Dress Like a Man

  • Thread starter Thread starter eightydeuce82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, reverence springs from the heart. For me, communion on the tongue absolutely is not more reverent.

And if you had gone to a Mass celebrated by St. Pope John Paul II, you might have received standing and in the hand.

traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A324rcCommunionHand.html

http://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A324rcCommunionHand.html
Tiny particles of the Eucharist get on your hand when you touch it. During consecration, do you see the priest put his hands over the chalice so that any particles go in there? What do you think happens when a person takes the Eucharist and walks away? Those particles of Jesus are now on the floor.
 
The Money Excuse – Some men use the excuse that they can’t, or others can’t, afford appropriate clothing. Most American men across economic classes have plenty of money to buy all kinds of expensive clothing and other things. For those who truly have limited financial resources, discount/thrift stores sell very inexpensive clothing. It is unmanly to falsely use a lack of money as an excuse for disrespectful attire.

The “Parish Culture” Excuse – Many parishes celebrate a deliberate culture of a casual dress for Mass. The rationale is that somehow dressing down encourages parishioners to be more comfortable and friendly, as if community building were the point of the Mass, rather than the worship and communion with Our Lord Jesus Christ. It is unmanly to be a cowardly conformist or to be ignorant about something as important as the Mass. Catholic men need to be countercultural, even in their own parishes.

DRESSING LIKE A MAN FOR MASS
In contrast to unmanly excuses, here are some manly reasons why dressing like a man for
Mass is important:

The Mass is infinitely more important than any worldly event – A man should wear his very best clothing for every Mass is of infinite value. While cultures around the world vary, a reasonable standard in the U.S. for men’s dress for Mass is a dark suit, collared shirt, a tie and dress shoes (for examples of how men dress for important occasions in the U.S., see presidential portraits, presidential medal awards, Heisman Trophy finalists, wedding attire or even what young men wear to prom, etc.). Every single Mass is infinitely more important than even the most important worldly event, for Jesus Christ Himself is present.
Justice demands that men give their best to Christ – Post-modern men need to become re-acquainted with virtue, especially the cardinal virtue of Justice. The word “virtue” comes from the Latin virtutem, meaning “moral strength, high character, manliness and excellence.” The root word of “virtue” is the Latin, vir, which literally means “man.” Men have always been called to virtue and to be virtuous is considered “manly.”

“The broader principle of proper spiritual preparation to approach Christ does not negate Christ’s most basic teaching about respectful dress. Clothing is one aspect of a man’s inner preparation and is also a signal to other men about his reverence of his Lord and King. Paul also warns men to not approach the Eucharist in an unworthy manner to avoid bringing down wrath and judgment of God upon themselves (1 Cor 11:27).
I really appreciate your two posts on the subject of men dressing properly for Mass. I don’t usually judge those men who wear jeans and a t-shirt to Mass, but I admire those men who show such care for our Lord that they dress-up, wearing a suit, or at least business clothing.

I, too, don’t buy the excuse that it’s too expensive to wear nice clothing to Mass. I buy most of my clothes for Mass at thrift stores (skirts, blouses, sweaters).

It is indeed counter-cultural for men to dress up for Mass. I think it’s human nature to want to fit in, which I understand, but since we are in the presence of God himself, I think it’s appropriate to act like it’s something special. Reverence and devotion should go beyond just an inner attitude. I get it that most Catholics will disagree, and that’s fine. But the OP makes a lot of sense.
 
This looks like the old Girm. The new one, I believe, says nothing about “providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons.” What these reasons could have been, I can not imagine. The norm and preferred method in the universal Latin Rite is kneeling and on the tongue.
I noticed that after I posted, so I removed the post. It was also less charitable than it could have been. For that, I apologize.
 
Tiny particles of the Eucharist get on your hand when you touch it. During consecration, do you see the priest put his hands over the chalice so that any particles go in there? What do you think happens when a person takes the Eucharist and walks away? Those particles of Jesus are now on the floor.
When I receive in hand, I LOOK to see if anything remains in my hands after I consume the host. If there is, I consume what’s left as well. Simple.

It’s ridiculous for people to suggest that communion on one’s tongue is “better” than communion in hand.
 
Like, I didn’t read all 9 pages. However, unless someone comes in looking like a hoochie or in a suit that looks like an Easter egg, I don’t really pay any attention. Maybe jeans are the only thing a person can afford. Maybe those ratty shoes that looks terrible are the only ones that person has and they wear them to work at an auto mechanic shop too.

I have always dressed nice for Mass, I dressed nice when I was a protestant, as well. Sometimes I wear a dress, sometimes it is dress pants (sometimes a girl just doesn’t want to shave:D;))

I am now in the medical field, just started last week, so I didn’t have to worry about this Mass. Most weekends I will work. My next weekend off is the last weekend this month. Can’t go to the Vigil because I need my sleep, so I will be going to the early morning Mass on Sundays. I will show up in my scrubs and tennis shoes. Let someone say something to me. I just came off of a long shift and I don’t have time for people to be snotty. :dts: And people who think snotty things will have to deal with God.
Do you wear your scrubs and tennis shoes to Mass because you have to work before or after Mass on Sundays? I can understand your situation, especially if you work nights. You could try bringing your clothing for Mass to work with you, and changing after work. I’ve done that a couple of times, when my work schedule was close to my attending Mass.

I used to work in the medical field - hospital (name removed by moderator)atient oncology - with post-op patients. I was so exhausted and my feet hurt so much after my shifts!

Just being able to attend Mass on Sundays is the main thing, of course. 🙂
 
When I receive in hand, I LOOK to see if anything remains in my hands after I consume the host. If there is, I consume what’s left as well. Simple.

It’s ridiculous for people to suggest that communion on one’s tongue is “better” than communion in hand.
I am not talking about large chucks. I am talking about microscopic particles. Unless you actually lick your hand, particles are falling on the floor when you put your hands down and walk away.

I did not say that receiving communion is “better” in the mouth. I am simply saying what scientifically happens when people receive on the hand.

wdtprs.com/blog/2009/03/hand-in-glove-02-another-communion-in-the-hand-experiment/
 
Showing partiality is not the issue. I met a poor man as I was walking into Church. He was diabetic and sick and asked to see the priest. I led him to where the priest was.

Most of us, can afford to dress better. Not fancy, but better.

Ed
 
I am not talking about large chucks. I am talking about microscopic particles. Unless you actually lick your hand, particles are falling on the floor when you put your hands down and walk away.

I did not say that receiving communion is “better” in the mouth. I am simply saying what scientifically happens when people receive on the hand.

wdtprs.com/blog/2009/03/hand-in-glove-02-another-communion-in-the-hand-experiment/
“Microscopic particles” which cannot be seen are not the Eucharist. Much like dissolving a consecrated host in water and then pouring the liquid down a sacrarium which you cannot do with an intact host.

For those who cannot accept that, they could just lick their palms.
 
Says who? Popular culture? You? The Church certainly makes no such demand. The ridiculous part is that you’re defining a specific uniform as being “presentable.” Not only is your definition of “presentable” arbitrary, there are a zillion other definitions with the exact same amount of credibility.

Just what makes “a suit, tie, simple shirt and appropriate shoes” so darned special?
I’ve been in more than a few business environments. A suit and tie are required. Why? To look presentable for our boss, supervisor, customers or clients. It is a sign of respect for others. It doesn’t matter what other ways exist – we must look our best. If you’re going for a job interview, are you going to dress well or just walk in wearing whatever?

No. God is deserving of our best. I was in a poor area of town and entered a small, Mexican Church. Both the men and women knew how to dress. I could feel the presence of the Holy Spirit.

Ed
 
“Microscopic particles” which cannot be seen are not the Eucharist. Much like dissolving a consecrated host in water and then pouring the liquid down a sacrarium which you cannot do with an intact host.

For those who cannot accept that, they could just lick their palms.
If it comes off the host, then what is it if not the Eucharist?

Perhaps microscopic was not the correct word. Did you see the link I posted?
 
If it comes off the host, then what is it if not the Eucharist?

Perhaps microscopic was not the correct word. Did you see the link I posted?
Perhaps you need to do some research with regard to what happens when a host (or a fragment of a host) is no longer recognizable as a host.
 
I’ve been in more than a few business environments. A suit and tie are required. Why? To look presentable for our boss, supervisor, customers or clients. It is a sign of respect for others. It doesn’t matter what other ways exist – we must look our best. If you’re going for a job interview, are you going to dress well or just walk in wearing whatever?
Yes, to follow a secular convention – one that is rapidly changing by the way.

If a job applicant showed up for MANY jobs in a suit, they likely wouldn’t be hired or they would be looked at oddly.
No. God is deserving of our best. I was in a poor area of town and entered a small, Mexican Church. Both the men and women knew how to dress. I could feel the presence of the Holy Spirit.

Ed
Who is to say a suit/tie is “best” simply because it’s expected in some secular settings? In this day and age I can see where a suit/tie at Mass looks more ostentatious, more odd and more fake than anything else.

If you think one’s garb is the “presence of the Holy Spirit”, then I’m not sure what to say.
 
Yes, to follow a secular convention – one that is rapidly changing by the way.

If a job applicant showed up for MANY jobs in a suit, they likely wouldn’t be hired or they would be looked at oddly.

Who is to say a suit/tie is “best” simply because it’s expected in some secular settings? In this day and age I can see where a suit/tie at Mass looks more ostentatious, more odd and more fake than anything else.

If you think one’s garb is the “presence of the Holy Spirit”, then I’m not sure what to say.
Sir,

I think I’ve made myself quite clear. God bless.

Ed
 
All the more reason not to be neurotic about different ways of receiving Holy Communion.
Well, one person’s idea of neurosis is another person’s concern for the Sacred Body of our Lord.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top