E
eptatorata
Guest
Philthy, I call them as I see them. If you don’t wish to burdened with a third party’s opinion, don’t conduct a conversation in public.
How so? Sam is suggesting that there is no true free choice since no one would choose a sinful life and suffer damnation willingly. Well, if you look towards society, there are obviously those who do exactly that. So, there is a choice made by individuals else society, by enlarge, would not be as immoral as it currently is. I know it is hard to believe, yet many are using their free choice to willingly sin against God. I don’t understand it either.You just reinforced SamCA’s point…
I’m sorry - I think I will just keep my mouth shut for a bit. I, too, was offended at your characterization of Catholic belief and reacted defensively. The Jesus Christ I know does not love me one bit more than you or anyone else. Again, I’m sorry.Philthy,
Your attempt at sarcasm was poor, insensitive, and extremely insulting.
I can only shake my head at such comments.
clarkal
Have you experimentally verified this yourself or do you accept the testimony of others - ie you take it on faith?Yes, but E*t > h (uncertainty principle, h being the Planck constant, may have forgotten a 2pi somewhere, but that doesn’t matter for this argument), so if t (time) is near zero, the energy uncertainty can be anything.
So, in a space-time singularity the energy uncertainty can produce any amount of matter, a universe like this one e.g.
Yes there is when you do so under the false claim of the “scientific method” which, if I’m not mistaken, is JohnDurans point. How you want the world to be has nothing to do with science. Once you have adopted a view which is unsubstantiated by scientific observation you no longer can lay claim to the objectivity which is at the root of scientific investigation - you have become subjective.There’s nothing wrong with having an idea of how one wants the world to be and concocting a matching theory to fit the facts.
Mijoy2:![]()
If what you are saying is that I have a grip on the Faith, but you have a deeper understanding, I ask you to help me along. I’m sure you know how to private message.Is it a fair deal that I have a severe difficulty in expressing matters while you may have a great way of expression but see these matters in hazy outlines that you know somehow make sense but have yet to become more familiar with the exquisite thinking of the authors of Genesis.
.
I Thank you all. I wish to be further enlightened.
no, that is a tattoo, or maybe some marker or somthing…If someone bears the name of Allah on his chest, that is… coincidence, a fraud, nuts,…?
Yes, I have done several experiments myself or participated at some (e.g. at DESY’s ZEUS detector desy.de/html/home/fastnavigator.html). But of course, I have accepted a lot of “testimonies” of other people to learn the necessary background. In theory everyone can reproduce those testimonies.Have you experimentally verified this yourself or do you accept the testimony of others - ie you take it on faith?
Not necessary, it is a valid question.I apologize, in advance, if I have offended by this remark.
Well, if there was a LOVING and JUST God, then purgatory is a logical solution of that dilemma you stated. The protestant view of Hell otoh, is completely illogical.I don’t want anyone gonig to hell. But I don’t think it’s fair for a person who sins, even to the extreme like murder or rape, gets forgiven and gets into heaven, and for a person who barely sins and goes to confession like every week or so, and gets the same reward “heaven”. We all might as well just sin!!!. I don’t think thats very fair, or is thats why there’s Purgatory? And what is Purgatory like? somewhere along the lines of hell?
no, that is a tattoo, or maybe some marker or somthing…![]()
What pragmatic Catholics will see is that your relativistic/qm goobledegook is big business.Yes, I have done several experiments myself or participated at some (e.g. at DESY’s ZEUS detector desy.de/html/home/fastnavigator.html). But of course, I have accepted a lot of “testimonies” of other people to learn the necessary background. In theory everyone can reproduce those testimonies.
You perform a related experiment everyday. The principle behind a laser is pure quantum physics. If quantum physics were not true, the CD or DVD drive in your computer won’t work.
.
Ah.I’m sorry - I think I will just keep my mouth shut for a bit. I, too, was offended at your characterization of Catholic belief and reacted defensively. The Jesus Christ I know does not love me one bit more than you or anyone else. Again, I’m sorry.
Phil
i’m not sure what you’re getting at here…I’m curious why John Doran doesn’t quiz the theists on their epistemology…
i’m not sure i understand; are you suggesting that the eternally present conditions could cause an effect, and then cause a different effect again at some later date, and so on? if so, then that doesn’t actually work, since, during the period before the subsequent effects came into existence, the conditions couldn’t have been necessary and sufficient, since, if they were, then the effect would also have existed.And what if the cause is periodic? Then it could be eternal and cause finite effects.
because the child, by definition, freely chose to do the wrong thing.You miss the point. You already know absolutely everything there is to know about the child, from birth to death. You can also change any event or any thought the child will ever have at a whim. In other words, you have complete foreknowledge and complete control over the child’s life experience, whether you exercise the control or not.
Why would you punish the child for anything?
It is fine to be a pretensious idiot,what is not o.k. is to call yourself a Christian while you are doing it.i’m not sure i understand; are you suggesting that the eternally present conditions could cause an effect, and then cause a different effect again at some later date, and so on? if so, then that doesn’t actually work, since, during the period before the subsequent effects came into existence, the conditions couldn’t have been necessary and sufficient, since, if they were, then the effect would also have existed.
the only way to motivate your suggestion would be if the conditions themselves only became sufficient and/or necessary at some point in time. but then, what would cause that change in the conditions? and was that cause eternally present? if so, then the change would have been eternal, also. if not, then what caused it?
and so on…
out of curiosity, how do you think we will we know? how will we know? facts about that period of the life of the universe are, after all, emprically unverifiable…No argument from me. I mean, in a decade or two (or a hundred) we will know about those early stages of the universe, we do not know about yet.
Bah, it took 350 years to find a proof for Fermat’s Theorem. The early universe’s cosmology is analysed for only 50 years now, give it a decade or two…
I have made no claim about determinism.because the child, by definition, freely chose to do the wrong thing.
unless the point of your example is that god’s universal causal power entails determinism, in which case it seems to make no sense to punish someone for something they were incapable of not doing…
in which case, i agree: why punish them?
i just don’t agree that determinism is entailed by divine causal efficacy.