End of the 60's is near

  • Thread starter Thread starter bones_IV
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does this mean we’ll return to the mindset that existed before the 60’s?

Things like,

Forced segregation.

Blacks can not vote

We accept what the government tells us, even if if means sending our kids off to be killed in needless wars.

All Protestants are going to hell.

Catholics not allowed to visit Protestant churches.

Women must keep their heads covered and their mouths shut.

Obey the priest, even when he’s abusing you,… after all, he’s a man of God.

Nuns can beat children at will.

Uhmm, no thanks.

Although the 60’s had some problems, it was from that time period that we ended up with the freedoms we have today. Freedoms that some of our fellow Americans did not share.
Freedoms that if you had to go without them, you’d be screaming!

Jim
 
Blacks can not vote
Are you saying that Church was racist prior to Vatican II?
We accept what the government tells us, even if if means sending our kids off to be killed in needless wars.
Straw man argument.
All Protestants are going to hell.
Church as never taught this.
Women must keep their heads covered and their mouths shut.
Read the letters of St. Paul.
Obey the priest, even when he’s abusing you,… after all, he’s a man of God.
I never said that priests were sinless.
Nuns can beat children at will.
Never said that.
Although the 60’s had some problems, it was from that time period that we ended up with the freedoms we have today. Freedoms that some of our fellow Americans did not share. Freedoms that if you had to go without them, you’d be screaming! Jim
Can’t say that was my mom and dad’s experiences. Stop posting falsehoods.
 
bones_IV
Are you saying that Church was racist prior to Vatican II?
Yes, racism existed in the Catholic Church, prior to the 60’s. Racism in our society was very much in place.
Straw man argument.
Really, does the 50,000 kids who died in Vietnam, for nothing, ring a bell?
Church as never taught this.
The Church taught that there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church. When I grew up in the 50’s and early 60’s, going to Catholic school, we were forbidden to step foot inside a protestant Church. Luckily my mother wasn’t as narrow minded, and ignored the priest and allowed me to join the cub scouts, even though it was held in the protestant church which was right next to our church. Other kids I went to Catholic School with, weren’t so lucky.
Read the letters of St. Paul.
You’re telling us the Church hasn’t read the letters of St. Paul?
I never said that priests were sinless.
No, but you seem to think the time before Vatican II was so much better than today.
Never said that.
But thats what life was like for many kids going to Catholic School, before Vatican II.
Can’t say that was my mom and dad’s experiences. Stop posting falsehoods.
Well I lived in that time period before Vatican II, and what I’m telling you is what myself and many Catholics experienced.
You weren’t born then, you wouldn’t know.

Don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t all bad. These were good times to be growing up as a kid for many of us. For others, such as African American kids, it wasn’t so good. Despite the faults, we did OK. However, there were some things that were not good, and with the Church in particular. Vatican II wasn’t called to destroy the Church, but to preserve it. I believe if not for Vatican II, the Church would be in bad shape today.

Jim
 
Does this mean we’ll return to the mindset that existed before the 60’s?

Things like,

Forced segregation.

Blacks can not vote

We accept what the government tells us, even if if means sending our kids off to be killed in needless wars.

All Protestants are going to hell.

Catholics not allowed to visit Protestant churches.

Women must keep their heads covered and their mouths shut.

Obey the priest, even when he’s abusing you,… after all, he’s a man of God.

Nuns can beat children at will.

Uhmm, no thanks.
It’s sad, Jim, that you assume this would mean moving backwards from the 60’s instead of forward.
Although the 60’s had some problems, it was from that time period that we ended up with the freedoms we have today. Freedoms that some of our fellow Americans did not share.
Freedoms that if you had to go without them, you’d be screaming!
It’s interesting that you glance over this point in favor of pointing up the “freedoms” gained. Including freedoms such as:

No Nativity on public land a CHRISTmas.
Public Vulgarity is tolerated, but Public Prayer is not.
No prayer in school - Not even silent prayer.
Nearly impossible to find decent, family programming on TV.
Poor Catachesis of our Children.
Legaized Abortion.
Rampant Pre-marital Sex.
Escalating divorce rates.
Plummeting vocations.

Yes - each age has it’s advances but none is a golden age. I think it is high time we tried to move past the rampant liberalism int an age of enlightened reason.

Peace
James
 
Great cartoon! 👍

Some things about the 60’s that I would like to see finally end: , rampant drugs, open marriage, no need for marriage, free sex, militant takeovers of the universities, breakdown of the American family, artificial contraception, abortion. Some people made advancements in their civil rights and that is good, but many more were killed and are being killed in the genocide of abortion.
 
Does this mean we’ll return to the mindset that existed before the 60’s?

Things like,

Forced segregation.

Blacks can not vote

We accept what the government tells us, even if if means sending our kids off to be killed in needless wars.

All Protestants are going to hell.

Catholics not allowed to visit Protestant churches.

Women must keep their heads covered and their mouths shut.

Obey the priest, even when he’s abusing you,… after all, he’s a man of God.

Nuns can beat children at will.

Uhmm, no thanks.

Although the 60’s had some problems, it was from that time period that we ended up with the freedoms we have today. Freedoms that some of our fellow Americans did not share.
Freedoms that if you had to go without them, you’d be screaming!

Jim
Jim, don’t you think you’re over-reacting a little bit?

I doubt that any of this was the intention of the cartoonist, and I’m rather surprised that anyone could see this as you did. Nobody is denying that great progress was made during the 60s in terms of human rights, but that seems to me to go without saying.

What the cartoon is trying to say is that Catholic worship, music, and some regard, theology, is still in San Fransisco in 1969, and although many positive things happened at that time, it was a time of crisis for the Church, something that I don’t need to tell you. It has been said thousands of times that those days shortly after Vatican 2 were days of chaos, misinterpretation, and a loss of Catholic identity, and the cartoon is implying that the Pope is trying to bring the Church into the 21st century by properly interpreting and implementing Vatican 2, and doing away with the negatives and taboos that existed in the 60s, and now must be done away with. Granted, the 40s were no picknic, that doesn’t mean that everything that came out the 60s was positive. Some challenges that exist today didn’t exist in the 40s or the 60s. There were more seminarians in 1962 than 1945, but from then on, vocations began declining, and the powers be on a Diocesan have no idea what to do about. They have to go out and try to spread the word about vocations, as the Early Christians did, rather than wait for young men to bang down their doors, which is what worked up until about 1970.

Now, Jim, I’ve read many of your posts, and I know that you, like the rest of us, would like to move forward to meet new challenges through re-gearing old traditions. This sort of browbeating doesn’t get us anywhere!
 
JRKH
It’s sad, Jim, that you assume this would mean moving backwards from the 60’s instead of forward.
The good O days were not necessarily all that good, if you actually look at them with the perspective that not everyone lived them.
It’s interesting that you glance over this point in favor of pointing up the “freedoms” gained. Including freedoms such as:
No Nativity on public land a CHRISTmas.
Don’t confuse political correctness for freedom, its not.

That being said however, in pre-Vatican II days, non-Christians could not worship as freely and open as they do today.
Heck, even Catholics were discriminated against. JFK had to explain his faith, to assure Americans that he would follow the Constitution and not the dictates of the Pope.
Public Vulgarity is tolerated, but Public Prayer is not.
Again, political correctness is not what freedom is about.
No prayer in school - Not even silent prayer.
If kids don’t pray before leaving their homes, the point is mute.

Besides, I can imagine the sort of protest from many in this forum, if kids were taught how to meditate at school.
Nearly impossible to find decent, family programming on TV
.

No its not. There are plenty of good family programs on TV.
Poor Catachesis of our Children.
Memorizing the Baltimore Catechism wasn’t good catechesis either. Kids that didn’t attend Catholic School, were more clueless about the faith than many kids are today. Back in pre-Vatican II days, the majority of Catholic families sent their kids to Catholic Schools, which were run by nuns. Their education in the faith was a far cry from the kids who merely went to CCD.
Legaized Abortion.
I didn’t say its a perfect world.
Rampant Pre-marital Sex.
Well at least boys aren’t taught that that they’ll go blind if they play with it, or girls will get pregnant, if you swim in a swimming pool with boys. 🙂

Also, girls who do get pregnant, aren’t sent off to homes to have their babies in secret, where they were forced to give them up for adoption, so they wouldn’t disgrace their parents.
Escalating divorce rates.
Back before Vatican II, women were often told by their priest, to offer the beating their husbands gave them as a sacrifice. It would be a mortal sin to leave their husband and it was scandalous.
Plummeting vocations.
Allowing married men, would fix this problem in 1 year.

Also, back in the pre-Vatican II days, families were told to give one son to the Church. As a result, many young men were litterally forced into the priesthood. The result was that they became angry, bad priest. Not all priest were good priest in those days. In fact, I think we had more bad priest in those days, than we do now.
Yes - each age has it’s advances but none is a golden age.
Agree, which is the point I’m actually trying to make to the OP’er.
I think it is high time we tried to move past the rampant liberalism int an age of enlightened reason.
We’re probably moving toward a time of totalitarianism, if history tells us anything.

Jim
 
Compared to today’s hard drug using; tattoo-crazy; Internet porn fiendish; body mutilation-minded society, the late 1960’s actually seems fairly innocent.
 
JRKH

The good O days were not necessarily all that good, if you actually look at them with the perspective that not everyone lived them.

Don’t confuse political correctness for freedom, its not.

That being said however, in pre-Vatican II days, non-Christians could not worship as freely and open as they do today.
Heck, even Catholics were discriminated against. JFK had to explain his faith, to assure Americans that he would follow the Constitution and not the dictates of the Pope.

Again, political correctness is not what freedom is about.

If kids don’t pray before leaving their homes, the point is mute.

Besides, I can imagine the sort of protest from many in this forum, if kids were taught how to meditate at school.

.

No its not. There are plenty of good family programs on TV.

Memorizing the Baltimore Catechism wasn’t good catechesis either. Kids that didn’t attend Catholic School, were more clueless about the faith than many kids are today. Back in pre-Vatican II days, the majority of Catholic families sent their kids to Catholic Schools, which were run by nuns. Their education in the faith was a far cry from the kids who merely went to CCD.

I didn’t say its a perfect world.

Well at least boys aren’t taught that that they’ll go blind if they play with it, or girls will get pregnant, if you swim in a swimming pool with boys. 🙂

Also, girls who do get pregnant, aren’t sent off to homes to have their babies in secret, where they were forced to give them up for adoption, so they wouldn’t disgrace their parents.

Back before Vatican II, women were often told by their priest, to offer the beating their husbands gave them as a sacrifice. It would be a mortal sin to leave their husband and it was scandalous.

Allowing married men, would fix this problem in 1 year.

Also, back in the pre-Vatican II days, families were told to give one son to the Church. As a result, many young men were litterally forced into the priesthood. The result was that they became angry, bad priest. Not all priest were good priest in those days. In fact, I think we had more bad priest in those days, than we do now.

Agree, which is the point I’m actually trying to make to the OP’er.

We’re probably moving toward a time of totalitarianism, if history tells us anything.

Jim
I must say, you make some very powerful points that seem so lost on so many…
 
Great cartoon. It is refreshing to see how the Holy Spirit is restoring many of the traditions of the Church that were disregarded by some in “the spirit of Vatican 2.” Pope Benedict XVI should be applauded for his cooperation with the Spirit, in this regard. Ironically, I predict that embracing these pre-Vatican 2 traditions will lead to a much greater religious devotion by young Catholics and (hopefully) many more vocations to the priesthood by traditional Catholic young men.
 
While yes, the post V-2 Church places more emphasis on social justice, How in the world was the plight of American minorities the fault of the pre-V-2 Catholic Church. As you point out, the Church itself was a minority harassed by the dominant culture.

It’s plain to most that the cartoon is a tribute to Benedict’s rebuke of the unrestrained liturgical innovation that happened post V-2 and the I’m okay, you’re okay malaise that enveloped so many.
 
bones_IV

Yes, racism existed in the Catholic Church, prior to the 60’s. Racism in our society was very much in place.
I never denied that racism existed in the Church.
Really, does the 50,000 kids who died in Vietnam, for nothing, ring a bell?
It’s called the principle of double effect.
The Church taught that there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church. When I grew up in the 50’s and early 60’s, going to Catholic school, we were forbidden to step foot inside a protestant Church. Luckily my mother wasn’t as narrow minded, and ignored the priest and allowed me to join the cub scouts, even though it was held in the protestant church which was right next to our church. Other kids I went to Catholic School with, weren’t so lucky.
No salvation outside the Church and the fact that a protestant can be saved are theologically the same thing.
No, but you seem to think the time before Vatican II was so much better than today.
I admit that many people just practiced Catholicism just out of custom. Vatican II intended to give us a kick in butt, and to practice what we preached.
But thats what life was like for many kids going to Catholic School, before Vatican II.
More of “I was a victim of that Old Authoritarian Church”.
Well I lived in that time period before Vatican II, and what I’m telling you is what myself and many Catholics experienced.
You weren’t born then, you wouldn’t know.
A sweeping generalization.
 
bones_IV
No salvation outside the Church and the fact that a protestant can be saved are theologically the same thing.
This is a change as a result of Vatican II. Prior to Vatican II, there was no salvation for those outside the “Catholic Church.” We were not even permitted to enter into a protestant Church, never mind attend one of their services…

Vatican II opened up our hearts and minds, to the true teachings of the Catholic Church. It opened our hearts to people who were not Catholic and non-Christians. It was a giant leap forward, for the Church.

Some as your cartoon suggest, want to revert to the days of Pre-Vatican II, where we shun anyone who is not Catholic. Do what we’re told and not question or understand the doctrines of the Church. Return to the days of a cold inhuman Church where everyone is a conformist.

Jim
 
Does this mean we’ll return to the mindset that existed before the 60’s?

Things like,

Forced segregation.

Blacks can not vote

We accept what the government tells us, even if if means sending our kids off to be killed in needless wars.

All Protestants are going to hell.

Catholics not allowed to visit Protestant churches.

Women must keep their heads covered and their mouths shut.

Obey the priest, even when he’s abusing you,… after all, he’s a man of God.

Nuns can beat children at will.

Uhmm, no thanks.

Although the 60’s had some problems, it was from that time period that we ended up with the freedoms we have today. Freedoms that some of our fellow Americans did not share.
Freedoms that if you had to go without them, you’d be screaming!

Jim
Jim, you’re either paranoid or you’re pretending to be so.

BTW, C.S. Lewis writes about needing to overcome his own “chronological snobbery” (our age is better than all preceding ages) on his journey to faith.
 
VociMike
Jim, you’re either paranoid or you’re pretending to be so.
I’m paranoid? Well, I’m not the who posted the thread, “the end of the 60’s” as if nothing good came from it.

I’m merely trying to enlighten the lad about the realities of the pre-60’s and pre-Vatican II.

Jim
 
This is a change as a result of Vatican II. Prior to Vatican II, there was no salvation for those outside the “Catholic Church.” We were not even permitted to enter into a protestant Church, never mind attend one of their services…

Vatican II opened up our hearts and minds, to the true teachings of the Catholic Church. It opened our hearts to people who were not Catholic and non-Christians. It was a giant leap forward, for the Church.

Some as your cartoon suggest, want to revert to the days of Pre-Vatican II, where we shun anyone who is not Catholic. Do what we’re told and not question or understand the doctrines of the Church. Return to the days of a cold inhuman Church where everyone is a conformist.

Jim
I suppose everyone reads a different interpretation into things.🤷 It’s actually an interesting thing about editorial cartoons.
Just for the record, I got no such meaning from this cartoon.

James
 
VociMike

I’m paranoid? Well, I’m not the who posted the thread, “the end of the 60’s” as if nothing good came from it.

I’m merely trying to enlighten the lad about the realities of the pre-60’s and pre-Vatican II.
You mean a reality that in your mind was only bad, as your list made quite clear. And that’s simply not the reality of the realities of the pre-60s and pre-Vatican II.
 
Vatican II opened up our hearts and minds, to the true teachings of the Catholic Church.
Jim
Hermeneutics of discontinuity risk leading to a fracture between the pre-Council and post-Council Church…there is a basic misunderstanding of the nature of a Council as such. In this way, it is considered as a sort of a constituent assembly, that eliminates an old consitution and creates a new one. But a constituent assembly needs a mandator and them a confirmation on the part of the mandator, that is the people that the constitution must serve. The Council Fathers did not have such a mandate and no one had ever given one to them; furthermore, no one could have done so, because the Church’s essential constitution comes from the Lord and has been given to us so that we can reach eternal life and, starting from this perspective, we are also able to illuminate life in time and time itself. …
The Church is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic both before and after the Council, throughout time. It "presses forward amid the persecutions of the world and the consolations of God, announcing the cross and death of the Lord until He comes (cf Lumen gentium, 8).Benedict XVI
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top