EPA now going after icemakers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monte_RCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Monte_RCMS

Guest
lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=611260

Global-warming zealots to ban ice makers

The Washington Times, by Staff

Original Article

washingtontimes.com/news/2011/apr/23/global-warming-zealots-to-ban-ice-makers/

Posted 4/25/2011 5:05:25 AM

Ice makers are the latest target in the left’s ongoing war against the conveniences of modern life. Earlier this month, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued a report that may condemn this essential household item to the contraband list that already includes functional light bulbs, toilets, washing machines and showerheads.

Comments and Replies:

Global warmists believe life is a zero-sum game where what other people do harms them, and hence, they have every right to tyrannize everyone else. It’s moments like these that make me grateful that we are all mere mortals. Imagine what these people would be like if they lived forever.

Another Federal agency that needs to be cut in half, reviewed next year, then cut in half again.

Really? I know a LOT of people who are going to be very unhappy about that. Maybe when we live in mud huts with no electricity and running water the zealots will be happy.

If one has poor eyesight, impaired depth perception, Parkinson’s or other condition causing problems with accurate and/or rock-steady placement of items, then an ice maker becomes an invaluable aid in providing material for an ice pack and relief on a hot day without spilling water all over the fridge and floor. Just two little things but important to those thus in need of a little help. It’s worth the approximately $3 per month.

How many ice makers does it take to equal a trip to Cancun so people can yak about global warming?

If an average refrigerator lasts 10 years, then that $37 works out to 1 cent a day savings. And the 2 Billion extra to make an inferior fridge works out to how many units per year, I’d bet a net increase of at least $1000 per unit. I’ll pay my penny a day for my ice maker and water in the door!!!
 
Sometimes people make arguments that are so bad that they do the OTHER side a better favor than their own. Such is the case with the editorial linked here.

I tend to agree that banning incandescent light bulbs is a stupid and premature idea. Ditto to any proposal to ban ice makers.

But let’s face facts here. There are plenty of fully functional 1.6 gallon flush toilets (though some early makers surely made poor ones). My newish house has 1.6ers and they plug less often than the old dinosaurs in my previous house. My showerhead is compliant and works great. My Energy Star front loading washing machine works FAR better than the old top loading water hog AND fits more clothes per load to boot. Even bringing these things up weakens his argument instead of strengthening it.

But focusing on fridge icemakers IS stupid. My old fashioned top freezer unit (with icemaker, but no dispenser) is FAR more efficient than the typical side by side units. If energy efficiency is the goal, why not focus on inefficient fridge styles before eliminating function? I predict this goes nowhere.
 
No Federal or State Agency should be allowed to make or change rules. This practice has to stop, because it amounts to law making.

Anything that effects the lives of Americans should be left up to “ELECTED” Representatives.

(Obama has placed all Faith Based Initiatives under the EPA.)
 
Oh Great. Just like Europe. No ice.

Obama promised.

God Bless you.
+Jesus, I Trust In You!
Love, Dawn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top