Early islamic historians, how important are they to muslims?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chabambou
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Laws in the Quran commence with the words “It has been enjoined…” not “you may…”

There is no law on multiple wives.

.
So everything in the quran is not islamic law? This is news to me.

Im sure if the quran specifies a man can have more than 1 wife, its a law? 🤷
 
All of the Prophets wives were for the purposes of protection during war and conflict.

If you look at the saintly companions of Prophet Muhammad, you will see that they were monogamous. Bilal, Abu Dharr el-Ghiffari, Ammar Ibn Yassir, Owais Qarni etc etc

.
Most of the "saintly companions’ at that time were tribal warlords. But, if they were so saintly, why didn’t they marry a dozen women to “protect them during war and conflict”? Did they have enough slave concubines?

Your arguments don’t hold water.
 
So everything in the quran is not islamic law? This is news to me.

Im sure if the quran specifies a man can have more than 1 wife, its a law? 🤷
Maybe a clarification of the meaning of the word “law” will help.

Governments when passing down laws are not abiguous. Wear seatbelts, no speeding, no violence etc etc. No “may” in a law.

This verse in the Quran is ambiguous at best. It is the response to this ambiguity which is the test from God in the sincerity of the human heart.

.
 
Most of the "saintly companions’ at that time were tribal warlords. But, if they were so saintly, why didn’t they marry a dozen women to “protect them during war and conflict”? Did they have enough slave concubines?

Your arguments don’t hold water.
I don’t know with certainty the specific circumstances around the conflicts, I’m sorry.

We only go with what we have in the records available.

.
 
I don’t know with certainty the specific circumstances around the conflicts, I’m sorry.

We only go with what we have in the records available.

.
Great, Since we have brought this thread back to the topic, can you share some of the key sources of the information. I have the Koran and the hadiths. Is there more?
 
Maybe a clarification of the meaning of the word “law” will help.

Governments when passing down laws are not abiguous. Wear seatbelts, no speeding, no violence etc etc. No “may” in a law.

This verse in the Quran is ambiguous at best. It is the response to this ambiguity which is the test from God in the sincerity of the human heart.

.
Since you are a big fan of word play, lets look at it this way then, here is the verse again:

Sahih International: And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice].

Dictionary meaning:

May: Use to express possibility

Then: used to indicate what happened or happens next

It does not say you ‘may’ or ‘might’. Its stating then, as in you can, but only if you can treat them fairly. To me, this is giving permission to a man to marry up to 4 women.

This is not a law? Is it not allah giving muslims permission to marry more than 1 wife?
 
Since you are a big fan of word play, lets look at it this way then, here is the verse again:

Sahih International: And if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that you may not incline [to injustice].

Dictionary meaning:

May: Use to express possibility

Then: used to indicate what happened or happens next

It does not say you ‘may’ or ‘might’. Its stating then, as in you can, but only if you can treat them fairly. To me, this is giving permission to a man to marry up to 4 women.

This is not a law? Is it not allah giving muslims permission to marry more than 1 wife?
You missed the word “BUT” at the start of the next sentence 🙂

.
 
That’s not even 1/150th of the top of the iceberg.::yup:

MJ
The fact that a sinless being such as Abdu’l-Baha worshipped His own Father as the Lord of creation, and attributed His sinless life totally to His Father’s Divine nature, should tell you something.

One’s response to that reality is a good indication of where one is in their relationship with God…

.
 
You missed the word “BUT” at the start of the next sentence 🙂

.
dolphinlove…“Since you are a big fan of word play, lets look at it this way then, here is the verse again”

You proved dolphinlove’s point :rolleyes:
 
dolphinlove…“Since you are a big fan of word play, lets look at it this way then, here is the verse again”

You proved dolphinlove’s point :rolleyes:
There’s a difference between “wordplay” and “reading with precision and clarity”

I recommend it for the Bible and the Quran. Critical in fact…

.
 
There’s a difference between “wordplay” and “reading with precision and clarity”

I recommend it for the Bible and the Quran. Critical in fact…

.
The Koran, as I recall, was written in early medieval Arabic, not English. At that time the language had no written vowels, so interpreting the original text is difficult. Those who read Arabic find the original text nearly incomprehensible, and generally deal with this problem by saying something like “but it is beautiful; I don’t have to understand every word; it all comes from God”. These are actual explanations I have received from Arabic speaking Muslims.

This debate about text analysis of the modern English translation, and there are many DIFFERENT translations, seems a little pointless.
 
I don’t know with certainty the specific circumstances around the conflicts, I’m sorry.

We only go with what we have in the records available.

.
Records available? The hadiths a historical record used by Islamic historians?
 
Records available? The hadiths a historical record used by Islamic historians?
Hadiths have proven to be unreliable Jimmy.

Many contradict with each other and even more still contradict with the Quran.

In a court of law they would be all thrown out …

.
 
Hadiths have proven to be unreliable Jimmy.

Many contradict with each other and even more still contradict with the Quran.

In a court of law they would be all thrown out …

.
But, elsewhere you have stated that it is the Koran and the hadiths, And you have not revealed which version/translation of the Koran you use to substantiate your claims.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top