T
tommiatkins
Guest
Where did she materalise from?
Enoch in chapter 4 of Genesis or the Enoch in chapter 5?Where did she materalise from?
I’m sorry, your statement is not correct. Catholics are required to believe that there was a first pair, but not in a literal interp of the creation story…that is, we can accept the mechanics of evolution, with the caveat that at some point God infused a rational soul into a first pair…Catholics believe all humans came from Adam & Eve to include Enoch’s wife (that is all Enochs)
I have never seen such a statement in acceptable Catholic print, could you cite a sourceTexas,
I’m sorry, your statement is not correct. Catholics are required to believe that there was a first pair, but not in a literal interp of the creation story…that is, we can accept the mechanics of evolution, with the caveat that at some point God infused a rational soul into a first pair…
Not exactly but possibly, as humans lived hundreds of years, remember Adam was 120 when Seth was born, there would be many generations present. At Adam’s death he probably had at least 120 descends and may be 200+. Cain, Abel, Seth did marry sisters. Enoch (generation 3)may have married a sister or cousin.So he had sexual relations with his blood sister?
If so it would not be wrong - it was God’s own command that they be fruitful and multiply, and if the only way they could obey Him was to procreate with their own sisters, well …So he had sexual relations with his blood sister?
Non-canonical, so …the daughter of Danel, the daughter of his father’s brother
So Adam at the time of his death,at 940 years, had only 200 decendents?
Leaving out the fact that it would be genetic suicide for a race to start from a pair, and that it would be incest, why is this just skipped over in the bible.
Possibly because it seemed a convenienet solution at the time the first scribes planned the story?
Only if the couple had defective genes. If they were perfect it would work fine - note the Hawaiian royal family which systematically weeded out all defectives.So Adam at the time of his death,at 940 years, had only 200 decendents?
Leaving out the fact that it would be genetic suicide for a race to start from a pair, and that it would be incest, why is this just skipped over in the bible.
Possibly because it seemed a convenienet solution at the time the first scribes planned the story?
Logically, Adam and Eve probably would have had perfect genes. They were created without sin, so they were not yet under judgment. Thus their physical bodies wouldn’t have likely carried the imperfections ours do now.Only if the couple had defective genes. If they were perfect it would work fine - note the Hawaiian royal family which systematically weeded out all defectives.
Defective mutations were part of the punishment for the fall.