J
jimmy
Guest
it actually reads:Hesychios;5785353 said:[Members of the Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own Churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of communion by Christians of these Churches. (canon 844 § 3). /QUOTE]
Your quoting of the Code of Canon Law 884§3. is in accuate.
Please refer to: vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2T.HTM
“Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick** licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church if they seek such on their own accord and are properly disposed.** This is also valid for members of other Churches which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition in regard to the sacraments as these Eastern Churches.”
I’ve added the bolding.
The quote you add speaks of the matter of validity from the side of the Catholic minister. Hesychios is still correct though because the code still exhorts the Orthodox person to follow the disciplinary code of their own Church and seek the permission of their bishop to recieve Catholic sacraments.
As Hesychios said, the practice of the early Church was that you were only to commune with those who held to the true faith. So if you look at the history of the Church you will see that various Churches had dyptichs which listed the orthodox bishops of the major sees as a sign of who they were in communion with. You will also see various patristic writers telling their flock to not commune with heretics. For example, Severus of Antioch who was a supposed monophysite declared in a letter to a member of his patriarchate that they could not worship with those who followed the council of Chalcedon. And if out of necessity they were forced to worship with the Chalcedonians they were not to recieve the sacrament.