Doug Batchelor: His Catholic Church Attacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter James1234
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by djconklin
Nope, I use the Bible and the Bible only.
According to her interpretation and prophecies otherwise why not join any other sola scriptura denomination.

Again the SDA church does not base it teachings on EGW.

How many Protestant churches baptizise by immersion?

How many Protestant churches teach their people to keep the Sabbath?

How many Protestant churches teach their people the biblical principle of tithing?

How many do all three?
She never started a church.
History states otherwise.

Only if you call lies, history.

If you wnatto read a lie about history try reading “The Real Lincoln” which was recommended to me by a Catholic on this forum.
I’m not the one who has been caught posting lies found on the web.
There only lies once you disprove them.

[Which i have done.
That’s what the critics of the Bible claim when they post their lists of contradictions.[misspellings fixed]
Contradictions on the part of Ellen White you mean. Nope. Two different lists. The Bible critics have long lists of alleged contradicitons in Scripture. These are based on their naive, simplistic, wooden and literalistic reading of the Bible texts. Then there’s the list of alleged contradicions between EGW and the Bible–created the same way.
 
I don’t recall ever saying such a thing. But, that is why the Bible has the OT and the NT.

It’s there, I took it from your post. The fact that the Bible has an Old Testament and a New Testament doesn’t mean there are two covenants or one for that matter. There are several covenants mentioned in the Bible but we are talking about the Everlasting Covenant made with the blood of Jesus Christ. You’ve skirted it well though. Kudos.

Jeremiah 31:33 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.

I have done so repeatedly:

Ezekiel 20:12 Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the LORD that sanctify them.

Exodus 20:8-11 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

**This is the Lord speaking to us as our Creator, not our Redeemer. We hadn’t yet been redeemed. It is true that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are the same, but Christ the Redeemer had yet to complete the will of God the Father and therefore can’t be included in your assumption here. Which is the assumption that you worship Christ the Redeemer in the Sabbath. God never said as much. Christ never said as much. **

Revelation 14:7 Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.

**It doesn’t matter. We can find the Sabbath in the Redeemer, but we cannot find the Redeemer in the Sabbath. It’s that simple. **

Here’s a new text for you:

Ezekiel 20:20 And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.

Who is your Lord and your God? The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The same as your God. Who created you? The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The same as your creator. You correctly stated it in an earlier post today.
Who redeemed you? The fact that there are three Gods in one says there is a need for such. You should think about remembering Him as he asked us to do. The Eucharist is the way to do that.
 
Again the SDA church does not base it teachings on EGW.

**Okay, here’s where I get confused. If the SDA church does not base its teachings on EGW, then WHY is she part of your Fundemental Beliefs AND you look to her as a guide on how to “keep the Sabbath”. It’s on the conference website. You absolutely do. **

How many Protestant churches baptizise by immersion?

How many Protestant churches teach their people to keep the Sabbath?

How many Protestant churches teach their people the biblical principle of tithing?

How many do all three?

Only if you call lies, history.

If you wnatto read a lie about history try reading “The Real Lincoln” which was recommended to me by a Catholic on this forum.

[Which i have done.

Nope. Two different lists. The Bible critics have long lists of alleged contradicitons in Scripture. These are based on their naive, simplistic, wooden and literalistic reading of the Bible texts. Then there’s the list of alleged contradicions between EGW and the Bible–created the same way.
[/quote]
 
Originally Posted by djconklin
I don’t recall ever saying such a thing. But, that is why the Bible has the OT and the NT.
It’s there, I took it from your post.

Which post?
The fact that the Bible has an Old Testament and a New Testament doesn’t mean there are two covenants or one for that matter.
The words “testament” and “covenant” are interchangeable.
You’ve skirted it well though.
I’ve never skirted anything here.
Jeremiah 31:33 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
I have done so repeatedly:
Ezekiel 20:12 Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the LORD that sanctify them.
Exodus 20:8-11 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
Revelation 14:7 Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.
[This is the Lord speaking to us as our Creator, not our Redeemer.
He is both.
We hadn’t yet been redeemed.
Correct.
It is true that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are the same, but Christ the Redeemer had yet to complete the will of God the Father and therefore can’t be included in your assumption here.
I haven’t made any assumption.
Which is the assumption that you worship Christ the Redeemer in the Sabbath. God never said as much. Christ never said as much.
Neither did I.
Here’s a new text for you:
Ezekiel 20:20 And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.
Who is your Lord and your God? The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The same as your God. Who created you? The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The same as your creator. You correctly stated it in an earlier post today.

Who redeemed you? The fact that there are three Gods in one says there is a need for such. You should think about remembering Him as he asked us to do. The Eucharist is the way to do that.Ah! there’s the misconception and why Islam accusses us of worshipping 3 Gods. There is only one God: the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost.

"Now this is the catholic faith:

That we worship one God in trinity and the trinity in unity, neither blending their persons nor dividing their essence. For the person of the Father is a distinct person, the person of the Son is another, and that of the Holy Spirit still another. But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty coeternal."

found at aboutcatholics.com/faith_beliefs/athanasian_creed/

Still haven’t learned how to use the quote command?!?
[/quote]
 
Again the SDA church does not base it teachings on EGW.
Okay, here’s where I get confused. If the SDA church does not base its teachings on EGW, then WHY is she part of your Fundemental Beliefs AND you look to her as a guide on how to “keep the Sabbath”. It’s on the conference website. You absolutely do.

Who told you that Ellen G. White is named on the web site as on our fundamental beliefs on how to keep the Sabbath?

Here’s is what it says (you could have quoted it just as well as I can):

“20. Sabbath:
The beneficent Creator, after the six days of Creation, rested on the seventh day and instituted the Sabbath for all people as a memorial of Creation. The fourth commandment of God’s unchangeable law requires the observance of this seventh-day Sabbath as the day of rest, worship, and ministry in harmony with the teaching and practice of Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a day of delightful communion with God and one another. It is a symbol of our redemption in Christ, a sign of our sanctification, a token of our allegiance, and a foretaste of our eternal future in God’s kingdom. The Sabbath is God’s perpetual sign of His eternal covenant between Him and His people. Joyful observance of this holy time from evening to evening, sunset to sunset, is a celebration of God’s creative and redemptive acts. (Gen. 2:1-3; Ex. 20:8-11; Luke 4:16; Isa. 56:5, 6; 58:13, 14; Matt. 12:1-12; Ex. 31:13-17; Eze. 20:12, 20; Deut. 5:12-15; Heb. 4:1-11; Lev. 23:32; Mark 1:32.)” found at adventist.org/beliefs/fundamental/index.html

See? No Ellen White.
 
**Actually I’ll give you the website, the quote and the reference:

In 1869 Mrs. White wrote:

"I have not changed my course a particle since I adopted the health reform. I have not taken one step back since the light from heaven upon this subject first shone upon my pathway. I broke away from everything at once, from meat and butter, and from three meals. …I left off those things from principle. I took my stand on health reform from principle."4
  1. E.G. White, Testimonies, Vol. 2, pp. 371-372.
Taken from: ellenwhiteexposed.com/contra6.htm**
Ellen G. White Estate
Counsels on Diet and Foods (1938), page 405, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: Flesh Meats (Proteins Continued)
PROGRESSIVE DIETETIC REFORM IN
SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST INSTITUTIONS

[NOTE: IT IS A MATTER OF HISTORICAL RECORD THAT SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN THEIR EARLY DAYS SERVED FLESH MEAT IN A GREATER OR LESSER DEGREE TO PATIENTS AND HELPERS. THE REFORM IN THIS PHASE OF HEALTHFUL LIVING WAS PROGRESSIVE. IN THE OLDER INSTITUTIONS, AFTER A LONG STRUGGLE, FLESH MEAT WAS EVENTUALLY DISCARDED FROM ALL TABLES. IN THE CASE OF THE BATTLE CREEK SANITARIUM THIS STEP WAS TAKEN IN 1898, LARGELY IN RESPONSE TO COUNSEL FROM MRS. WHITE’S PEN APPEARING IN THIS CHAPTER (722). AT THE ST. HELENA SANITARIUM THE CHANGE TOOK PLACE IN 1903. BY THIS TIME EDUCATION IN THE MATTER OF A NONFLESH DIET HAD SPREAD WIDELY, AND FLESH WAS LEFT OUT OF THE DIETARY OF THE GUESTS WITH LESS DIFFICULTY THAN IF IT HAD BEEN EXCLUDED AT AN EARLIER DATE. IT WAS A JOY TO THE MANAGERS OF THE OLDER INSTITUTIONS TO KNOW THAT IN THE NEW PLANTS OPENED AT ABOUT THIS TIME, FLESH FOOD WAS NOT SERVED TO THE PATIENTS.

http://www.egwtext.whiteestate.org/cgi-bin/egw2html?C=12507639&K=141147040110908619

I guess it takes a while for “the truth” to come out, get established, and put into practice.

God bless all!!!
 
Originally Posted by djconklin
Could you give us the quote from EGW that says that? Then I’ll know who is the liar.
By the way, you never answered my question, are you a VEGETARIAN and/or VEGGAN?

Oh really?!? try reading post #840.
 
Again the SDA church does not base it teachings on EGW.

Are you a vegetarian and/or veggan, and who introduced this into SDA teachings?

Only if you call lies, history.

No, I call “herstory” lies.

Nope. Two different lists. The Bible critics have long lists of alleged contradicitons in Scripture. These are based on their naive, simplistic, wooden and literalistic reading of the Bible texts. Then there’s the list of alleged contradicions between EGW and the Bible–created the same way.
Alleged contradictions!!!, have you read these so-called “alleged” contradictions there are more than 50 of them. I posted only a few.

And for someone who allegedly interprets from scripture itself, you are quick to defend EGW, I wonder why?
 
Originally Posted by djconklin
Nice try. I didn’t say anything about the 613; I asked for biblical texts.
Well, I’m sorry but if you want the laws that tell you how to properly keep the Sabbath which was the subject of the question, then you’ll have to either:

1.) Look at the website I gave you.
2.) Look at the Torah.
3.) Ask a Jew.

I’ll stick with the Bible.
 
Neither. I had stomach surgery back in 1985 for ulcers and I have found that I can’t eat fruits and vegetables straight–too much acid–even in lettuce and bananas of all things!
Oh sorry, djconklin, I missed this one. So what do you eat?
 
Originally Posted by djconklin
Again the SDA church does not base it teachings on EGW.
Are you a vegetarian and/or veggan, and who introduced this into SDA teachings?

The first question was answered back in post #840. The second, I’m not sure, but if it isn’t in the Bible we don’t care.
Only if you call lies, history.
No, I call “herstory” lies.

You can call it anything you wnat; but, without proof it is still a lie.
Nope. Two different lists. The Bible critics have long lists of alleged contradicitons in Scripture. These are based on their naive, simplistic, wooden and literalistic reading of the Bible texts. Then there’s the list of alleged contradictions between EGW and the Bible–created the same way.
Alleged contradictions!!!, have you read these so-called “alleged” contradictions there are more than 50 of them. I posted only a few.

The word “alleged” is used in refernce to the list of alleged contradictions that Bible critics post on the web. As for EGW, yes there’s a list of over 53 that have been shot down so far, some of which you posted.
And for someone who allegedly interprets from scripture itself, you are quick to defend EGW, I wonder why?
  1. EGW and the Bible are two different things.
  2. I happen to like defence. I can deal with any and all attacks.
  3. Defence is easier and in this case I have the truth on my side.
  4. Its fun. I love learning new things. BTW, the latest issue of Scientific American (March 2009, pages 46-54) has an excellant article about how learning new things helps retain new brain cells–otherwise they die.
  5. I gain more material for my list of whoppers told about EGW that I’m posting on my web site.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by josie L
Actually I’ll give you the website, the quote and the reference:
In 1869 Mrs. White wrote:
"I have not changed my course a particle since I adopted the health reform. I have not taken one step back since the light from heaven upon this subject first shone upon my pathway. I broke away from everything at once, from meat and butter, and from three meals. …I left off those things from principle. I took my stand on health reform from principle."4
  1. E.G. White, Testimonies, Vol. 2, pp. 371-372.
Ellen G. White Estate
Counsels on Diet and Foods (1938), page 405, paragraph 2
Chapter Title: Flesh Meats (Proteins Continued)
PROGRESSIVE DIETETIC REFORM IN
SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST INSTITUTIONS

[NOTE: IT IS A MATTER OF HISTORICAL RECORD THAT SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST HEALTH INSTITUTIONS IN THEIR EARLY DAYS SERVED FLESH MEAT IN A GREATER OR LESSER DEGREE TO PATIENTS AND HELPERS. THE REFORM IN THIS PHASE OF HEALTHFUL LIVING WAS PROGRESSIVE. IN THE OLDER INSTITUTIONS, AFTER A LONG STRUGGLE, FLESH MEAT WAS EVENTUALLY DISCARDED FROM ALL TABLES. IN THE CASE OF THE BATTLE CREEK SANITARIUM THIS STEP WAS TAKEN IN 1898, LARGELY IN RESPONSE TO COUNSEL FROM MRS. WHITE’S PEN APPEARING IN THIS CHAPTER (722). AT THE ST. HELENA SANITARIUM THE CHANGE TOOK PLACE IN 1903. BY THIS TIME EDUCATION IN THE MATTER OF A NONFLESH DIET HAD SPREAD WIDELY, AND FLESH WAS LEFT OUT OF THE DIETARY OF THE GUESTS WITH LESS DIFFICULTY THAN IF IT HAD BEEN EXCLUDED AT AN EARLIER DATE. IT WAS A JOY TO THE MANAGERS OF THE OLDER INSTITUTIONS TO KNOW THAT IN THE NEW PLANTS OPENED AT ABOUT THIS TIME, FLESH FOOD WAS NOT SERVED TO THE PATIENTS.

http://www.egwtext.whiteestate.org/c...47040110908619

I guess it takes a while for “the truth” to come out, get established, and put into practice.Thank you Patrick for taking the time to tell the whole truth.
 
The first question was answered back in post #840. The second, I’m not sure, but if it isn’t in the Bible we don’t care.

So shouldn’t you find out? EGW seemed to be convinced that eating animal products/meat was bad, according to her “prophecies” anyways.

You can call it anything you wnat; but, without proof it is still a lie.

Not following you here, if not for her “prophecies” the SDA’s would cease to exist.

The word “alleged” is used in refernce to the list of alleged contradictions that Bible critics post on the web. As for EGW, yes there’s a list of over 53 that have been shot down so far, some of which you posted.

I have seen some of the apologetics used by the SDA’s to explain away those contradictions, they have in no way been shot down. Go to the website I have posted to see what I mean.
  1. EGW and the Bible are two different things.
Not according to EGW who seems to accord her prophecies as truly derived from God, and thus equal to what was written in the Bible.
  1. I happen to like defence. I can deal with any and all attacks.
Me too, especially if it involves an anti-catholic prophet and/or institution.
  1. Defence is easier and in this case I have the truth on my side.
Ditto.
  1. Its fun.
Yes, very challenging.
  1. I gain more material for my list of whoppers told about EGW that I’m posting on my web site.
You have not dealt with the “lies” as well as you think have.
 
Ah! there’s the misconception and why Islam accusses us of worshipping 3 Gods. There is only one God: the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost.

"Now this is the catholic faith:

That we worship one God in trinity and the trinity in unity, neither blending their persons nor dividing their essence. For the person of the Father is a distinct person, the person of the Son is another, and that of the Holy Spirit still another. But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one, their glory equal, their majesty
coeternal."

Which is exactly what I said. You are grasping.

found at aboutcatholics.com/faith_beliefs/athanasian_creed/

Still haven’t learned how to use the quote command?!?
Nope.
 
In this case yes.

And yet when i ask where he said this I get no specific link, why?

That’s one of teh claims people have made. I’m showing that informed people have corrected it. Sorry for confusing you with too many facts.

Except I don’t twist the truth. have you found the evidence yet that I twisted Scripture on Col. 2:16-17 as you claimed, or do you wish to eat that lie?
Below is your link to Doug Bachelors so-called seminars…Again
What claims??? corrected what??
You are not confusing me at all…You’re just not making any sense. Do they teach the “bait and switch” technique you use so well to all the SDA converts?

amazingfacts.org/
 
You can call it anything you want; but, without proof it is still a lie.
Not following you here, if not for her “prophecies” the SDA’s would cease to exist.

Alright! Another one for my list!
The word “alleged” is used in reference to the list of alleged contradictions that Bible critics post on the web. As for EGW, yes there’s a list of over 53 that have been shot down so far, some of which you posted.
I have seen some of the apologetics used by the SDA’s to explain away those contradictions, they have in no way been shot down. Go to the website I have posted to see what I mean.

I have seen it–this site answers their claims: whiteestate.org/issues/contradictions.html
  1. EGW and the Bible are two different things.
Not according to EGW who seems to accord her prophecies as truly derived from God, and thus equal to what was written in the Bible.

Neither SDA’s, nor EGW, believe that her writings are equal to what was written in the Bible–where’d you get that lie from?
  1. I happen to like defence. I can deal with any and all attacks.
Me too, especially if it involves an anti-catholic prophet and/or institution.

If the SDA church was so “anti-catholic” then why would pastors tell the congragants that there will be more Catholics in heaven than SDA’s? That is one of the chief whoppers Catholics have ben told and tell about us.
  1. Defence is easier and in this case I have the truth on my side.
Ditto.

That’s a hoot–you used a web site that lied to you.
  1. I gain more material for my list of whoppers told about EGW that I’m posting on my web site.
You have not dealt with the “lies” as well as you think have.

Not according to outsiders who are looking in.​

I take it that you don’t know how to use the quote command?
 
Bravo:thumbsup:
You are right about that one finally,E.White is not mother of Jesus.
Hi Sabbath Keeper,

Well yes, there is a big distinction to be sure. God did not choose Ellen White to be His Mother when He became a man at the Incarnation.

But why give flowers to a dead woman who believed that she wouldn’t even know about it?

God bless all!!!
 
Who told you that Ellen G. White is named on the web site as on our fundamental beliefs on how to keep the Sabbath?

Here’s is what it says (you could have quoted it just as well as I can):

“20. Sabbath:
The beneficent Creator, after the six days of Creation, rested on the seventh day and instituted the Sabbath for all people as a memorial of Creation. The fourth commandment of God’s unchangeable law requires the observance of this seventh-day Sabbath as the day of rest, worship, and ministry in harmony with the teaching and practice of Jesus, the Lord of the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a day of delightful communion with God and one another. It is a symbol of our redemption in Christ, a sign of our sanctification, a token of our allegiance, and a foretaste of our eternal future in God’s kingdom. The Sabbath is God’s perpetual sign of His eternal covenant between Him and His people. Joyful observance of this holy time from evening to evening, sunset to sunset, is a celebration of God’s creative and redemptive acts. (Gen. 2:1-3; Ex. 20:8-11; Luke 4:16; Isa. 56:5, 6; 58:13, 14; Matt. 12:1-12; Ex. 31:13-17; Eze. 20:12, 20; Deut. 5:12-15; Heb. 4:1-11; Lev. 23:32; Mark 1:32.)” found at adventist.org/beliefs/fundamental/index.html

See? No Ellen White.
Right here sweetie:
adventist.org/beliefs/other_documents/other_doc6.html

I’ve already told you where I get my EGW drivel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top