Elections Supervisor Filmed Pulling Suitcases From Under Table is Mother(Rudy) and Daughter

[PaulinVA]

There is nothing here. This has been investigated and explained.

So. Just another conspiracy theory that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

However, the damage done here is that a number of people are vocally calling our election into question. There are no questions. They are just upset their guy lost and are making things up.

However, on the international stage we are looking like idiots. We try to export democracy across the globe, and it appears that we can’t do it properly here.

 

[gam197]

There is nothing here. This has been investigated and explained.

So. Just another conspiracy theory that doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.

However, the damage done here is that a number of people are vocally calling our election into question. There are no questions. They are just upset their guy lost and are making things up.

However, on the international stage we are looking like idiots. We try to export democracy across the globe, and it appears that we can’t do it properly here.

There are hundred of affidavits from regular citizens that state they saw irregularities so their word means nothing.

 

[PaulinVA]

There are hundred of affidavits from regular citizens that state they saw irregularities so their word means nothing.

According to the judges, yep. Not credible. "self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value.’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4d420a-3682-11eb-a997-1f4c53d2a747_story.html

Two of the biggest defeats took place in Arizona and Nevada, where judges tossed full-scale challenges to the states’ election results filed by the Republican Party and the Trump campaign, respectively. Both judges noted in their opinions that the plaintiffs did not prove their claims of fraud.

In a detailed, 35-page decision, Judge James T. Russell of the Nevada District Court in Carson City vetted each claim of fraud and wrongdoing made by the Trump campaign in the state and found that none was supported by convincing proof. The judge dismissed the challenge with prejudice, ruling that the campaign failed to offer any basis for annulling more than 1.3 million votes cast in the state’s presidential race.

…

The campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor in an amount equal to or greater than” Biden’s margin of victory, which was about 33,600 votes, Russell wrote.

During a court hearing Thursday afternoon, Trump campaign lawyer Jesse R. Binnall said the Nevada election had been “stolen” from Trump and claimed a “robust body of evidence” supported his conclusion.

Among its allegations, the campaign claimed that more than 61,000 people voted twice or from out-of-state.

In his ruling, Russell concurred with election officials and academic experts that there is no evidence for this, and specifically dismissed witness declarations that had been touted by the campaign, calling them “self-serving statements of little or no evidentiary value.”

The judge added that the campaign’s so-called expert testimony “was of little to no value,” and called a claim of ballot-stuffing in broad daylight — made by one anonymous person and not corroborated by anyone else — “not credible.”

 

[Victoria33]

There are hundred of affidavits from regular citizens that state they saw irregularities so their word means nothing.

Rudy answered something like, sure, what’s the exact number? Is it even into the thousands of affidavits and they are sworn under penalties of perjury. How about the critics?? They are not.

 

[PaulinVA]

Rudy answered something like, sure, what’s the exact number? Is it even into the thousands of affidavits and they are sworn under penalties of perjury. How about the critics?? They are not.

Victoria, read my response above.

I can write an affidavit that is “true”, in that I didn’t make it up. It still can have " little or no evidentiary value."

That’s where we are. Hundreds of affidavits that don’t say anything a court can use.

 

[ThinkingSapien]

With computer programs, they can tell when votes came in and for whom.

That in no way answers the questions I presented. You’ve shared a chart, but no information on interpreting the chart.

However, the damage done here is that a number of people are vocally calling our election into question. There are no questions. They are just upset their guy lost and are making things up.

There are now republicans that express feeling they should boycott elections. Trumpet has been telling them this. We have 1 month until Election Day on January 5, 2021.

 

[ThinkingSapien]

There are hundred of affidavits from regular citizens that state they saw irregularities so their word means nothing.

Are you referring to the affidavits expressing belief and conjecture for which the people that signed them don’t say that they have knowledge of any specific event? Or the one where someone’s sworn statement is that they think that their own math is correct?

I have concerns for the public if it is swayed simply by hearing that there is a large quantity of statements put in document form without actually caring what those documents look like. Not that this is the first time Trump has used paperwork as a political prop.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

 

[Dovekin]

@Victoria33 provided this yesterday, Lead Stories’ fact check of the video. A Republican Georgia official explained the process seen:

Election workers known as “cutters” because their job was to open absentee ballot envelopes and verify ballots for eventual scanning and counting were dismissed for the night sometime after 10 p.m. on November 3, 2020, because their work for the evening had been completed, he explained. Those workers who remained were responsible for conducting the scanning portion of the process, since ballots could not be left without being scanned overnight.

This tells us that Fulton County mail in ballots were prepared for counting up to 10:30. The actual counting of the ballots was done by a smaller number of people, probably limited by the number of tabulating machines they had.

We already know the Fulton County Mail in votes were hugely in Biden’s favor, so it should be no surprise that counting them produced a huge spike when they were counted (10:30-1:00 am).

 

[Victoria33]

Georgia officials warn judge of 'grave consequences' if they're not allowed to wipe, reset voting machines

Election officials in Georgia warned of “grave and serious consequences” if they are prevented from resetting voting machines in several counties.

A judge’s temporary restraining order to keep voting machines untouched in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee Counties is being challenged by election officials who contend that the machines need to be prepared for the upcoming Senate runoff elections in January. The officials have asked the court to lift the block so the Dominion Voting machines can be properly wiped and reset.

Machines needed for in-person voting are being prevented from having their memory cards cleared of data from the Nov. 3 election, according to the officials who requested the restraining order be lifted in a court filing on Thursday.

Whatever is happening there, to many of us, certainly looks fishy. It’s getting out-of-hand.

 

[ThinkingSapien]

Whatever is happening there, to many of us, certainly looks fishy. It’s getting out-of-hand.

No, in person early voting starts on the 14th. Given that the machines need to be prepared for an election that is only 9 days away, it is not “fishy” that they need the option of using the machines for another purpose.