Episcopalian vs. Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter beegirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We’ve been down this road plenty of times. It’s like a dog chasing its tail. I’m out.
It’s repetitive becuase you refuse to engage the argument. You just keep saying it is true and then citing “Some parish somewhere” as evidence. That there are loopy Episcopalians is beyond doubt. That paganism is normative for Episcopalians has yet to be proved by you. One more time: if you do not want me to use Notre Dame University as normative of the Catholic Church, why should you take “Some parish in Los Angeles” as normative for TEC?
I never said YOU as an individual are a hedonistic, evil, horrible man who is not serving Christ in your own way. Again, words in my mouth. I have no doubt you are probably a better man than I. And I have said as much in previous posts. You choose to ignore that.
Yet you say the Episcopal Church does, and I am an Episcopalian.
Wow, now who’s being uncharitable…?
Let’s just say that your lack of charity for TEC has hardly inclined me to be charitable to your sect. Yet what I said it really small beans to you calling mine pagan.
And yes, the TEC is pro-abortion
Got any evidence for that? Oh, unless we campaign against it with all our vigor, we are for it? Whatever.

Zach
 
Since it’s become clear we have a Royal Rumble of Episcopalians vs. the lone gunman here, I’ll sign off. This is not fruitful at all. I will close with a few remarks.

If you read my post, know me at all, bother to get to know me, you’ll see that I have been very bold at criticizing my own Church, especially on matters of sexual abuse, homosexual clergy, and the cover-ups I feel have gone on. I have taken a lot of hits from my own fellow churchmen for it. And I know an Episcopalian in this forum who was thinking of becoming Catholic recently. I IM’d him, got to know him, and my advice after getting to know him is that he should stay Episcopalian for a while, study deeply and get to the know the Catholic Church, and make sure it’s right for him. I’m not an apologetics maniac trying to seek and destroy and convert. I’ve said the same thing to personal friends.

I was an Episcopalian for seven years. I have been to Episcopalian parishes, got to know the church quite well. I’m not a yahoo who just read a few David Virtue posts and jumped off the deep end of the pool.

My former rector (and the parish is now ACNA anglican no longer TEC by the way) and I have locked horns about homosexuality. I have personally argued with him that it’s easy for him to attack gays during sermons and yet openly condoning divorces and remarriages of couples sometimes two and three times. I think a person commiting pre-marital sex is morally as sinful as gay sex. I think an adulterer is as sinful as an active gay man or woman. It is easy to paint me out to get all gays and being a one-trick pony. I have more depth than that. In fact, I know that homosexuals struggle with themselves greatly. I would say to a gay Catholic that we DO want you in our Church. And sometimes a gay man might fall and have a gay encounter. Is he doomed? Of course not. He needs to admit he sinned, go to reconciliation, and repent, live anew. And if he falls again, make use of this sublime sacrament and dust himself off, stand up spiritually alive again. I’m not a gay-basher or hater. I condemn the lifestyle, not the man. I condemn the behavior of an adulterer or promiscuous teen just as much as an active lesbian. I know these people struggle, need God’s mercy and should be loved. HOWEVER, where I differ with liberal Episcopalians is that none of these sins should be condoned, nurtured, allowed to blossom, and be told that these sins are normal for those people. They are not told to struggle, repent, confess, and fight the good fight. They’re told to give in, it’s ok, it’s normal, live and let live. In fact, God wants it that way. I disagree.

My rector didn’t like me saying to him that I think his sermon blasting gays was unfair because he just got through making excuses for divorce. Jesus actually went out of His way to condemn divorce, not homosexuals per se. So it’s hypocritical to some degree. Gays are a soft, easy target.

I’ve been blasted when I criticize the coverups in the Church, what I see as cheesy liberation theology in places like the Diocese of Los Angeles, and I’ve been ripped to shreads at times when I say that the Vatican has covered this stuff up as well.

I have defended my Orthodox friends in CAF when I felt they were being unfairly accused of silliness and when I felt my fellow Catholics were warping history or taking something out of context. I have defended my Anglican friends when the goofy Henry VIII divorce smears come toward them or when they talk about how Anglican orders are null and void. I don’t happen to think Anglican orders are worthless and void.

I have gotten some people hot when I said I don’t like Sarah Palin. I’ve gotten some mad when I said that health care needs an overhaul. I’ve gotten flack when I’ve said I think Republicans and Democrats are equally vile at this point in history and I deplore Tea Party stuff as much as this Move On.org mumbo jumbo. I try to call it like I see it, stick up for what I think is right, and I’m not a smear master. You boys think what you like. I know who I am, God knows as well. I’m not playing the victim, I’m just telling you who I am. May God bless you all.
 
Yeah, whatever. Do you honestly, seriously think you’ve been the poster boy for charity as well? Come on…the problem with TEC is the only thing that IS normative at this point in their history is LAWSUITS. That’s the one constant norm. I pray for bishops like Mark Lawrence to bring sanity back to your sect. Your community is really hurting morally.
It’s repetitive becuase you refuse to engage the argument. You just keep saying it is true and then citing “Some parish somewhere” as evidence. That there are loopy Episcopalians is beyond doubt. That paganism is normative for Episcopalians has yet to be proved by you. One more time: if you do not want me to use Notre Dame University as normative of the Catholic Church, why should you take “Some parish in Los Angeles” as normative for TEC?

Yet you say the Episcopal Church does, and I am an Episcopalian.

I love it! The Catholic Church is a SECT! See your loaded language! Ha! Oh man, hilarious classic liberal arguments. Loaded language up the wazoo. And then you say, “well I can insult you because my insult was a bit smaller than yours!” LOL…classic stuff man…and if you’re the more mature spiritually developed guy you claim you are then why are you telling me you return uncharitable behavior with more uncharitable behavior? Tit for tat and eye for an eye. I guess you’re as nasty and vile as I am…welcome to the cestpool!
Let’s just say that your lack of charity for TEC has hardly inclined me to be charitable to your sect. Yet what I said it really small beans to you calling mine pagan.

**The official position of TEC is pro-choice. **
Got any evidence for that? Oh, unless we campaign against it with all our vigor, we are for it? Whatever.

Zach
 
Gurney, if you will scroll up a bit, you would see that I granted that you weren’t anti-Episcopalian and just said that you kinda came across as such. Of course, it was all my fault for feeling that you were. Go figure.

Howzabout we both just drop this persecution complex altogether? I really, really repent citing anti-Episcopalianism if I sounded like you do right now.

Zach
 
So your olive branch to me is basically, “hey, if I’m as big a creep as you are, sheesh man, I’ve really lowered myself and apologize.” An insult wrapped in a gesture of reconciliation. Wowzers…Dropping the whole thing sounds grand. I’m outa here…Howzabout it! 🙂

Gurney, if you will scroll up a bit, you would see that I granted that you weren’t anti-Episcopalian and just said that you kinda came across as such. Of course, it was all my fault for feeling that you were. Go figure.

Howzabout we both just drop this persecution complex altogether? I really, really repent citing anti-Episcopalianism if I sounded like you do right now.

Zach
 
Pretty much. What’s more, I will comment that your innocent flouncing off routine is impeccible. Ah, the internet.

Zach
 
Well Yggdrasil, why don’t we just deep six the whole Bible. That’d be easier than anything. Just call it all fables and mythology a la Zeus and Odin. No pesky morality, authority, or dilemnas. Who gave you the authority and knowledge to discern these Scriptures better than the Fathers, Saints, Bishops, Popes, and great doctors of the Church? I didn’t say that I glean God’s loathing of homosexuality all from Sodom and Gomorrah. Let’s just have a free for all and call the whole thing off, right? What parts will you keep and follow? The easy parts? The parts that don’t challenge our sensibilities? The parts that Oprah, the Media, the LGBT community, Ellen, and the Rainbow Coalition sanction? How do you pick and choose? You keep challenging me, how about you?
My response to all of your questions here is: I don’t know. Personally, I have a lot of doubts about Scripture. Your faith is a lot stronger than mine; kyrie eleison.

I appreciate that you want to be done with this, and God bless you. For my part, I was merely curious as to why you’d take Exodus literally vs. Jonah metaphorically. Has the Church indeed mandated precise Old Testament passages for literal reading? I was just wondering, in my own way, if you were perhaps “picking and choosing” as well.
You can believe God changes, morphs, and makes morals relative. I don’t.
I don’t believe that God changes. Morals, however, are a different beast. Were not the moral teachings that God dispensed to the ancient Hebrews (e.g., stoning as a punishment for adultery) provisional?

The morals of the Jewry prior to the coming of Christ and His Revelation were relative to the fact that the covenant had not yet been fulfilled. The law was a pedagogue, according to St. Paul, to convict us of sin. The Mosaic Law was apparently temporary—God’s way of illustrating to mankind the necessity of grace.
 
Well I’m glad you and Katharine have had nice exchanges and that you’re a fan. I’m not. I detest her greatly. And by the way, how did you ascertain that I’ve never attended an Episcopal Church? You might be suprised, my friend.
First of all, I never said I was a fan, I said I asked some questions to get answers rather than go to a website. There you go putting words in MY mouth;). I also have no idea whether you’ve been to an Episcopal church, but I’m pretty sure you’ve never been to mine which you seem to want to cover with the same sweeping statements as all others. Yes, this is a Catholic Forum and I fully came here expecting to learn and share, not really be repeatedly attacked. Funny thing about starting a thread about Episcopalians—some actually show up. Who did you expect to talk about differences?
 
You’re absolutely correct, Matt. I already knew that. But my point is that someone who does not intellectually assent to the teachings of the Church can be baptized all they want but it does them no good to be Catholic if they deny major tenants of the faith, right? I’m not wanting you to hit the bricks, trust me. I am not trying or wanting to give you the boot…I mean that. I’m simply saying that if someone agrees more with Orthodoxy and yet he’s a baptized Presbyterian, he should convert to Orthodoxy. If a person is Anglican but does not believe in apostolic succession and wants a more confessional faith, he should go Lutheran. If a person says, 'I believe in mostof the Catholic Church but I think women should be priests, gays should marry, abortion should be legal, etc. etc. then they should go where they feel that truth exists. From what I see, the Episcopal Church is more analogous to your beliefs than Catholicism. If you say, ‘I’m not comfortable with the Pope’s teachings on abortion, gay marriage etc. but I’m going to obey and struggle and pray to be in line with this sacred teaching and be obedient, pray to understand and obey,’ then you should stay Catholic.

I’m less a heathen than these Episcopal friends of ours in here think me to be. My best friend was feeling pressure from his wife, also Episcopalian at the time, to become Catholic. She really really really wanted him to convert. I told him that God loves Him and knows his heart. He would make a fabulous Christian wherever he went. My friend was very much in line with Catholic moral teaching but felt uncomfortable with Marian dogma, infallibility, etc. I told him to stay put, relax, pray. God loves him, period. After a time he and his wife did indeed become Catholic. They’re better Catholics than yours truly.

My favorite people, by and large, in CAF are Orthodox or Catholic. Go look at my friends on here. I have no hatred for individual Episcopalians despite what Zach and the gang believe. I disagree deeply with the theology of the church, don’t condemn each individual member to perdition’s flames. God bless you, too!
Gurney, I’m not sure I would say does them no good. The Sacraments of Reconciliation and Anointing are always there if they desire. And your examples are nice and everything. But even if I were to ever go the TEC route, as I understand it I would be excommunicated but would still be a Catholic anyway, permanently bound.
 
First of all, I never said I was a fan, I said I asked some questions to get answers rather than go to a website. There you go putting words in MY mouth;). I also have no idea whether you’ve been to an Episcopal church, but I’m pretty sure you’ve never been to mine which you seem to want to cover with the same sweeping statements as all others. Yes, this is a Catholic Forum and I fully came here expecting to learn and share, not really be repeatedly attacked. Funny thing about starting a thread about Episcopalians—some actually show up. Who did you expect to talk about differences?
It’s a Catholic forum but it’s even the non Catholic section too. 👍
 
Well, he has continued to make unfair and unsubstantiated generalizations about the Episcopal Church, and when he had been caught in his game by arguing with contrary experiences, clarifications of TEC’s structure, and arguments from his own premises, he starts decrying how everyone is out to get him. It’s all great is some way, but not the way you are acting.

Zach
 
Well, he has continued to make unfair and unsubstantiated generalizations about the Episcopal Church, and when he had been caught in his game by arguing with contrary experiences, clarifications of TEC’s structure, and arguments from his own premises, he starts decrying how everyone is out to get him. It’s all great is some way, but not the way you are acting.

Zach
And when it was convienient for you, you twisted what he said, and tried to put words in his mouth.

You’re really good at pointing out how people are not acting appropriately, but fail to see it in yourself. Maybe you should try it sometime.

I also find it interesting that when you cannot successfully argue what he is saying, you attack him instead.
 
He’s complained of that a whole lot, but I really haven’t. Indeed, when I quoted his very own words he just starting complaining that Episcopalians were out to get him.

Zach
 
He’s complained of that a whole lot, but I really haven’t. Indeed, when I quoted his very own words he just starting complaining that Episcopalians were out to get him.

Zach
Good try, but …WRONG!!

Look at your post #172, where you call him an anti (personal attack). His response of being ganged up on didn’t come until post #211.

See how that works!?!
 
Face it, Gurney is much better at getting his point across, without having to resort to such tactics.

Go get em Gurney!!
 
Such statements really just back up the point. What use is this conversation?
 
I am sorry, Dharma. Deep inside I believe with the deepest faith that ignorance can be overcome with persistence and reason. Despite how very many times the internet has proven me wrong over the years. Or maybe I’m just a glutton for punishment. Whichever.

Zach
 
Given the tone that this thread has taken it’s understandable for everyone to be in defense mode. My hope is that some can understand that we’re all brothers in Christ’s church and will approach each other in love. Maybe I’m a glutton, too.:)🙂

God bless you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top