End Times Speculation XXIII (ver. 2.0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muzhik
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
DeepDeepTrouble3 said:
look up Pope Saint Paul VI, it shows his signature, which if you turn upside down, says 666.
Click to expand...
Any Pope with a P at the beginning of his name gets this effect. Also, he is not canonized, but beatified. If he was the Antichrist, would he have issued humanae vitae?

It was tragic and a great apostasy that so many Priests and religious left, but I don’t think that that leads to the conclusion that he was the Antichrist.
 
Well, we are still on the final Pope of the prophecy of St. Malachy, which is still a good and pious belief.
 
Last edited:
And your not right about all Popes signing their names with Ps having 2 ps in their name either. I p upside down is not a 6. Do it yourself. He has a peculiar way of signing his name. The mass exodus of priests and religious is a sign that he was the Antichrist. Popr Saint Paul VI, whom I consider saintly, also fulfilling the scriptural office of the antiChrist, by his changing the very essential forms of the sacraments, still saintly. After all, who can do the Antichrist better than a Pope? To me, it’s all a poem. Pope Saint Paul VI, pray for us.
 
I disagree. I think that no one else is worthy of being the Antichrist other than the Pope.
 
Last edited:
Antichrist is one man, so which Pope do you believe is the antichrist considering we are still waiting for him?
 
And this interpretation fits in with the secret of LaSalette.
 
There can’t be a greater Antichrist than a Pope. You think it’s going to be some little satanist from San Francisco. God wouldn’t give a satantist that much glory. It’s Pope Saint Paul the 6, the apparent (to modern controversy) “destroyer of the Church.”

Pope Saint Paul VI pray for us. See? It’s all a poem.
 
Last edited:
DeepDeepTrouble3 said:
There can’t be a greater Antichrist than a Pope. You think it’s going to be some little satanist from San Francisco. God wouldn’t give a satantist that much glory. It’s Pope Saint Paul the 6, the apparent (to modern controversy) “destroyer of the Church.”

Pope Saint Paul VI pray for us. See? It’s all a poem.
Click to expand...
I am not quite following your reasoning:
Are there two Pope Paul VI’s? The Antichrist and the Saint?
Or are you saying the Antichrist is also a Saint?
What is the poem?
 
I believe that is a sede lie that they push around online.
I don’t believe it has any actual source from the revelations of LA Salette.
 
I believe that the Antichrist is also the Saint. There are not two Paul VI’s. The Poem is told by God, and is not fully understood by me.
 
The Old Catholic Church suffered its own schismatic movements. It split largely along national lines, and led to the Independent Catholic movement, which tries to maintain a “Catholic” identity without the sin of Romanism. All the resultant churches that I’ve found and read about make some claim to apostolic succession while rejecting priestly celibacy, and embracing both women “priests” and gay and lesbian lifestyles as supported by G_D.

RE: the photos – to me they look like the same man 10 years apart, those 10 years being spent in the front lines of spiritual warfare.
 
I’d tend to agree on those pix. Sorta like the side by side pix of Star Wars emperor and pope that was floated a few years ago
 
Last edited:
DeepDeepTrouble3 said:
I believe that the Antichrist is also the Saint.
Click to expand...
Sir, that position is totally illogical. That is like saying “the incorruptible is now corrupt”. The Antichrist involves a total rejection of G_D and everything holy and united with G_D. Such an entity cannot also, at the same time, be a saint, someone totally subservient to the Will of G_D.

Or are you saying that “good is evil and evil is good”?

Check out this lesson by Archbishop Fulton Sheen on the Antichrist:

 
Just remember that if you had your adenoids removed as a kid, you will no longer be a paranoids.
 
As Patrick Coffin used to say on CAL, “Be a saint. What else is there?”
 
Okay, from what I have read in this thread, this is more a debate about Sedevacantism rather than Speculation of the End Times. I have personally been influenced by Sedevacantists and Over-Traditionalists when I was still new to the Church. To mistrust a Pope is one thing, but to claim that Pope to be invalid, or even worse, the Anti-Christ is borderline Luther-Like, as he depicted the Pope in his day as the Anti-Christ. I believe a Pope cannot be an Anti-Christ simply for the reason that one that is Holy cannot be unholy at the same time. Sure, there are Popes that are bad, or at least in our eyes, but we must understand that the Church has not been infiltrated by “Freemasons” and that the Church is the same. John Michael Talbot once said in one of his podcasts that there is the Left of the Church and the Right of the Church. They are like legs, interchanging every so often, but the essence of the Church, or the centre body, moves forward and stays the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top