R
RebeccaJ
Guest
I agree, it does matter.This is wonderful. I have met and heard Bishop Hayashi several times, so I am very pleased he is a part of this liturgical event. It matters.
I agree, it does matter.This is wonderful. I have met and heard Bishop Hayashi several times, so I am very pleased he is a part of this liturgical event. It matters.
I know all of my other posts went unanswered, but I will try again.But you have no interest in Baptist/Orthadox/Anglican Tradition. And no where in this are Catholics getting out of their pews to talk to Baptist/Orthadox/Anglican in their pews. Rather this is all going down is some porcelain tower.
Iām sorry⦠Iām being testy⦠I just⦠this honestly has my guts tied in knots.
the horror Iām feeling right now).
P.S. I notice that there have been some posts here from Don Ruggero . IMHO his writings are superb.In the meantime, might I suggest this olā standard?
http://cdn.randomfunnypicture.com/pictures/605dutycallsvu3.png
It seems to come as a shock for some people that Jesus got it right the first time.Ecumenism for a lot of people means religious pluralism. More along the lines of Iām ok, youāre ok, or, itās all good!
Could be a shock to discover that is not what it means for the Catholic Church. Religious pluralism is a heresy, to Catholicism.
This attitude⦠Iām sorry, but I find it appalling. These are peopleās dearly held beliefs, part of of their souls, that you are so off-handly dismissing. You say that you want them to come back to Rome, but you have zero interest in them. I⦠is this true?I know all of my other posts went unanswered, but I will try again.
What do you mean by āinterest in ____ religionā?
Respect for, sure. What would a Catholic, a member of the church started by Jesus Christ himself and protected by the Holy Spirit, need to learn from anotherās man-made religion?
Some may say Protestant churches are more friendly, for example, but that is not something to* learn* about anotherās religion, it is not doctrine.
Oh so trueā¦In the meantime, might I suggest this olā standard?
http://cdn.randomfunnypicture.com/pictures/605dutycallsvu3.png
This coming from a Mormon? Thanks for the laugh, Jane!This attitude⦠Iām sorry, but I find it appalling. These are peopleās dearly held beliefs, part of of their souls, that you are so off-handly dismissing. You say that you want them to come back to Rome, but you have zero interest in them. I⦠is this true?
Yeah that too.It seems to come as a shock for some people that Jesus got it right the first time.
And that we, as Catholics, believe(d) him!
This makes me think you know nothing about Mormonism, and truly value other people little.This coming from a Mormon? Thanks for the laugh, Jane!
Letās seeā¦Iāve hung around Mormon friends for 27 years, I live in Utah, I had the missionaries over for multiple visits and even for dinner, I have the Book of Mormon on the desk next to my computer, Iāve engaged on hundreds of Mormon threads for several yearsā¦This makes me think you know nothing about Mormonism, and truly value other people little.
Do you believe in objective truth?This attitude⦠Iām sorry, but I find it appalling. These are peopleās dearly held beliefs, part of of their souls, that you are so off-handly dismissing. You say that you want them to come back to Rome, but you have zero interest in them. I⦠is this true?
Thank you.Oh so trueā¦
Every Mormon teenager I know begins their testimony with āI know the church is trueā.Do you believe in objective truth?
I ask because the Catholic Church teaches that there is objective truth.
The Catholic and Orthodox Churches teach that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist and that the bread and wine really and truly become His Body and Blood. The Catholic and Orthodox Churches teach that baptism is salvific and it really does wash away our sins.
Certain Protestants believe that the Eucharist is only symbolic and that Jesusā presence in the bread and wine is metaphoric. Certain Protestants also believe that baptism in and of itself is not salvific and only a sign of a personās faith in and commitment to Christ.
So who is right? They both cannot be correct.
Your protestations ring hollow in light of your own churchās history of splinter groups, some of whom have merged with or been reconciled with or otherwise absorbed into various other groups within the offshoots of and main branch of the Mormon church.This attitude⦠Iām sorry, but I find it appalling. These are peopleās dearly held beliefs, part of of their souls, that you are so off-handly dismissing. You say that you want them to come back to Rome, but you have zero interest in them. I⦠is this true?
Not to mention the Orthodox teach their church is the one true church. As do the Oriental Orthodox. As do the Assyrian Church. Not to mention other smaller faith groups that make the claim.Every Mormon teenager I know begins their testimony with āI know the church is trueā.
Obviously, Mormons are taught, and teach, that they are correct. The One True Church.
As the Missionary Pal likes to say, āeither the Catholics are right, or the Mormons are right. But we canāt both be rightā.
For some reason though, Jane has trouble with the Catholic Church doing it.Not to mention the Orthodox teach their church is the one true church. As do the Oriental Orthodox. As do the Assyrian Church. Not to mention other smaller faith groups that make the claim.
Thereās a lot of churches that make claims to being the one true church.
I would say it would be similar to Apostle Paul Palmieri working with all the other latter-day-saint groups to unite them under the true successor to Joseph Smith.I feel Iām missing part of the story here and/or misunderstanding things. Anyone care to help me out?
Do you represent the Brighamite latter-day-saint church? Can you speak for the whole Church?
- The whole methodology behind this mass proselytization, particularly the part where Catholics donāt get out of the pews to talk to Anglicans/Baptists/whatever.