Doubts about Hell, suffering. Please Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hermione
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
oriel36:
…It is wrong for Catholics to place emphasis on hell…
Oriel–

Here are some more thoughts that I had.

I agree that too much emphasis is not healthy.

Then again, one must recognize the truth and accept it.

I found this article intersting…

“A Hell There Is!”

catholic.com/library/Hell_There_Is.asp

What do you think?

Please advise.

Yours friend in Christ,

–Mark
 
40.png
mkamoski:
Oriel36–

This link to an answer in the “Ask An Apologetic” may help to shed some light and better explain some of what I was trying to paraphrase.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=47098

Regarding “solemnity”, perhaps I have been misread. I certainly did not mean to imply hell was anything such.

Eternal separation from God, to be forever without love, and so on, would most certainly painful to one’s soul and body. Hell is real and hell is eternal. Those are simply facts revealed thus far. Who is in hell? To date, no one seems to know.

However, I agree that one can overemphasize negative concepts.

In the end, it seems there is a middle-ground for the Catholic, far from Presumption but also far from Despair. Balance, yet again.

The good news is Christ.

Yours in Christ Jesus,

–Mark
Trotting ou the slogans of eternal hell and eternal punishment and seperated from God must be a great imperative for those who have fire and brimstone theologies but heaven and hell are valid and very real conditions in the progress of a Christian soul who sometimes has to live at the edge of despair or unbelief.The Theologia is a beautiful jewel of Apostolic literature in presenting how terms such as heaven/hell,light/darkness ect are alive with meaning for our daily existence and far from the imaginative and cartoon terms which externalise them in terms of rewards and punishment.

As for facts,simple or otherwise, the experience of God in our temporal existence and extending into Eternity requires that hell (knowing how destructive self will can be) is more sought after than heaven for without the depths how should we know the heights of Christian existence .
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
You may call that a miracle, I call that self-inflicted wounds in religious delusion. Then some stories were made up or exaggerated to sell that miracle to the public. And big business it is: padrepioshrine.com/Padre_Pio_Blessing_Oil.htm

Oh, wait, they don’t sell it, they ask for a donation:whistle:
well, you certainly figured it out, and you must be amazingly smart to have fully researched it for about all of 5 minutes…!!!

if you go to hell, it will be certainly because your a fool…

Hell is a choice after all…

Peace be to you…
 
40.png
TheGarg:
well, you certainly figured it out, and you must be amazingly smart to have fully researched it for about all of 5 minutes…!!!
The other obvious possibility is amazing gullibility on the other side. If you personally accept these miracles, how much research have you done to ascertain the veracity of them?
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
You may call that a miracle, I call that self-inflicted wounds in religious delusion. Then some stories were made up or exaggerated to sell that miracle to the public. And big business it is: padrepioshrine.com/Padre_Pio_Blessing_Oil.htm

Oh, wait, they don’t sell it, they ask for a donation:whistle:
Self inflicted wounds don’t magically heal completely one day after death. The day he died they were still present, the next day they had completely disappeared. How do you explain them apples ??

Doctors examined the wounds but as always folks like you can come up with conspiracy theories even if you witnessed it yourself.

As Darth Vader says " I find your lack of faith, disturbung…"
 
40.png
eptatorata:
The other obvious possibility is amazing gullibility on the other side. If you personally accept these miracles, how much research have you done to ascertain the veracity of them?
And a great deal of selective perception. If someone bears stigmata, it’s a miracle. If someone bears the name of Allah on his chest, that is… coincidence, a fraud, nuts,…?

If someone sees Mary somewhere, it’s a miracle.
If someone sees Leprechauns, he’s what? Hallucinating, drug addicted, nuts?
 
AnAtheist,
As an atheist, you would deny the existence of God, correct? I’m just curious how you justify our existence? Something cannot come from nothing. How could everything in the known and unknown universe be here if it were not created by a supreme being? Everything needs a beginning. Please tell me your theory for how the universe began?

Also, do you ever worry about what will happen to you when you die? Are you ever lacking in hope? When you reach your death bed, do you think there could be an overwhelming feeling of “is this all there is?” I ask this because if I didn’t have faith in God, it would seem to be such a sad and scary existence.
 
40.png
SamCA:
If you told your child, “If you disobey, I will kill you. You are choosing between life and death.” and then killed him after he disobeyed you, you would be universally decried as a monster.
And what would you think would happen if you said to your child…" go on son go do what you please as you please. because no matter what you do i will never punish you"? i think a lot of people would be discribbing your child as a monster as well. Anyway, doesn’t God do what all good parents do and accept their childs apology when the child realizes that he has done wrong?
 
40.png
misterX:
And what would you think would happen if you said to your child…" go on son go do what you please as you please. because no matter what you do i will never punish you"? i think a lot of people would be discribbing your child as a monster as well. Anyway, doesn’t God do what all good parents do and accept their childs apology when the child realizes that he has done wrong?
What an extended analogy. If as a parent, you had perfect foreknowledge of every thought and action of your child and the power to change literally anything at will, be it the child’s environment or its thoughts, then what’s the point of punishment if not self-gratification?
 
40.png
nasdravie:
Something cannot come from nothing.
Yes, it can. Quantum physics shows how.
How could everything in the known and unknown universe be here if it were not created by a supreme being? Everything needs a beginning. Please tell me your theory for how the universe began?
Is that so? Then tell me your theory for how this supreme being began. Your answer is my answer (plus some modern cosmology).
Also, do you ever worry about what will happen to you when you die?
No. Death is a part of life. Why should I worry about it?
Are you ever lacking in hope? When you reach your death bed, do you think there could be an overwhelming feeling of “is this all there is?” I ask this because if I didn’t have faith in God, it would seem to be such a sad and scary existence.
Well, hope for what? I don’t have that feeling now, can’t say what happens at my death bed. I find the thought of a completely purposeless existence quite conformting, but I understand if that’s frightening you.
 
40.png
eptatorata:
Alleged miracles must be accepted on faith?
Please explain how the wounds suddenly disappeared ?

IF it is NOT a miracle then it must have a scientific explanation.

IF it is a impossiblity then it must be a miracle. Isn’t that what the definition of what a miracle is ???
 
40.png
Genesis315:
Don’t you need energy to create matter?
Yes, but E*t > h (uncertainty principle, h being the Planck constant, may have forgotten a 2pi somewhere, but that doesn’t matter for this argument), so if t (time) is near zero, the energy uncertainty can be anything.
So, in a space-time singularity the energy uncertainty can produce any amount of matter, a universe like this one e.g.
 
40.png
wcknight:
Please explain how the wounds suddenly disappeared ?
The miracle is your claim, not mine. If you wish to convince me, it’s not up to me to show you wrong, but you have to show me that you are right.
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Yes, it can. Quantum physics shows how.
no, it doesn’t. the quantum vacuum is not “nothing”.
40.png
AnAtheist:
Is that so? Then tell me your theory for how this supreme being began. Your answer is my answer (plus some modern cosmology).
i think we’ve been down this road before: god is necessary and thus didn’t begin to exist. the universe did begin to exist, and is thus in need of a cause of its existence.
 
40.png
eptatorata:
The other obvious possibility is amazing gullibility on the other side. If you personally accept these miracles, how much research have you done to ascertain the veracity of them?
if you personally reject miracles, how much research have you done to ensure that there is, in fact, a reasonable naturalistic explanation forthcoming?
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Yes, but E*t > h (uncertainty principle, h being the Planck constant, may have forgotten a 2pi somewhere, but that doesn’t matter for this argument), so if t (time) is near zero, the energy uncertainty can be anything.
So, in a space-time singularity the energy uncertainty can produce any amount of matter, a universe like this one e.g.
which cosmological model are you referring to here? tryon’s vacuum fluctuation model? or linde’s chaotic inflationary model?

sounds sort of like the first, since it sounds like you are suggesting that the universe could be a giant virtual particle. if so, that particular model has failed the very empirical tests you hold in such high epistemological esteem, and has been abandoned by the (bulk of) the scientific community.

people have been trying to avoid the initial singularity for decades, and none have managed. it seems odd to cling to some kind of hope that someone will eventually succeed - science doesn’t work that way: it’s not a search for the way we want the world to be - it’s a quest to understand the way the world is, for better or worse. i mean, approaching it in the former manner would be like spending your life looking for the philosopher’s stone because you really, really want there to be some way to tun lead into gold.
 
john doran:
if you personally reject miracles, how much research have you done to ensure that there is, in fact, a reasonable naturalistic explanation forthcoming?
John, I won’t go around with you again.

The other party defined a miracle as an actual event for which no scientific explanation is possible and asserted that there is at least one example of such a miracle. I insist that in order to convince me of the actuality of miracles, the other party bears the full burden of proof and I bear none.

Would it satisfy you if I said that I am a skeptic concerning the supernatural, but that disproving miracles either amounts to proving a negative or gaining enough knowledge to constructively debunk it, and that I therefore reserve an infinitesimal amount of doubt just to avoid offending your epistemological sensibilities?

I don’t make the positive claim that deities or the supernatural do not exist, but for all practical purposes I am apathetic to the existence of either.

Naturalistic explanation? Human error, self-delusion, outright fraud? Can you decisively rule out any of these?
 
john doran:
i think we’ve been down this road before: god is necessary and thus didn’t begin to exist. the universe did begin to exist, and is thus in need of a cause of its existence.
Ok, lets assume, the universe did need a cause.
Why should this cause *necessarily *have to be an intelligent being?
Why not a natural (but outside of our nature==universe) cause?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top