Environmental Issues and the Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter fnr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The moon was full last night. You think that added to global warming?
There was a lunar eclipse two nights ago, a full moon last night, and this afternoon it rained here!!!

What do** you** think?😃
This morning at mass my pastor preached about homosexual marriage. I’m glad he did this rather than poll the congregation about whether the Eucharist was eco- friendly or not.
It helps to have perspective. Being over-scruplous is actually a sin, you know.
 
No, the Church does not ā€œhave toā€ be concerned about how it obtains wheat and wine. However, I am at a loss to understand why folks are so adamantly opposed to the idea that it may be appropriate or allowable to do so. It is not simply a consumer question, it is also a producer question.

In what way is it not reasonable to be concerned over the conditions in which the workers who pick and grow such crops work? Whether they are needlessly exposed to dangerous amounts of pesticides, paid a living wage, receive appropriate housing and treatment?

The Catholic Migrant Farmworker Network seems concerned
cmfn.org/issues.html
*Pesticides *
The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 300,000 farmworkers suffer acute pesticide poisoning each year.
I think what is opposed is using the Eucharist as a political tool. These are all prudential issues. I am against spoiling the environment and mistreatimg workers. I simply disagree with the OP’s point.
 
Think about it this way, if there were a 1/10 chance that something you did would harm someone else, would you try to reduce the chances of that harm, or the magnitude of the harm? What if it was a 1/5 chance? 1/100? 1/1000? What level of confidence are you comfortable with?
I ask again why drive a car? Even under perfect conditions you may kill someone.
 
I think what is opposed is using the Eucharist as a political tool. These are all prudential issues. I am against spoiling the environment and mistreatimg workers. I simply disagree with the OP’s point.
You disagree that it’s worth talking about it? That’s all I was saying.

I definitely am not trying to use the Eucharist politically. In fact, I think going through the Church takes it out of politics. For me, it’s a matter of personal ethics. Am I unintentionally hurting other people? If I become aware of it can I honestly ignore it and say I have a clean conscience? This has nothing to do with you, fix, or with anyone else. I have no basis for judging anyone but myself, whose actions I have influence over.
 
You disagree that it’s worth talking about it? That’s all I was saying.

I definitely am not trying to use the Eucharist politically. In fact, I think going through the Church takes it out of politics. For me, it’s a matter of personal ethics. Am I unintentionally hurting other people? If I become aware of it can I honestly ignore it and say I have a clean conscience? This has nothing to do with you, fix, or with anyone else. I have no basis for judging anyone but myself, whose actions I have influence over.
If you really think you cannot receive communion in good conscience if you think the way it was obtained was not eco friendly I suggest you speak with your pastor about being overly scrupulous.
 
I ask again why drive a car? Even under perfect conditions you may kill someone.
How about this:
I drive a car to feed my family, deliver them to the grocery store, school, and church. There’s a 1/10,000 chance every day that I might kill someone using my car, but there’s probably a 90% chance that I would hurt my family by NOT driving a car. In terms of the insurance industry, or of a casino, my ā€œactuarially fairā€ expectation of harm to someone else as a result of my harming them is given:
Expected Harm = (probability of harm) * (magnitude of harm)

The insurance industry example might say that I’ve got a 1/10,000 chance of injuring someone every time I drive, with an average cost of $1000 per injury. So my insurance company charges me $0.1 ($1000 * 1/10,000) per trip I take. The insurance company estimates that I take 2 trips per day (to and from work). In a month my ā€œexpected damagesā€ that the insurance company would have to cover is $0.1 * 2 trips/day * 30 days = $6. They figure the chance that their costs might be more than $1000 per injury, and adjust my rates that way. They also estimate the chance that I might kill someone and the average liability payout that the insurance company would have to cover, the chance of damaging my car and its repair cost, and that adds up to my insurance bill, after the company tacks on a few percent profit on top of that.

So, I drive because I’m pretty sure I’d hurt my family by not driving. I address the risk I pose to others by paying an insurance company to pay the damages I impose on others, in case I do have an accident, and they charge me (hopefully) a fair market price to do so.

You could go through the same exercise for how much of an impact pesticides used in wheat and grape production have on people. Odds are that it’s very small, but I think it’s responsible to think of it.

Just so everyone else knows, even though I’m the OP here, I’m not a Dominican (Order of Preachers)!
 
If you really think you cannot receive communion in good conscience if you think the way it was obtained was not eco friendly I suggest you speak with your pastor about being overly scrupulous.
I’m not saying that I’ve committed a sin per se, only that the possibility is there, and it’s a relatively small possibilty for any one person. What about the scruples of a billion Catholics, in aggregate?
 
I’m not saying that I’ve committed a sin per se, only that the possibility is there, and it’s a relatively small possibilty for any one person. What about the scruples of a billion Catholics, in aggregate?
The billions of Catholics in aggregate don’t see this as an issue all. Hence my recommendation that you talk to you pastor about being overly scrupulous
 
The billions of Catholics in aggregate don’t see this as an issue all. Hence my recommendation that you talk to you pastor about being overly scrupulous
I suppose you’d be against the suggestion that we substitute organically grown coffee from collectives in Ecuador for communion wine, too, eh?šŸ˜›
 
I am not sure I see the generational thing, necessarily, but then I don’t know the ages of the other posters. I’m 44.
.
I have spent some time in Europe and specifically Germany. I was very impressed with how eco friendly Germany is. When I went to buy batteries I had to turn in my used batteries for recycle. I was so impressed by the backyard gardens there, even industrial buildings have garden boxes on their windows that would be the envy of Nurseryland. The refrigerators in HOMES were the size of a camp or hotel refrigerator here. People ride their bikes to the train station, there were literally hundreds of bicycles in front of the train stations. The bikes all had metal baskets on the back. I found their use when I went to the market as they don’t ask ā€œpaper or plasticā€ since everyone brought their own basket to put their groceries for the day in. They bought only enough for the day, hence the small refrigerator.

When I returned to the US I couldn’t help but notice how extremely wasteful we are and how we hoard natural resources in contrast to Europeans.

Germany is where our Holy Father is from. It is no surprise then that he is environmentally conscious.
 
I have spent some time in Europe and specifically Germany. I was very impressed with how eco friendly Germany is. When I went to buy batteries I had to turn in my used batteries for recycle. I was so impressed by the backyard gardens there, even industrial buildings have garden boxes on their windows that would be the envy of Nurseryland. The refrigerators in HOMES were the size of a camp or hotel refrigerator here. People ride their bikes to the train station, there were literally hundreds of bicycles in front of the train stations. The bikes all had metal baskets on the back. I found their use when I went to the market as they don’t ask ā€œpaper or plasticā€ since everyone brought their own basket to put their groceries for the day in. They bought only enough for the day, hence the small refrigerator.

When I returned to the US I couldn’t help but notice how extremely wasteful we are and how we hoard natural resources in contrast to Europeans.

Germany is where our Holy Father is from. It is no surprise then that he is environmentally conscious.
And France is almost 80% nuclear, while the US, which invented nuclear power, is only 17%. And who’s keeping us from replacing our old coal-burning plants with nuclear plants?
 
Eco-friendly hosts would be consecrated to pagan nature deities.
Pagan nature deities, like the ones worshiped by the Franciscan Secular Order, an official order within the Catholic Church?

From their Rule, Chapter 2, Part 18:
Moreover they should respect all creatures, animate and inanimate, which ā€œbear the imprint of the Most High,ā€ and they should strive to move from the temptation of exploiting creation to the Franciscan concept of universal kinship.

I have been asked too many times already whether I sin due to excessive scruples. I do not appreciate being called a pagan. Your pride makes you blind. My heart is consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
 
Pagan nature deities, like the ones worshiped by the Franciscan Secular Order, an official order within the Catholic Church?

From their Rule, Chapter 2, Part 18:
Moreover they should respect all creatures, animate and inanimate, which ā€œbear the imprint of the Most High,ā€ and they should strive to move from the temptation of exploiting creation to the Franciscan concept of universal kinship.

I have been asked too many times already whether I sin due to excessive scruples. I do not appreciate being called a pagan. Your pride makes you blind. My heart is consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
I guess i missed the part about eco-friendly hosts. Could you highlight it for us? Thanks!
 
Our celebration of the Mass arose during a time when human-environment interactions generally led to the environment was a hostile force. Christ going into the wilderness, for example.

The environment has always been known to be hostile as well as benevolent.

However, in modern times, humans relate to the environment in ways different from previously, and it still affects us in profound ways.

As Catholics who view the Eucharist as the center of our sacramental life, I think it’s time to consider some of the implications of environmental issues on the global celebration of the Eucharist, and vice-versa.

Well,the celebration of the Eucharist certainly has the effect of inner and outer peace,communion with God and fellow worshippers,and benevolence toward mankind.

Here are a few examples for consideration:

(1) Soil desertification. For wheat and grapes to grow, they need fertile soil. Desertification is a process that robs land of its ability to sustain traditional crops. One might view desertification as a threat to the celebration of Mass in areas hard-hit by desertification, either directly (e.g., being unable to cultivate crops) or indirectly (e.g., by increasing the price of bread and wine through scarcity.

That’s the fault of the land,not of the Eucharist.

(2) Pesticides. Bread and wine are produced from two plants that have undergone large-scale conversion to the use of pesticides. The bread and wine have been converted into using drugs? Well,as long as they revert to Catholicism and are cleansed of their impurities,it’s alright.

Pesticides are associated with both benefits (e.g. greater agricultural productivity) and costs (e.g. developmental delays in developing children). As part of our celebration, shouldn’t we think more about the means by which the bread and wine are produced?

No,let’s leave that to the producers.

(3) Others, including air pollution from long-range transport.

Think of it as holy smoke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top