DRE Says No Bible Memorization

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoodTony
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I never said Scripture shouldn’t be used to pass on the faith. I said the DRE was wise not to have memorization.
I disagree. I think the DRE has an unhealthy fear of scriptures and when subjecting the class to a prohibitor with regard to scripture its like teaching "something is wrong with scripture.
No, I’m not. “Quoting” is saying memorized words.
Qutoing verbatum is saying memorized words. You can quote a story non-verbatum and still be quoting it.
I don’t think so
What?!? Oh My? And to what purpose where scripture written then? The scriptures say of themselves?
2 Tim 3:15 - to make you wise for salvation; 2 Tim 3:16 - All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness
That is catachesis. What did the 3rd council of carthage say?
because we have received from our fathers that those books must be read in the Church
or the council of Trent
what testimonies and authorities it will mainly use in confirming dogmas, and in restoring morals in the Church.”
The Church used Scripture as part of that, themselves. WE, the faithful, never had any Scripture to use or memorize or the ability to read it for most of our history
That is simply untrue. Certainly, the first century christians relied on Apostolic Witness alone. Yet as the Apostles wrote down their letters and notes to the different churches the Church used those word to continue to instruct them when the Apostles were gone as well as the Traditions they left behind. And here is another item you misunderstand. One of the Purposes of Liturgy as taken from the Jews is for community memorization of Scripture. So your summation is faulty here. For most of church history scriptures were memorized by people. Do you know how the rosary came to be? Long before the Dominicans had a beatific vision monks would have knots tied to rope and they would count the knots reciting a psalm for each knot. Interesting for a people who didn’t memorize scripture. And people throughout church history have been encouraged to remember scripture.
This is what Protestants do, isn’t it?
not really because they don’t do it in the context of the church magisterium
Quote a whole lot of memorized passages of Scripture that they say mean a certain thing. Of course, they are wrong. And that becomes very dangerous and it breeds more and more people perfectly quoting misinterpreted Scripture. Which I believe is what this DRE wants to avoid.
Then the DRE is being foolish. There is no issue between scripture and the magestium as long as scripture are taught in that context. What the DRE is doing is putting their catachumins in problems for the future by misapplying what the Catholic Church actually teaches. Because these catachumins will go forth explaining the Catholic Church discourages the study of scripture and as always that gets the Church into trouble and causes a false perception that the Catholic church is about burning bibles.
Because you remember every single thing you memorized in school years later? Or you think kids will from Confirmation? Do you do this often in your own life? Quote Scripture passages at nonCatholics?
As a matter of fact I do. I’ve memorized tons of scripture and when debating protestant I put up a good fight for the Church force the protestants to review passages in a Catholic Context. Unfortunately, most protestant I do this with are shocked that a Catholic can go head to head with them regarding scriptures. So their opinion of the Catholic faith garnered since the reformation has been confirmed in their minds ie “Catholics hate the bible and are afraid of scriptures” Molarky! Its DRE’s like this that cause the problem.
I talk about Scripture all the time.
I hear people talk about God all the time and it doesn’t mean they actually have faith or even what they are talking about.
I’ve almost never quoted it. When folks say, “The Bible doesn’t say that!” and then I look it up and we find it together and read what it says and it does say that, it seems pretty effective to me in transmitting the Faith.
That’s fine for people who don’t know the bible but I personally would be ashamed if I didn’t know whether something was in the bible or not.
Then I’m not preaching at anyone. I’m sharing my Faith.
Thats an oxymoron. It’s like saying I don’t preach against homosexuality I just believe and say its wrong. or are you one of those people who don’t draw the line. ie “I don’t criticize homosexuals and their agenda I support them to make them feel at home in the Church?” Thats how these things get corrupted. Next, you’ll be supporting gay clergy? What does the church teach? And stand by that!!!
I believe you have conflated my complete support of not memorizing passages of Scripture with not studying Scripture and understanding Faith. You think we should; I think we shouldn’t. We differ. So be it.
I haven’t I think. The Roman Empire didn’t fall in a day. However, little chunks of it got taken away and in the end it fell. That is what’s happening to the faith. We have “Catholic” Women being given “Holy Orders” on a cruize ship by a disobedient Bishop, We have the majority of members who don’t hold to the Church’s teaching of contraception and abortion, We have Bishops supporting homosexuality, We have priest spouting heresies! All of these things didn’t happen over night but one discipline at at time. And that is how the Church is being attacked every day in the trenches. Too many Catholics hide from the trenches in favor of societies relavatism.
 
2 Timothy 3:16-17 - “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”

It is our duty as a child of God to read, study and remember what is said in the Scriptures. Memorizing verses and/or using them to evangelize is wonderful as long as the verses are not taken out of context of the passage. This is how we feed ourselves, through His word! This is what keeps us grounded and in His Glory. Why not memorize what is said?
 
If you read scripture daily, as we are encouraged to do, memorization is inevitable.
 
If you read scripture daily, as we are encouraged to do, memorization is inevitable.
No, really it isn’t. For some people, memorization comes easily, but for some of us, it doesn’t. I’ve prayed the Liturgy of the Hours twice a day for nearly four years now, and have VERY little of it memorized. My brain just doesn’t work that way. I’m great with the overall idea and basic themes and stories and stuff, but memorizing word for word just doesn’t happen.

So am all for reading the Bible and studying what it means and such, but I still don’t understand equating that with memorization.
 
2 Timothy 3:16-17 - “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”

It is our duty as a child of God to read, study and remember what is said in the Scriptures. Memorizing verses and/or using them to evangelize is wonderful as long as the verses are not taken out of context of the passage. This is how we feed ourselves, through His word! This is what keeps us grounded and in His Glory. Why not memorize what is said?
Amen! 🙂
 
No, really it isn’t. For some people, memorization comes easily, but for some of us, it doesn’t. I’ve prayed the Liturgy of the Hours twice a day for nearly four years now, and have VERY little of it memorized. My brain just doesn’t work that way. I’m great with the overall idea and basic themes and stories and stuff, but memorizing word for word just doesn’t happen.

So am all for reading the Bible and studying what it means and such, but I still don’t understand equating that with memorization.
The liturgy of the Hours is a lot of material to remember. No one could do it unless they were savants.

But staying in the word is great! I am certain there are verses that you like which you’ve memorized isn’t there?
 
The liturgy of the Hours is a lot of material to remember. No one could do it unless they were savants.

But staying in the word is great! I am certain there are verses that you like which you’ve memorized isn’t there?
Sure there is a lot, but I’m praying the same thing (basically) every 4 weeks. And really the only part I have memorized are the three prayers you pray every day. I’ve tried memorizing things over they years and my brain just doesn’t work that way. 🤷
 
Sure there is a lot, but I’m praying the same thing (basically) every 4 weeks. And really the only part I have memorized are the three prayers you pray every day. I’ve tried memorizing things over they years and my brain just doesn’t work that way. 🤷
Well, it seems to me you’ve memorized lots of scriptures you like. And at least 3 prayers from the Liturgy of the Hours. Not bad at all for some one not built that way!
 
It does’t make sense. They might as well discourage reading the bible altogether because they might misinterpret that also. Heck, why not discourage them from reading the catechism too. They might misinterpret that also. They should also discourage reading scripture at the Mass too because people might misinterpret it.

In my opinion, If you don’t want people to misinterpret the bible, then you teach them how to properly interpet it. You don’t deny them access to it. Because they will resent you and read it any way on their own. Instead, you educate them on scripture. Answer their questions the best you can.

The bible is God’s Word and a great reverence for it should be instilled. Memorizing scripture should be encouraged. In fact, that is what Jesus would have done in his day. Everyone didnt have their own books like us. They had to memorize it if they wanted to recall it later. Memorization helps you to remember it and thus learn it better.
I believe this also, the Bible’s text is to be taught in the proper way and clarification and answers to questions people have about verse and scripture are all in being alright in my opinion. How else are we supposed to understand God’s plan and to understand what to do and how to do it. Preventing people from reading the Bible is to keep them ignorant of understanding their faith and to deny them the full presence of being near God’s Word.
 
Nobody ever answered this question–speculate–did Jesus memorize scripture when He was a boy?

If He did shouldn’t we imitate Jesus and also memorize scripture?

Also how would it be possible that Jesus would astound the doctors of the scriptures in the temple when He was 12 with his knowledge of the scriptures if He didn’t memorize scripture?

I don’t even know why this thread has gone on this long. anyone who doesn’t believe that we as Catholics should memorize scripture is just plain wrong–I guarantee you that if someone asked Pope Benedict XVI if it was a good idea to memorize scripture he would say yes!
 
Nobody ever answered this question–speculate–did Jesus memorize scripture when He was a boy?

If He did shouldn’t we imitate Jesus and also memorize scripture?

Also how would it be possible that Jesus would astound the doctors of the scriptures in the temple when He was 12 with his knowledge of the scriptures if He didn’t memorize scripture?

I don’t even know why this thread has gone on this long. anyone who doesn’t believe that we as Catholics should memorize scripture is just plain wrong–I guarantee you that if someone asked Pope Benedict XVI if it was a good idea to memorize scripture he would say yes!
Being a Jewish boy in the 2nd Temple period he (Jesus) was required to memorize Torah and based on his discussions with the pharisees he also memorized the books of prophets and writings. For instance look at mark 7
6 He answered and said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written:
‘This people honors Me with their lips,
But their heart is far from Me.
7 And in vain they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’
8 For laying
 
The DRE at a church in my area states:
“We do not encourage anyone to memorize bible verses because the person may misinterpret the bible verses.”
What do the forum members think about that comment?
Well, I would have to say that if we are to avoid misinterpreting a bible verse, then when need to have someone, namely a priest with A LOT of experience, to help us interpret it. A good example is the homily after the Gospel is read. The priest will give an explanation of what the verses truly mean in a way we can interpret it and understand it. Also, a very good friend of the family, who happens to be a priest, told us to read a chapter 3 times to be able to use all our senses. What sense you may ask? At this time I don’t recall but I will get back to that. Not to mention another good way is reading up on apologetic materias which coverall the common misinterpretations associated with bible verses.
 
I would have to hear exactly what she said, and in what context.

So, I ask OP, in what context did the DRE make her comment. Did she imply it is somehow forbidden for Catholics to memorize bible verses? Or was she responding perhaps to a parent who asked why the children are not required to do so.
:clapping: exactly! Sooooo… GoodTony, what was the context?

(you know, it would be particularly ironic if the conversation that this quote was pulled from was a discussion of the dangers of taking Scripture verses out of context…)
 
Memorization of the shorter psalms should be encouraged. It helps if the translator have some sense of meter. That is often not the case with the NAB. I do hope that eventually, after its present caretakers have left the scene, we will get a new translaton, although we could just use what the Canadians do. Does anyone use the NAB except the American church?
 
Jesus quoted the Psalms. I think the Psalms are the biggest argument for memorizing Scripture. Quoting Psalm 91 has really been a big source of strength during all the earthquakes we had and continue to have. Who can find fault with memorizing the Psalms?
 
Nobody ever answered this question–speculate–did Jesus memorize scripture when He was a boy?

If He did shouldn’t we imitate Jesus and also memorize scripture?

Also how would it be possible that Jesus would astound the doctors of the scriptures in the temple when He was 12 with his knowledge of the scriptures if He didn’t memorize scripture?

I don’t even know why this thread has gone on this long. anyone who doesn’t believe that we as Catholics should memorize scripture is just plain wrong–I guarantee you that if someone asked Pope Benedict XVI if it was a good idea to memorize scripture he would say yes!
The who thing started in reference to someone who does not understand the pedagogical importance of memorization and to memory’s role in forming our identity. St. Augustine wrote at length on the matter. My guess is that he had committed thousands of pages to memory if not to total recall and could reproduce at will compositions in the same style of many Latin masters.
 
Does anyone know if the New Grail Psalms that will now be used at mass have a better meter than the NAB?
 
The DRE at a church in my area states:
“We do not encourage anyone to memorize bible verses because the person may misinterpret the bible verses.”
What do the forum members think about that comment?
The DRE is probably overreacting to fundamentalist bible-thumpers, who often do get scripture wrong. But memorizing scripture in no way guarantees false interpretation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top