what he was saying was that even the high priest of the Church of Satan claimed that Satan’s favorite music probably wasn’t rock and roll. I saw that interview a long time ago and am looking for it now on YouTube. Anyway, if you listen to LaVey’s music, it’s all silly electric organ pieces, more fit for an Ed Wood movie than the soundtrack for the Apocalypse.

LaVey, as far as I know, appreciated classical music, as did the popes in question. That’s the only point being made here.

I read the Satanic Bible and don’t recall any mention of music in particular, though it was basically a self-help book for the greedy and selfish.
 
Ah, I understand. I guess I couldn’t have been farther from the mark, eh? I like to learn about the origin of words and how they differ through the years.

Popular music, no matter what the genre, has always been condemned by people who either don’t understand or appreciate it. Hitler was quoted as calling jazz ‘savage negro noise.’
 
Pope Benedict said rock music sucks. Three chord progression doesn’t excite the mind. What y’all think?
 
Pope Benedict said rock music sucks. Three chord progression doesn’t excite the mind. What y’all think?
I think you’re trying to stir the pot. 😛

Not all rock is limited to three chords. Try listening to Dream Theater. 😉
 
Pope John Paul II:
You say the answer is blowing in the wind, my friend. So it is: but it is not the wind that blows things away, it is the breath and life of the Holy Spirit, the voice that calls and says, Come! You ask me how many roads a man must walk down before he becomes a man. I answer: there is only one road for man, and it is the road of Jesus Christ, who said, ‘I am the Way and the Life.’
 
About rock music? Why not. I’m sure he didn’t claim to be any expert on it, or even to know more than the average music student.

I’d imagine he didn’t claim to be an expert on football, quantum theory or the lesser-known works of Charlotte Bronte either. 😛
I don’t know about anyone else, but I find this comment incredible.

When Catholics faithful to Tradition find problems with some of the things that the recent popes have done, they are labeled as schismatics, Lutherans, disobedient, or whatever else relates to these. We say that the pope, not being infallible in all things, can make mistakes in his teachings (such as, for example, the prudential opinion of JPII on the death penalty, which clearly seems to contradict previous teaching). But we are still labeled as disobedient, because we apparently have to obey the pope blindly as if they cannot sin.

But when it comes to rock music, well, the pope is just expressing an opinion. He’s not claiming to be an expert in it, even though music can often be a huge part of the liturgy, and that the pope, in all likelihood, knows more about it than do the majority of Catholics.

Does anyone see what is wrong here?

This is why I truly believe that if the Pope were to mandate Communion on the tongue and the Tridentine mass, many, though not all, of the “faithful to the pope” Catholics would not obey. They are faithful only insofar as they can continue serving both God and man. Heck, look at how communion in the hand was introduced. The popes didn’t want it, and they merely tolerated it through an indult.
Elevation to the Papcy doesn’t make one omniscient.
So we can dismiss something that we personally think the pope “isn’t knowledgable” about? Or can we pick and choose the teachings of the pre-Vatican II popes that contradict modern teaching?

Perhaps the “obedient to the pope” Catholics should also be obedient to previous popes as well by not wanting or allowing anything other than the music they prescribed for the Liturgy.

Please note that I’m not attributing all these things to you, but your comment seemed to express this general attitude I described.
 
Pope Benedict said rock music sucks. Three chord progression doesn’t excite the mind. What y’all think?
I like three chord punk rock sometimes; it helps get me going but no, it doesn’t take a lot of talent. That’s the reason that when a punk band actually learns how to construct a song, they cease to be punk. Talent and/or ability banishes that aggresive simplicity.
 
It was, though “Eurocentric” is a label I don’t mind wearing 🙂
LOL! Again, thanks for shooting yourself in the foot. Euro-centrism is a cultural bias. You could be black, white, yellow, or orange for all I care. If you think medieval European culture (with its deadpan boring classics and pompous etiquette) trumps all others as other cultural idiots say about their own fave cultures (be it Greek, Chinese, German, Japanese, Indian etc), you are being culturally biased, not racially. Take a hint. Use your head.
I suppose; after all, tolerance is a one-way street and modernists preach big but practice little. Not that I am surprised, mind you.
You really like flattering yourself don’t you? Who says I’m being intolerant of your musical tastes? I’m being intolerant towards your intolerant elevating of your tastes. Again, know the diff.
Because God, of course, gave you a divine right to do what you please, yes?

Your understanding of Medieval authority is pathetic.
Says a guy who thinks he knows more about my own country’s medieval history when the Spanish started destroying our culture with their “civilized” European one.

Oh and btw? Here’s the Divine Right of Kings in a nutshell.
The Divine Right of Kings is a political and religious doctrine of royal absolutism. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving his right to rule directly from the will of God. The king is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the realm, including the church. According to this doctrine, since only God can judge an unjust king, the king can do no wrong. The doctrine implies that any attempt to depose the king or to restrict his powers runs contrary to the will of God and may constitute heresy.
If a king is not subject to criticism, even from the Church and is an unjust tyrant, I would certainly be one of those who’d convert to democracy. If going against such dictators is tantamount to crime then feel free to call me Robin. :cool:
I thought we were discussing Medieval Europe, not the American South.

Besides, I’d tell it to a black person easily. Slavery, at least in America, is a done deal.
Got this passage from Wikipedia and if you look it up yourself, you’ll find that it already cites it sources so its legit:
In the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, founded in 1099, at most 120,000 Franks ruled over 350,000 Muslims, Jews, and native Eastern Christians. Following the initial invasion and conquest, sometimes accompanied by massacres or expulsions of Jews and Muslims, a peaceable co-existence between followers of the three religions prevailed. The Crusader states inherited many slaves. To this may have been added some Muslims taken as captives of war. The Kingdom’s largest city, Acre, had a large slave market; however, the vast majority of Muslims and Jews remained free. The laws of Jerusalem declared that former Muslim slaves, if genuine converts to Christianity, must be freed. In 1120, the Council of Nablus forbade sexual relations between crusaders and their female slaves: if a man raped his own slave, he would be castrated, but if he raped someone else’s slave, he would be castrated and exiled from the kingdom.
Infidelity is a sin of lust, which we’ll always have with us. But in an era of much more widespread prostitution and the internet, infidelity is even easier.
Tell that to Shakespeare. :rolleyes:
 
The Third Crusade was a failure, like all that followed the First. Secular lords and power squabbles took away from a genuinely noble mission, the relief of persecuted Christians. If that is barbarism in your eyes, just call me Conan 🙂
Does not in any way cleanse the corruption that was rampant during those times. Your original claim was that your classics came from such times and you uphold those times to better than any civilization that had existed. Face it, your precious medieval period was just as messed up as any other so quit using it as a reason to put your music on a pedestal.
I know the Medieval era was often depraved. Turn of the millenium Europe was a real gem. But, the “Age of Faith” was not named so for no reason, and the High Middle Ages paint a picture of Catholic civilization that would make any modernist hold his head in shame. Again, I refer you to Pernoud, Carroll, and Belloc.

And I have studied this on the academic level as well, not that it is any of your concern.
Really? I hear that “Europe” also included its colonies back then. Again, I would just loooove to cite my history textbook on how wonderful those “turn of the century Spaniards” were. Oh, and I think I may even have a photocopy regarding the British domination of India somewhere around here. You should read stuff like that sometimes, it might fix those rose-tinted (or should I say stained?) glasses you have whenever you look for something about those times.

Going back to the medieval period, I find the pictures painted by Miguel de Cervantes (and perhaps Monty Python) to be more believable. Such periods wouldn’t have died out if they didn’t have flaws that defied reason and democracy.
Who said it wasn’t? Again with the assumptions about us “crackers”. I bet you think you know everything about White folks.
Wow, and who was playing the race card again? Its nice how you think the Church is universal yet claim that the medieval civilization of ignorant monarchies and bumbling chivalry somehow embodies it. Its like saying the kung fu culture embodies Buddhism or something. :rolleyes:
Those who did were labeled by secular jerks, not the religious, who cared for lepers and the poor. Much like secularists today, we can thank them for the worst.
Does not change the fact of arbitrariness. Standards of morality =/= standards of art.
You can prove the former, but if you even just had the slightest taste of studying semiotics (be it via linguistics, literary theory, art theory etc), you’d be hard pressed to prove the latter.
Very naive to trust historians so blindly. Besides, I was talking about the pope’s learned opinions on music, not your country.
Oh so assuming to know more than the Pope on a subject that he actually may not be knowledgeable about is tantamount to heresy or something? Wow gee, I didn’t know we Catholics are suppose to make him god-like and all knowing. :rolleyes:

Just because he’s the Pope doesn’t mean every tiny aspect of our lives (and of human civilization) is in his jurisdiction. I certainly don’t look to him as an authority on science, cooking, literature, fashion (or even gaming, comics, and fantasy fiction). The only exception is when he’s actually proven to be an expert in those fields (not that any human being is capable of being an expert on everything).
I might as well require you to prove you know more about the Middle Ages than actual scholars in the field (not cultural Marxists in a university and not someone who happened to take a few classes that in all likelihood were taught by such), but you already think you do, so there’s no point discussing this with you any further.
LOL! I attend a Jesuit university mister. Despite finding a lot of pro-Catholic stuff in their library, they’re not shy of exposing the medieval mistreatment European colonizers gave the “savages”. Fun Phil. History fact: Spanish rule started here roughly around the 1500s and lasted for about 300 years. That covers a lot of years and a lot of things your so-called “civilized” European culture did to my country.
So, it’s ego, then. Interesting. Unsurprising, but interesting.

Well, go feed your ego somewhere else. I’m done with our argument.
snores and holds up mirror
 
I don’t know about anyone else, but I find this comment incredible.

When Catholics faithful to Tradition find problems with some of the things that the recent popes have done, they are labeled as schismatics, Lutherans, disobedient, or whatever else relates to these. We say that the pope, not being infallible in all things, can make mistakes in his teachings (such as, for example, the prudential opinion of JPII on the death penalty, which clearly seems to contradict previous teaching). But we are still labeled as disobedient, because we apparently have to obey the pope blindly as if they cannot sin.

But when it comes to rock music, well, the pope is just expressing an opinion. He’s not claiming to be an expert in it, even though music can often be a huge part of the liturgy, and that the pope, in all likelihood, knows more about it than do the majority of Catholics.

Does anyone see what is wrong here?

This is why I truly believe that if the Pope were to mandate Communion on the tongue and the Tridentine mass, many, though not all, of the “faithful to the pope” Catholics would not obey. They are faithful only insofar as they can continue serving both God and man. Heck, look at how communion in the hand was introduced. The popes didn’t want it, and they merely tolerated it through an indult.
I’m not one of those who demands everyone blindly accept JP2’s ideas on the death penalty - I don’t personally know of anyone who does, although of course plenty of people are against it for many other reasons and so are sympathetic to his distaste for it.

I don’t know what other prudential teachings you are referring to. I do know that Church teaching on music is a widely different matter to someting like granting an indult for COTT. That is a matter of formal permission being granted.

I don’t think Popes are so swayed by disobedience as you would think. Numerous womens’ ordinations have been attempted over the years, large numbers of the clergy openly dissent with church teaching on ABC, abortion, homosexuality and the like - and openly act in ways that make their dissent clear. None of this mass disobedience has resulted in the dissenting behaviour being formally approved of!

And the Popes views on music are unlike other disciplinary liturgical matters - they haven’t been enshrined in the GIRM or other official documents setting the rubrics for liturgy, for example, or specifically addressed and made the subject of disciplinary procedures like those outlined for other types of liturgical abuse.
So we can dismiss something that we personally think the pope “isn’t knowledgable” about? Or can we pick and choose the teachings of the pre-Vatican II popes that contradict modern teaching?
Well, if a politician has a view that women shouldn’t vote but neither succeeds nor even tries in getting a law enacted that forbids their doing so, then yes, I think we can be safe in dismissing that politician’s views. And, as far as I am aware, neither of these Pontiffs ever even attempted to regulate Church music to the extent of putting these documents into action. Shows that even they didn’t take them that seriously, since they surely had the power to do so if they were so convicted of the rightness of their views.
Perhaps the “obedient to the pope” Catholics should also be obedient to previous popes as well by not wanting or allowing anything other than the music they prescribed for the Liturgy.
Why? The law currently outlaws slavery - why should we be obedient to previous laws that permitted it? The law currently allows women to vote - why should we be obedient to previous laws that didn’t? Why should we even give credence to the rationales that were put forward for such obviously wrong things as slavery and denying women the right to participate in government?
 
Lost Wanderer & Lycorth, I think you need to tell each other how you really feel. 😉
 
Lost Wanderer & Lycorth, I think you need to tell each other how you really feel. 😉
Hey don’t look at me. He’s the one holding up the medieval times like they were the best thing that’s ever happened. :rolleyes: Seeing what that civilization did to my own nation’s cultural heritage though simply makes me wanna correct that.
 
LilyM - completely off-topic, but I just went through almost the whole thread on the thread about Our Lady being Mother of God, and the idea of “grandmother,” and I thoroughly enjoyed much of your statements. Although I do not know why you mentioned Mary going through labor - Mary did not suffer any pains of childbirth. This is confirmed by Trent.
 
I don’t think that all rock musicians are involved in Satanism but some of them are. That is sad. We should pray for them.
 
I don’t even know how you can say that :confused:
I guess my temporal lobe isn’t shaped like Rosalyn Carter.

Sorry. Couldn’t resist. 😛

No, but seriously. The Mars Volta are intentionally terrible as a joke against people who listen to them. They’re awful.
 
LilyM - completely off-topic, but I just went through almost the whole thread on the thread about Our Lady being Mother of God, and the idea of “grandmother,” and I thoroughly enjoyed much of your statements. Although I do not know why you mentioned Mary going through labor - Mary did not suffer any pains of childbirth. This is confirmed by Trent.
I’ve just gone through all the Canons and Decrees of Trent and see little mention of Mary anwyhere, let alone any indication that she gave birth without pain. Where is it stated that she did?
 
I guess my temporal lobe isn’t shaped like Rosalyn Carter.

Sorry. Couldn’t resist. 😛

No, but seriously. The Mars Volta are intentionally terrible as a joke against people who listen to them. They’re awful.
Never heard a man speak like this man before, all the days of my life ever since I been born!

Couldn’t resist replying in some lyrics either 😛

I don’t understand. They are one of the greats in the past 10 years of prog rock! The Bedlam in Goliath is just a ridiculously great album.

What do you make of say, Fall of Troy (more mathcore but still prog), The Sound of Animals Fighting?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top