P
Polak
Guest
And to stay alive presumably?Only that the food we eat and the reason for eating should be for good health alone.
Btw are we not allowed to eat if we are not hungry?
And to stay alive presumably?Only that the food we eat and the reason for eating should be for good health alone.
I think a more appropriate analogy would be a calender rather than a watch. And the good father’s views are more applicable to a calender that was correct a very long time ago.Lol, yes. Of course there are many of his views which are unwarranted to say the least, but even a broken watch is right twice a day.
And didn’t someone turn water into wine at some wedding if memory serves? I trust Ripperger is teetotal. Actually, anything other than water for him would be hypocritical.With all due respect to Fr. Ripperger, it sounds like he’s stripped one of the purposes of eating out of the act. I’d be similarly skeptical of a priest who said that a husband and wife shouldn’t have sex if one of them wasn’t fertile.
Yes, nutrition is one purpose of eating but community and socialization are another. I’ll certainly admit sitting at home getting your clothes dirty with cheetos dust sounds a great deal like gluttony, but a bunch of friends enjoying cheetos and coke while watching a game does not. Food is not just for feeding us physically.
It is no coincidence that when Christ gives Himself to us He does so in the form of the Eucharistic Feast. Food is not just about nutrition but about fulfillment.
So where does that leave chocolate?That eating should always be done for health.
I’m not sure what your point is here. I mean, Jesus didn’t turn a sack of corn into a bag of Doritos.And didn’t someone turn water into wine at some wedding if memory serves?
I thought it was pointing out that people drink wine for pleasure and Jesus had no problem with it. Too obscure?Freddy:
I’m not sure what your point is here. I mean, Jesus didn’t turn a sack of corn into a bag of Doritos.And didn’t someone turn water into wine at some wedding if memory serves?
The very same.Is this the same priest who says Harry Potter is demonic?
Does this mean that it’s “gluttony from luxury” to want your steak medium rare instead of well done? Or is it “gluttony from luxury” to eat steak at all?The traditional understanding of gluttony is twofold: 1) gluttony from excess, and 2) gluttony from luxury.
Gluttony from excess is when we don’t moderate our behavior or what we consume.
Gluttony from luxury is when we are unduly particular about things having to be a certain way.
Both of these things are opposed to Christian virtue and to the way Our Lord lived. A good way to develop the corresponding virtue is to practice intermittent fasting and this is something that has been practiced for 2000+ years and it does work.
Peace.
I do believe there’s some in the fridge. A little treat before bed I think.Well I’ll take what he says with a grain of salt.
Nothing wrong with enjoying a perfectly ripe strawberry .
I give thanks to God while eating it.
Not too obscure but a little out of context. He did so for a wedding. It wasn’t simply “for pleasure”. A Jewish wedding wasn’t just some excuse to throw a party, it was an event in which God was witness to a very important ritual.1Lord1Faith:
I thought it was pointing out that people drink wine for pleasure and Jesus had no problem with it. Too obscure?Freddy:
I’m not sure what your point is here. I mean, Jesus didn’t turn a sack of corn into a bag of Doritos.And didn’t someone turn water into wine at some wedding if memory serves?
Eating the occasional treat is also a “good.” It’s okay to do something occasionally for no other reason than you enjoy it. You just have to remember moderation and proportion. The occasional scoop of ice cream is fine. Eating a bucket of it nightly and destroying your health is not.It’s not about if he’s right or not, if it’s good for you, why not do it? There will only be benefit. No one needs unhealthy food.