M
Mickey
Guest
I suppose you have your perspective.I don’t see bitterness in his words.
Indeed.Per chance his words could be taken at face value?
I suppose you have your perspective.I don’t see bitterness in his words.
Indeed.Per chance his words could be taken at face value?
In reality, your original post that I commented onWhat are you talking about!! I gave my personal experience. If you want to read in strange comparisons based on your prejudice, that is your problem.
[Many] [Orthodox] do not want them to exist–just as [many] Roman Catholics do not know or care that they exist.
made a general * comparison of EO and RC treatment of the “poor Eastern Catholics”, in general*. The comparison, especially with the “just as” equivalence, denies reality. It would be simple for you to amend the offensive remark; instead you divert to attention to my alleged bitterness.The poor Eastern Catholics often find themselves caught in no man’s land.
There is no offense. Ask any Eastern Catholic. Many (not all) Orthodox see them as traitors. Many (not all) RC’s do not know or care of their existence. It is a cold hard fact. There is no need for bitterness.The comparison, especially with the “just as” equivalence, denies reality. It would be simple for you to amend the offensive remark; instead you divert to attention to my alleged bitterness.
Agreed.I think discussion of my attitude is probably not appropriate for the forum.
God bless you.But I do wish to respond. My attitude is arguably better measured by the great amount of time and treasure that I have spent helping to grow an EO mission in my town; .
This comment is moot. You do not know me.I have probably spent more time praying in EO churches that you.
Amen. Sadly, there are oftentimes different versions of reality.Reality should be respected.
What is missing in the comment, and thus what makes your earlier comparison offensive, are the all too real actions taken in association with the attitudes.There is no offense. Ask any Eastern Catholic. Many (not all) Orthodox see them as traitors. Many (not all) RC’s do not know or care of their existence. It is a cold hard fact.
There is no offensiveness and you are the only one who has taken some type of imaginary offense. I love my Eastern Catholic brethren.What is missing in the comment, and thus what makes your earlier comparison offensive, are the all too real actions taken in association with the attitudes.
He is NOT the only one. Don’t put it on him. As someone has stated:There is no offensiveness and you are the only one who has taken some type of imaginary offense. I love my Eastern Catholic brethren. .
Sadly, there are oftentimes different versions of reality.
Bones picked how they may be, if you are tired or arguing, leave last words.Pick your bone with someone else. I’m tired of arguing with you
He has attempted to defend his remarks. He does not need your help. If you have a problem, state it clearly and move on.Agree to disagree. But don’t put it on him.
OK, I will state it clearly:He has attempted to defend his remarks. He does not need your help. If you have a problem, state it clearly and move on.
This is incorrect. He is not the only one who has perceived this comparison offensive. The Roman who doesn’t know who I am is not the same as the Orthodox who slanders my existence as a Greek Catholic or justifies the attempted liquidation of our church in Eastern Europe.There is no offensiveness and you are the only one who has taken some type of imaginary offense. I love my Eastern Catholic brethren. .
Sigh. Here is my original post:This is incorrect. He is not the only one who has perceived this comparison offensive. The Roman who doesn’t know who I am is not the same as the Orthodox who slanders my existence as a Greek Catholic or justifies the attempted liquidation of our church in Eastern Europe.
I am but a wretched sinner and an anonymous entity on an internet forum. You are not compelled to follow my commands.But I beg, don’t be so peremptory as to tell me whom I can or cannot defend or command me to move on.
I agree with this.[Many] do not want them to exist–just as [many] Roman Catholics do not know or care that they exist.
The poor Eastern Catholics often find themselves caught in no man’s land.![]()
Ah, here is the heart of the problem. You write about the existence of EC’s: opposition to this existence by EO’s, and ignorance of it by the RC’s. What does this opposition mean? You present here the idea that it benignly reflects a desire that EC’s return to Orthodoxy. And say that SS takes things further by taking about the liquidation of churches.Here is my original post:
[Many] do not want them to exist–just as [many] Roman Catholics do not know or care that they exist …
I am sorry if you and your friend misunderstood my remark. As you know, the Orthodox feel that the Eastern Catholics should return to Orthodoxy–their original patrimony. The fact that Roman Catholics did not care if I existed as an Eastern Catholic was no different (to me) than the Orthodox feeling that I should return to my original patrimony.
Then you take this further by talking about the liquidation of Churches.
Both sides? I am not sure what blood you are talking about, and have absolutely no idea what blood you are thinking of attributing to my particular Church. I also have no idea how this is relevant.I do not think I need to tell you the amount of blood spilled on both sides, in many different countries.
Thanks again.If you and your friend have been insulted by my remarks, I apologize to both of you–and anyone else lurking, who may have been offended.
No. The heart of the problem is that you will not let it go. I apologized to you and SS. Is that not enough for you?Ah, here is the heart of the problem.
I’m sure we can both provide some sad historical persecutions. Perhaps you can ask the moderator if she will allow a thread about it.But the liquidation of churches is the ultimate manifestation of the attitude of not wanting us to exist.
Many here agree with my statement. It is too bad that you cannot accept my personal apology to you. There is not much more I can do.You may not be sensitive to how others feel on this point
And I am sorry that you are unable to accept a sincere apology.but sorry that you seem to miss how inflammatory your post - as written - is.
Read your history. For starters, look at Croatia.Both sides? I am not sure what blood you are talking about
I thanked you for the apology (twice). I took it as sincere, and only thus thought it worthwhile to try to make the point that you are still missing. You write about EC’s as being in no man’s land, and I think that notion is expressed as regrettable. I appreciate that sentiment.No. The heart of the problem is that you will not let it go. I apologized to you and SS. Is that not enough for you?
I honestly have no idea of any relevance of Croatia on an Eastern Catholic board. Is this yet another example of our being treated as “no man”?For starters, look at Croatia
Perhaps, but no one has yet concurred with your “just as” equivalance between Latin ignorance and Orthodoxy’s wanting us not to exist.Many here agree with my statement.
I did and do again thank you for it.It is too bad that you cannot accept my personal apology to you.
But there is, and that is precisely the point. Accept our existence. Accept our history. Bear it in mind when talking to EC’s. Promote our acceptance within the EO church. Promote the idea of an honest appraisal, and, as warranted, an expression of regret for the role of the EO church in the liquidation of EC churces. That is a start.There is not much more I can do.
I accept all my brethren in Christ with love and kindness–EO, RC, EC, and protestant. I am aware of Church history (ancient and recent). The communists were a ruthless Godless people. But if an Eastern Catholic begins to lean towards Holy Orthodoxy and they ask my opinion, I always tell them that they should return to their original patrimony.But there is, and that is precisely the point. Accept our existence. Accept our history. Bear it in mind when talking to EC’s. Promote our acceptance within the EO church. Promote the idea of an honest appraisal, and, as warranted, an expression of regret for the role of the EO church in the liquidation of EC churces.
Quite a few of the Latin rite under Rome don’t want them to exist either.Subrosa said:%between%By the way - if you were to join an “Eastern Catholic Church” you would be offending the Orthodox Church that you find so intriguing. The topic of Uniatism in those churches is one of the most volitile subjects that confronts both east and west. The Orthodox don’t want them to exist.
Good point.Isa_Almisry said:Quite a few of the Latin rite under Rome don’t want them to exist either.
Yes, it depends where you are out, or what’s the history. The Melkites, for instance have excellent relations with the Orthodox, the UGCC, not so good.Really? Is that so? I’m Orthodox, search my posts. Have I ever said anything you wrote? No, because if you lived where I do you’d experience a whole different world.
The Orthodox and Greek/Byzantine Catholics work together today, we’re friends (and for the most part family too). No one wants to re-live what our people went through earlier last century.
So these days we all go to each other’s funerals, etc…
We’re friends, even lots of the Byzcaths/Greek Catholics come to the Sunday of Orthodoxy (usually like 15 parishes come to one church, it changes every year).
Come here, there are LOTS of Orthodox and Byzantine/Greek Catholics. You’d never hear any of the accusations that are made in this thread.
It’s a rather wide-sweeping assumption that every Orthodox will talk negatively about Eastern Catholics, it’s taboo to do so where I am from. It’s more than taboo, it is completely unacceptable.
I know all the Byzantine and Greek Catholic priests around here and they are all highly respected and wonderful men. Their churches are packed with the best people in the world. Since we are friends and often cousins, sisters, brothers… speaking in any bad manner about them would be considered rude to the highest degree where I live. And they extend the same to the Orthodox as well. When someone passes say an Eastern Catholic, usually even the Orthodox priests go to the Funeral. vice-versa the Byzantine Catholic priests often come to the Orthodox Funerals.
So, if anyone is being rude ignore them. It’s not how it functions in the real world, and in my part of the world is made up of a high percentage of Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholics.
And this all reminded me, me and my friends are going to have to schedule our visit to the Byzantine Catholic Church in town. They come visit us for Liturgy and we visit them for Liturgy.
hello mickey[Many] do not want them to exist–just as [many] Roman Catholics do not know or care that they exist.
The poor Eastern Catholics often find themselves caught in no man’s land.
[Moderator Note: This discussion on the relationship the Eastern Catholic Churches have with the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches was sufficiently off-topic to create a new thread from them. Please http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=213092”]see here for the original discussion.]
Depends on which Orthodox Church you are referring to. We in the UGCC have excellent relations with the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Ecumenical Patriarchate; the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kyivan Patriarchate. The relations are not always so good with the Moscow Patriarchate; but neither are the relations good with the Orthodox churches I have mentioned and the Moscow Patriarchate (nor often between Constantinople and Moscow for that matter).Yes, it depends where you are out, or what’s the history. The Melkites, for instance have excellent relations with the Orthodox, the UGCC, not so good.
And…?Quite a few of the Latin rite under Rome don’t want them to exist either.