Dr. Charles Stanley exclaimed: Purgatory is false!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nicea325
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Praise God for your faithfulness to His word. Here’s more from the word of God;

Romans 8
There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus,[a] who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. 2*For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death
Here a few verses for you:
Mt 5:26 you will not be released until paid last penny.
Mt 12: 32 sin again Holy Spirit unforgiven in this age or the next ( what will be the next as you don’t have anything to be forgiven in heaven)
1 Co 3 :15 suffer loss, but saved as through fire
1 Pe 3: 18-20 and 4 :6 Jesus preached to the spirit in prison ( where is this prison)
 
My issue with puragatory:

Jesus spoke nearly endlessly about Heaven and Hell, using very clear and precise language that can not be misunderstood and thus almost every single christian today (whether they be catholic. protestant of orthodox) understands the concept of an eternal Heaven and Hell. He is nauseatingly clear about their existence and nature.

Now, the question then becomes: Why would he not be just as clear about purgatory? Why would he largely (yes, I know there are a couple of sentences that vaguely allude to something like purgatory if you read them with the intent of seeing it) ignore such a significant aspect of the afterlife? Why would Paul and Peter largely do the same? Why is the ONLY passage that can unbiasedly be read as a possible suggestion of purgatory in an old testement book that half of christianity rejects anyway?

It just doesnt make sense. Jesus was abundantly clear on the afterlife, why would he not be clear about purgatory? Moreover, why did the first and second century church fathers fail to clearly define such a place? I mean, surely if Jesus had just failed to mention it publically someone would have at least gotten the memo?
Where does it say that everything Jesus said or taught the Apostles is in the Bible?

Is the Bible all there is to know about what Jesus taught and did?
 
My issue with puragatory:

Jesus spoke nearly endlessly about Heaven and Hell, using very clear and precise language that can not be misunderstood and thus almost every single christian today (whether they be catholic. protestant of orthodox) understands the concept of an eternal Heaven and Hell. He is nauseatingly clear about their existence and nature.

It just doesnt make sense. Jesus was abundantly clear on the afterlife, why would he not be clear about purgatory? Moreover, why did the first and second century church fathers fail to clearly define such a place? I mean, surely if Jesus had just failed to mention it publically someone would have at least gotten the memo?
If you really want to…here is an exhaustive explanation…from the OT to the NT of purgatory…catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0091.html
 
If you really want to…here is an exhaustive explanation…from the OT to the NT of purgatory…catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0091.html
I’ve read a ton of catholic commentary on the subject, including Scott Hahn. Many offer up decent reasoning but, in the read, nobody can provide conclusive biblical proof of purgatory because it isnt there. Meanwhile I can PROVE to someone who believes the bible that Heaven and Hell exist, that they are eternal and

My question still stands: Why would Jesus fail to be clear about purgatory and, at BEST, be completely ambiguous and at worst fail to mention it entirely? Jesus beat his message INTO THE GROUND. Heaven, Hell, God, sin, love, etc. are all so clear and evident in his teaching. It makes no sense why he wouldnt include even one statement clearing up purgatory. “By the way guys, if you die in a state of grace but still have sin on your soul you will spend x amount of time in a place of temporary punishment called whatever before going to heaven.” That’s all it would take, but there is nothing like it.

A big problem is that many, including many catholic apologists, equate Sheol to purgatory. That is simply false. Sheol was not a place of temporal agony, it was simply a chamber of the dead who couldnt enter heaven because Jesus had not yet provided the sacrifice for them.
 
Praying for the dead =/ Purgatory. That is a cop out. Plenty of non-catholics “pray” for their relatives and friends when they die. It’s a comfort mechanism if nothing else.

How do you know what is in the heart of Catholics when they do this? Do you have access to each one’s heart and intention?
Asking God to take care of your loved ones doesnt mean you believe in purgatory.
 
I’ve read a ton of catholic commentary on the subject, including Scott Hahn. Many offer up decent reasoning but, in the read, nobody can provide conclusive biblical proof of purgatory because it isnt there. Meanwhile I can PROVE to someone who believes the bible that Heaven and Hell exist, that they are eternal and

Have you come across the article by Hahn in the link? If not, I suggest a second look.
My question still stands: Why would Jesus fail to be clear about purgatory and, at BEST, be completely ambiguous and at worst fail to mention it entirely?
 
Praying for the dead =/ Purgatory. That is a cop out. Plenty of non-catholics “pray” for their relatives and friends when they die. It’s a comfort mechanism if nothing else. Asking God to take care of your loved ones doesnt mean you believe in purgatory. Furthermore jewish beliefs on a cleansing process vary and yet they still prayed for the dead, meaning many prayed for the dead in spite of a lack of belief in any form of righteous punishment. Even if it did prove purgatory, it still doesnt explain why Jesus and the early christians failed to clearly define purgatory as they did so many other things.

And most historians believe the apostles creed was written centuries after christ with the absolute earliest plausible date being close to 200 AD. There is also virtually no evidence of who wrote it or what language it was originally written in. All we know for sure is that it was NOT written by the original apostles. Additionally, you appear to be equating the old testement concept of the underworld to purgatory which would be inaccurate. Sheol is not purgatory.
Oh, what is it, a third place? We are taught that purgatory is a place where we are temporarily deprived of the Beatific Vision, not that we don’t have sanctifying grace and God living in us, for if we die without sanctifying grace, we go to hell. It seems to me that the people in sheol, like the people in Purgatory, are both temporarily deprived of the Beatific Vision, that is, heaven. It’s close enough for me to call both Purgatory, coupled with the Jewish belief that there is a process of purification after death. I did not make that up. Plus, my common sense tells me the same thing. I do not believe that I have achieved such great perfection thus far in life that I can waltz right into the throne room of God fully confident of my purity of heart in the very real Presence of the God of all the universe. Unless of course he gives me a special pass, one that I can’t see how I merit on my own, and I’m not talking about being covered by the blood of Jesus. I’m covered now, but I still suffer. Why?

I won’t try to convince you; you already have all the evidence but it hasn’t convinced you. You seem to think that the fact that the Apostles’ Creed was formalized 200 years later that it may be be undependable. On the contrary, my small knowledge of how things were done in the earliest Church leads me to believe that these truths were taught throughout Christendom and without actually doing the research, I am sure you will find it in writings of the early Church fathers. When truths are finally formalized in the Church they have already long been believed by the faithful, handed down from generation to generation, and recored in various places…

I see by your religion that you choose Jesus, the Person, rather than the Church that he founded. I’m sure you have your reasons for believing He never intended there to be a Church, but like the question of Purgatory, the evidence is there but I can’t make you believe it. I assume you’re not Catholic, otherwise you would be accepting of the Church’s teaching drawn both from Scripture and tradition, which includes the writings of the early Church fathers and the beliefs and practices of Christians from the earliest times. I don’t know how you are going to follow Jesus apart from the Church, because only the Church has the resources you need to find out what Jesus taught and what His earliest disciples taught in His Name. I can’t convince you, but I know if you truly follow Jesus, you’ll end up in His Church. Now, I made a lot of assumptions, but I didn’t have much to go on, so if you’re Catholic, I’m sorry I misjudged, but Catholics don’t normally express their religion as Jesus; that’s who they follow, but they do so through His Church. It just wouldn’t make any sense for Him to start a Church and not give it the protection it needs to remain free from error. Good luck to you if you hope to find the whole truth from your private interpretation of the Scriptures; I’m afraid that is fraught with peril.

Oh, one more thing. Consider this-- the Church has remained unchanged in its teachings for more than 20 centuries. That should count for something. Either it is protected by the Holy Spirit from error or it has been run by the most stubborn of men imaginable for all these two thousand years, a great feat if you can pull it off. I assume this is not the only difference you have with what Catholics believe. Maybe you could start a thread and air them out. Just a suggestion. Peace. 🙂
 
I’ve read a ton of catholic commentary on the subject, including Scott Hahn. Many offer up decent reasoning but, in the read, nobody can provide conclusive biblical proof of purgatory because it isnt there. Meanwhile I can PROVE to someone who believes the bible that Heaven and Hell exist, that they are eternal and

My question still stands: Why would Jesus fail to be clear about purgatory and, at BEST, be completely ambiguous and at worst fail to mention it entirely? Jesus beat his message INTO THE GROUND. Heaven, Hell, God, sin, love, etc. are all so clear and evident in his teaching. It makes no sense why he wouldnt include even one statement clearing up purgatory. “By the way guys, if you die in a state of grace but still have sin on your soul you will spend x amount of time in a place of temporary punishment called whatever before going to heaven.” That’s all it would take, but there is nothing like it.

A big problem is that many, including many catholic apologists, equate Sheol to purgatory. That is simply false. Sheol was not a place of temporal agony, it was simply a chamber of the dead who couldnt enter heaven because Jesus had not yet provided the sacrifice for them.
Even more so, it makes no sense that the earliest Christians would have such a doctrine that they eventually felt they must formalize in the Creed if it wasn’t the teaching of Christ and His early disciples.

The souls in sheol all had the stain of original sin, if not also the temporal punishment due to their sins during their lifetime. Maybe, the temporal punishment due to sin was paid in full at some point, but they still were deprived of the Presence of God, until Jesus released them. Listen to Pablope, he apparently has studied this and does have sound answers and cites. And just because you can’t prove something from the Bible to your satisfaction, does not make it untrue. The Bible is not the last word on everything, To ignore the teachings of Jesus Himself passed on through the early leaders of the Church would be foolhardy IMHO. What did the Apostle say? Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.John 21:25

There is a major fallacy in the “Bible alone” philosophy. It has been the cause of multitudes of doctrinal differences. Everyone who reads it “alone” seems to come up with still another new doctrine or twist. It just makes so much sense that Christ provided a Church to conserve and preach what He taught, and provided that it be free from error in matters of faith and morals. So far I cannot find one doctrine of the Catholic Church that I would like to change. It has the whole truth.
 
…“By the way guys, if you die in a state of grace but still have sin on your soul you will spend x amount of time in a place of temporary punishment called whatever before going to heaven.” That’s all it would take, but there is nothing like it…
Just think of all the sins of omission! Do we spend all of our time wisely? Do we give sufficiently of our resources to help the downtrodden? Do we spend all our time serving God? Do we really take up our cross and follow Him? There is a whole lot we will still have to answer for when we die, despite the fact that we die in the state of grace. In this respect, we should all tremble at the prospect of meeting Jesus the Judge when we shuffle off this mortal coil. I cannot name the number of things I did not do, the number of opportunities I did not take advantage of. Like Paul, we should work out our salvation is fear and trembling.
 
Guys, no offense, but the cows can program the DVD player by now. They are so hardened of heart that will NEVER believe. Leave them be. They will find out some day. Everything to them is BIBLE, BIBLE, BIBLE.

The BIBLE that the Catholic Church gave to the world except they rejected that and had a protestant king write another one to suit their version of Christianity. Rampant hardness of heart since 1517. Leave them to the Lord.
 
Guys, no offense, but the cows can program the DVD player by now. They are so hardened of heart that will NEVER believe. Leave them be. They will find out some day. Everything to them is BIBLE, BIBLE, BIBLE.

The BIBLE that the Catholic Church gave to the world except they rejected that and had a protestant king write another one to suit their version of Christianity. Rampant hardness of heart since 1517. Leave them to the Lord.
In much the same way that I still do not have a gift from the Lord to discern those predestined for perdition, I still do not have the gift of discernment as to whose heart will never turn, will never soften, will never step back just once enough for Jesus’ love to enter that little area of their heart, and begin a whole new revolution in their lives. God has told us that His Word will not return void. Even when it seems hopeless, we should not give up hope for our separated brothers and sisters. OTOH, I see what you are saying as a practical matter. We need to spend our time where it can bear the most fruit. Still, that is not always ours to decide. Cast you nets on the other side of the boat, the Master said. And when they did it was filled to overflowing, even though they had been out all night and caught nothing. But I do take your advice as helpful guidance and intended to comfort when we feel like we are beating our heads against a brick wall. The thing is, our attempts at helping others helps ourselves. They help us to grow stronger in our own faith and to search out and discover the richness of our own faith. This Forum is a wonderful place to delve deeper and deeper into the storehouse of wisdom and knowledge, which is Holy Mother Church. And as we receive these gifts of Hers, we must give them away. Lastly, I would not say hardness of heart so much as blindness of mind. These brothers and sisters love the Lord. They are members of the same family as you and I. I do know the admonition, “Cast not your pearls before swine,” but I reject it in dealing inside the family, for what is a separated brother and sister but a family member. Thank you for your well intentioned advice. I do hope you are wrong. Also, I hope the Jews, one of which is my dear wife, will also some day rejoice in the risen Lord. It’s a veil over their eyes, and the Lord has promised to lift it. He will do so, but I am not thereby absolved from teaching/discoursing with them to the extent they are willing to entertain such matters. Peace.
 
below is a snippet from a short article on Purgatory from Catholic.com…what great resources we have right at the click of a mouse!!

The Argument for Purgatory

I would like to thank Jimmy Akin for introducing me to the logical argument for purgatory; it can be formulated as follows:

Premise 1: There will be neither sin nor attachment to sin in Heaven.

Premise 2: We (at least most of us) are still sinning and are attached to sin at the end of this life.

Conclusion: Therefore there must be a period between death and heavenly glory in which the saved are cleansed of sin and their attachment to sin.

Because this is a deductive argument, if one wants to dispute the conclusion, he must take issue with one of the premises, since the conclusion follows from them necessarily.

So which is it?
It’s great to know that Christian doctrine is just a logical conclusion.
 
In much the same way that I still do not have a gift from the Lord to discern those predestined for perdition, I still do not have the gift of discernment as to whose heart will never turn, will never soften, will never step back just once enough for Jesus’ love to enter that little area of their heart, and begin a whole new revolution in their lives. God has told us that His Word will not return void. Even when it seems hopeless, we should not give up hope for our separated brothers and sisters. OTOH, I see what you are saying as a practical matter. We need to spend our time where it can bear the most fruit. Still, that is not always ours to decide. Cast you nets on the other side of the boat, the Master said. And when they did it was filled to overflowing, even though they had been out all night and caught nothing. But I do take your advice as helpful guidance and intended to comfort when we feel like we are beating our heads against a brick wall. The thing is, our attempts at helping others helps ourselves. They help us to grow stronger in our own faith and to search out and discover the richness of our own faith. This Forum is a wonderful place to delve deeper and deeper into the storehouse of wisdom and knowledge, which is Holy Mother Church. And as we receive these gifts of Hers, we must give them away. Lastly, I would not say hardness of heart so much as blindness of mind. These brothers and sisters love the Lord. They are members of the same family as you and I. I do know the admonition, “Cast not your pearls before swine,” but I reject it in dealing inside the family, **for what is a separated brother and sister but a family member. ** Thank you for your well intentioned advice. I do hope you are wrong. Also, I hope the Jews, one of which is my dear wife, will also some day rejoice in the risen Lord. It’s a veil over their eyes, and the Lord has promised to lift it. He will do so, but I am not thereby absolved from teaching/discoursing with them to the extent they are willing to entertain such matters. Peace.
:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
In much the same way that I still do not have a gift from the Lord to discern those predestined for perdition, I still do not have the gift of discernment as to whose heart will never turn, will never soften, will never step back just once enough for Jesus’ love to enter that little area of their heart, and begin a whole new revolution in their lives. God has told us that His Word will not return void. Even when it seems hopeless, we should not give up hope for our separated brothers and sisters. OTOH, I see what you are saying as a practical matter. We need to spend our time where it can bear the most fruit. Still, that is not always ours to decide. Cast you nets on the other side of the boat, the Master said. And when they did it was filled to overflowing, even though they had been out all night and caught nothing. But I do take your advice as helpful guidance and intended to comfort when we feel like we are beating our heads against a brick wall. The thing is, our attempts at helping others helps ourselves. They help us to grow stronger in our own faith and to search out and discover the richness of our own faith. This Forum is a wonderful place to delve deeper and deeper into the storehouse of wisdom and knowledge, which is Holy Mother Church. And as we receive these gifts of Hers, we must give them away. Lastly, I would not say hardness of heart so much as blindness of mind. These brothers and sisters love the Lord. They are members of the same family as you and I. I do know the admonition, “Cast not your pearls before swine,” but I reject it in dealing inside the family, for what is a separated brother and sister but a family member. Thank you for your well intentioned advice. I do hope you are wrong. Also, I hope the Jews, one of which is my dear wife, will also some day rejoice in the risen Lord. It’s a veil over their eyes, and the Lord has promised to lift it. He will do so, but I am not thereby absolved from teaching/discoursing with them to the extent they are willing to entertain such matters. Peace.
I see your point. The more they argue, the more I find why I am Catholic and why I will never leave again. On a personal level, and given my locale, I guess I am just burned out by the attitudes of protestant fundamentalists.
 
I see your point. The more they argue, the more I find why I am Catholic and why I will never leave again. On a personal level, and given my locale, I guess I am just burned out by the attitudes of protestant fundamentalists.
My job took me to Kentucky one year. I attended a Catholic church in one town, but didn’t know a soul there. It was Catholic friendly, if you know what I mean, polite, and well mannered, but I never got to know anyone. But is another nearby town, I found a Pentecostal church sprung from a Baptist church. They were fundamentalist in there beliefs, but being that I had experience with the Catholic charismatic movement, I thought I’d give it a try. They turned out to be the most loving people I had ever met. After some time of visiting their church after Mass, I got to know the people really well. The Pastor invited me for dinner at least weekly and we had all kinds of outings and get-togethers. I really grew fond of all those loving Christian people. As time wore on, some of them became bolder in talking to me about Catholicism. Because I came to know them on the basis of friendship and our mutual love for the Lord, they had been hesitant to bring up these subject, but once they loved and trusted me, they did. There were questions about worshiping Mary, transubstantiation, and of course, the Catholic Church being the harlot of Babylon. I don’t know whether my answers persuaded anyone, but I’m sure it gave them food for thought. By and large, we focused on the 90% we had in common, especially our love for the Lord. I haven’t kept up with them over the years, but I do know that at one point two of them whose home I stayed at on one trip,became missionaries, taking there children with them. That church was so full of God’s love. I guess the lesson I learned is that it’s better to meet fundamentalists on a friendship basis than to encounter them in terms of doctrinal debate. We do have more in common than we have differences, and I did learn a lot from them, as I am sure they learned a lot from me. I was even asked to become their assistant pastor, but of course, I had to decline, being that I was a Catholic. I’m sure that was difficult for them to understand, but they accepted my decision.
 
So non-catholics say its not in the Bible. But it doesnt say it doesnt exsist. Its a hard subject to debate but what about peoples visions of angels showing them purgatory? Are they liars? Crazy? Or are they telling the truth? In my own expierence, the catholic church has far more reports of miracles and visions than any other religion.
 
So non-catholics say its not in the Bible. But it doesnt say it doesnt exsist. Its a hard subject to debate but what about peoples visions of angels showing them purgatory? Are they liars? Crazy? Or are they telling the truth? In my own expierence, the catholic church has far more reports of miracles and visions than any other religion.
Someone aptly pointed out that the forbears of today’s Protestants believed there was a purgatory for 1,500 years, then stopped believing it after leaving the Catholic Church. What changed? They left behind tradition in preference for a “Bible alone” position for the first time in those 1,500 years. So, they took the Bible, which the Catholic Church had previously defined, dropped a few books on their own authority, and discarded 1,500 years, now 2,000 years, of tradition, the writings of saintly Church leaders and doctors, and practices of Holy Mother Church. I suppose it was necessary to abandon tradition, because they could not take with them the succession of the Chair of St. Peter, nor claim the infallibility of their new churches’ teachings. Better to jettison it all, save the Bible, I guess was the sentiment. I wonder how many variations of Christian doctrine now exist in the world due to Protestantism? A few more if you add the schism churches.
 
Someone aptly pointed out that the forbears of today’s Protestants believed there was a purgatory for 1,500 years, then stopped believing it after leaving the Catholic Church. What changed? They left behind tradition in preference for a “Bible alone” position for the first time in those 1,500 years. So, they took the Bible, which the Catholic Church had previously defined, dropped a few books on their own authority, and discarded 1,500 years, now 2,000 years, of tradition, the writings of saintly Church leaders and doctors, and practices of Holy Mother Church. I suppose it was necessary to abandon tradition, because they could not take with them the succession of the Chair of St. Peter, nor claim the infallibility of their new churches’ teachings. Better to jettison it all, save the Bible, I guess was the sentiment. I wonder how many variations of Christian doctrine now exist in the world due to Protestantism? A few more if you add the schism churches.
Thanks for your comment. Personally, I believe in purgatory. We cannot stand in Gods presence with sin. I just dont understand non-catholics view of not having purgatory.
 
Thanks for your comment. Personally, I believe in purgatory. We cannot stand in Gods presence with sin. I just dont understand non-catholics view of not having purgatory.
If you remember at the time of Martin Luther, there were abuses concerning indulgences. For one thing, they were being sold for money, and for another, some churchmen promised the gullible faithful false benefits from the indulgences, such as perpetual happiness in this life and assurance of salvation in the next. Indulgences as we know them today, and as Church teaching has always accorded them, are cancellations of temporal punishment still due for sins that have already been forgiven. Certain prayers and blessings carry with them indulgences, and plenary indulgences require confession and communion, like the Pope’s recent Bible Papal blessing. Luther was upset with the profiteering going on around the sale of indulgences, and one of his thoughts on the matter was that the Pope had no authority to grant indulgences and that justification was by faith alone. This for all intents and purposes, the way I understand it, wiped out the need for a purgatory in his eyes; i.e., if you’re justified by faith alone, there’s no need for anything further. Luther made the Bible primary, and said that he would only obey the Pope if it agreed with the Bible. I think this may be the origin of denying the existence of purgatory in the Protestant churches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top