Early islamic historians, how important are they to muslims?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chabambou
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God taught both the first, through a prophet. The second in person, God in the flesh. The first was under the OT law given to a specific people in covenant relationship with God. God was forming and teaching that people. “An eye for an eye” is teaching them how to be just. The punishment must fit the crime in other words don’t over punish in anger, but in proportion to the crime. Jesus, God come in the flesh, is elevating the moral standard, not contradicting it, teaching mercy.
Thankyou jhargus, any fair minded person can appreciate that explanation 🙂

Ok, now give me the areas where you feel there are contradictions in Islam and I will give you an equally fair-minded explanation.

I hope and pray that you will similarly be a fair-minded soul? 🙂

.
 
Is it confusing for you Servant?
Not all Jimmy.

One asks me that seeking justice for the action of others is the right approach

The other tells me not to seek justice for the action of others.

They are two opposing actions.

But as you can see above, I accepted, with fair-mindedness, the explanation of jhargus.

I could easily argue this contradicting action from OT to NT till I’m blue in the face.
I hope that idle argument is replaced with fair-minded insight on these threads.

🙂

.
 
Not all Jimmy.

One asks me that seeking justice for the action of others is the right approach

The other tells me not to seek justice for the action of others.

They are two opposing actions.

But as you can see above, I accepted, with fair-mindedness, the explanation of jhargus.

I could easily argue this contradicting action from OT to NT till I’m blue in the face.
I hope that idle argument is replaced with fair-minded insight on these threads.

🙂

.
It’s related to the new law of…He who has no sin , cast the first stone.God has now turned the other cheek to mankind sins.
 
Not all Jimmy.

One asks me that seeking justice for the action of others is the right approach

The other tells me not to seek justice for the action of others.

They are two opposing actions.

But as you can see above, I accepted, with fair-mindedness, the explanation of jhargus.

I could easily argue this contradicting action from OT to NT till I’m blue in the face.
I hope that idle argument is replaced with fair-minded insight on these threads.
Turning the other cheek means not to return insult for insult in retaliation, which is what most people expect and how worldly people act. Responding to hatred with love just might grab someone’s attention and afford us a chance to share the Gospel. When we respond in a manner that is unnatural, it displays the supernatural power of the indwelling Holy Spirit. Jesus was the perfect example because He was silent before His accusers and did not call down revenge from heaven on those who crucified Him.
 
Jesus did not always display passiveness. Hostility towards Himself He responded with gentleness but Jesus expressed anger at injustice when He overthrew tables at the temple of the money changers. Had a Hitler attacked the people at that time Jesus would have defended them like Muhammad did in His time.

Aren’t we talking about two entirely different laws for two different dispensations here?

And isn’t one law referring to individuals and the other society in general?

For instance if a person insults me I don’t insult him in return but if a person attack a country we must defend the innocent women and children from a tyrant!!

We can forgive someone who does a wrong towards us but would Christ have told us to forgive a Hitler and not defend ourselves against his slaughter?

Muhammad taught self defense also but individually we are supposed to repay hate with love as it teaches a person love.

If in your home you are forgiving to one another your children will follow. But if at the outset of every dispute the adults become defensive and argumentive the children will grow up wild and rude having never learned courtesy.
 
It’s related to the new law of…He who has no sin , cast the first stone.God has now turned the other cheek to mankind sins.
Is this aspect of the new law asking me to do the exact opposite of the old law?

.
 
Turning the other cheek means not to return insult for insult in retaliation, which is what most people expect and how worldly people act. Responding to hatred with love just might grab someone’s attention and afford us a chance to share the Gospel. When we respond in a manner that is unnatural, it displays the supernatural power of the indwelling Holy Spirit. Jesus was the perfect example because He was silent before His accusers and did not call down revenge from heaven on those who crucified Him.
Thankyou Jimmy. I am fully aware of what it means and the higher spirit behind its action.

The question is if this turning the other cheek is asking me to do the opposite of an eye for an eye?

.
 
What would Muhammad do ?
Please answer my question and then we can talk about Muhammad 🙂

I think our dialogue would be better and more fruitful if we establish truth together before we move on to the next step.

.
 
Please answer my question and then we can talk about Muhammad 🙂

I think our dialogue would be better and more fruitful if we establish truth together before we move on to the next step.

.
Servant you are just playing games, you know that Christianity is a different religion from Judaism.
 
Servant you are just playing games, you know that Christianity is a different religion from Judaism.
No games Techno

If someone says that God is true in Judaism, and then God is true in Christianity but then Islam is not from God because it CONTRADICTS the God of the Jews and Christianity, I want to get to the bottom of it.

So, let’s get to the bottom of it.

The world is tired of this anti-Islam, anti-Baha’i double standard chit chat.

Let’s thrash this out and expose the truth.

Please answer the question.

.
 
No games Techno

If someone says that God is true in Judaism, and then God is true in Christianity but then Islam is not from God because it CONTRADICTS the God of the Jews and Christianity, I want to get to the bottom of it.

So, let’s get to the bottom of it.

The world is tired of this anti-Islam, anti-Baha’i double standard chit chat.

Let’s thrash this out and expose the truth.

Please answer the question.

.
Christianity has a true connection to Judaism that can clearly be shown, whereas Islam has no connection to either.
 
Christianity has a true connection to Judaism that can clearly be shown, whereas Islam has no connection to either.
You can’t answer the question I see.

It’s very telling all this. and you tell me I’m playing games :eek:

.
 
Any progress on the importance of Islamic historians yet?

🍿
We would be on page 2 and over and done with if there wasn’t this anti-Islamic agenda and questions were answered Kaninchen lol

Tony posted some interesting stuff on Shiah scholars a page or two ago.

Maybe we can discuss Islam without having to face a barrage of ill-educated statements about Islam and make some progress?

.
 
We would be on page 2 and over and done with if there wasn’t this anti-Islamic agenda and questions were answered Kaninchen lol

Tony posted some interesting stuff on Shiah scholars a page or two ago.

Maybe we can discuss Islam without having to face a barrage of ill-educated statements about Islam and make some progress?

.
This was from one of the links

SERMON 17

About those who sit for dispensation of justice among people but are not fit for it.

Among (1) all the people the most detested before Allah are two persons. One is he who is devoted to his self. So he is deviated from the true path and loves speaking about (foul) innovations and inviting towards wrong path. He is therefore a nuisance for those who are enamoured of him, is himself misled from the guidance of those preceding him, misleads those who follow him in his life or after his death, carries the weight of others’ sins and is entangled in his own misdeeds.

The other man is he who has picked up ignorance. He moves among the ignorant, is senseless in the thick of mischief and is blind to the advantages of peace. Those resembling like men have named him scholar but he is not so. He goes out early morning to collect things whose deficiency is better than plenty, till when he has quenched his thirst from polluted water and acquired meaningless things.

He sits among the people as a judge responsible for solving whatever is confusing to the others. If an ambiguous problem is presented before him he manages shabby argument about it of his own accord and passes judgement on its basis. In this way he is entangled in the confusion of doubts as in the spider’s web, not knowing whether he was right or wrong. If he is right he fears lest he erred, while if he is wrong he hopes he is right. He is ignorant, wandering astray in ignorance and riding on carriages aimlessly moving in darkness. He did not try to find reality of knowledge. He scatters the traditions as the wind scatters the dry leaves.

By Allah, he is not capable of solving the problems that come to him nor is fit for the position assigned to him. Whatever he does not know he does not regard it worth knowing. He does not realise that what is beyond his reach is within the reach of others. If anything is not clear to him he keeps quiet over it because he knows his own ignorance. Lost lives are crying against his unjust verdicts, and properties (that have been wrongly disposed of) are grumbling against him.

I complain to Allah about persons who live ignorant and die misguided. For them nothing is more worthless than Qur’an if it is recited as it should be recited, nor anything more valuable than the Qur’an if its verses are removed from their places, nor anything more vicious than virtue nor more virtuous than vice.

(1). Amir al-mu’minin has held two categories of persons as the most detestable by Allah and the worst among people. Firstly, those who are misguided even in basic tenets and are busy in the spreading of evil. Secondly, those who abandon the Qur’an and sunnah and pronounce injunctions through their imagination. They create a circle of their devotees and popularise the religious code of law concocted by themselves.

The misguidance and wrongfulness of such persons does not remain confined to their own selves but the seed of misguidance sown by them bears fruit and growing into the form of a big tree provides asylum to the misguided and this misguidance goes on multiplying.

And since these very people are the real originators the weight of other’s sins is also on their shoulders as the Qur’an says: And certainly they shall bear their own burdens, and (other) burdens with their own burdens… (29:13)

Interesting!

Regards Tony
 
We would be on page 2 and over and done with if there wasn’t this anti-Islamic agenda and questions were answered Kaninchen lol

Tony posted some interesting stuff on Shiah scholars a page or two ago.

Maybe we can discuss Islam without having to face a barrage of ill-educated statements about Islam and make some progress?

.
No anti Islamic agenda here, Otherwise the mods would intervene, 🙂

MJ
 
Thankyou jhargus, any fair minded person can appreciate that explanation 🙂

Ok, now give me the areas where you feel there are contradictions in Islam and I will give you an equally fair-minded explanation.

I hope and pray that you will similarly be a fair-minded soul? 🙂 .
The contradictions I am speaking about are those things in the Koran which contradict the Word of God. The Word delivered and lived by God in the flesh, Jesus Christ. Such as the crucifiction, death, burial and bodily resurrection of Jesus etc…

As worldcitizen a Bahia stated, when Gods speaks and we know its His Word we don’t need to question. God in the flesh has spoken it is finished.

377
 
The contradictions I am speaking about are those things in the Koran which contradict the Word of God. The Word delivered and lived by God in the flesh, Jesus Christ. Such as the crucifiction, death, burial and bodily resurrection of Jesus etc…

As worldcitizen a Bahia stated, when Gods speaks and we know its His Word we don’t need to question. God in the flesh has spoken it is finished.

377
Thankyou jhargus.

Let us take the crucifixion for example. The Holy Quran states:

“And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah’s messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them…”

Prophet Muhammad is rebuking those who “say” that they killed the Messiah, and revealing the truth behind His Reality not being dead at all.

Now let us look at what Prophet Muhammad states about the Muslim martyrs:

“And say not of those who are killed in the Way of Allah, “They are dead.” Nay, they are living, but you perceive (it) not. [Al-Baqrah, vers 154]”

Is Prophet Muhammad denying the sacrifice made by the martyrs here?

If not, then what is your understanding as a result of these two verses?

.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top