I
Isaiah45_9
Guest
Daniel is probably referring to:What are you talking about?![]()
A Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope - Treatise Compiled by the Theologians Assembled at Smalcald - 1537.
Articles 39-42…
Daniel is probably referring to:What are you talking about?![]()
I would say being a Lutheran is a narrow road - in that the Gospel is preached so thoroughly that we don’t have many excuses. That God seems to grant us steadfastness in our hearts is a cause for rejoicing.We do believe that the average Roman Catholic congregational member has a better chance of going to heaven than the papacy for instance.
Oh. Wow!Sorry to have missed this:
I certainly do believe the Holy Spirit continues to guide the Catholic Church, in addition to my church. It’s evident the Holy Sprit has touched the leadership of your Church, and for that I give thanks, and I pray that guidance you have received becomes evident in the next conclave to select your next Pope.
We pray for the church in our intentions - that of course includes our church as well yours and our other separated brothers in Christ.
If we Lutheran say we have more evidence of Holy Sprit working in our church, perhaps we shouldn’t gloat, for that may only mean that there’s more to correct.Oh. Wow!I think you and JonNC are the only two friends of mine that are willing to admit that the Holy Spirit continues to guide the Catholic Church. How about - into all truth, as per John 16:13? Or am I pushing my luck…LOL…
![]()
That all seems reasonable.If we Lutheran say we have more evidence of Holy Sprit working in our church, perhaps we shouldn’t gloat, for that may only mean that there’s more to correct.
In seriousness though, I don’t have to deny to love that God has for your church in order to claim that my church is guided by his love as well. To say that the Holy Sprit is not upon all of, would be to deny grace itself.
I’m not sure if Lutherans quite require perfection in how we view the validity of the church. If so, by recognizing that the church will stumble from time to time, we can recognize that it’s not God that is stumbling but ourselves.
How about this: I don’t think the Catholic Church has the singular and unique charism of infallibility, but I pray that God leads us all to the Church that does, and of course, Catholics would be a part of that church.
Here’s where Lutheran theology differs in a subtle way - we say we can’t know the full truth about the Eucharist, in that it’s a mystery.That all seems reasonable.The only question that bothered me as a former Lutheran, was: how can I know the full truth about the Eucharist.
I don’t think we disagree with Catholics in that the Eucharist is the true body and true blood of Christ. We know this because Jesus told us: “This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.” That so many Christians get this wrong despite scripture and tradition means we have our work cut out for us!If no one church possesses the singular and unique charism of infallibility, thanks to God, then how can I know which church is teaching correctly about the Eucharist?
Hey Ben. Quick question before I catch some shut-eye: In order for a sacrifice to be valid e.g. the old testament, blood was required. If in fact the Eucharist, upon the words of consecration, becomes Jesus’ blood, (something you and I believe) offered up to the Father, (just as the animal’s blood was offered up in the OT) shouldn’t it be safe to refer to the Eucharist as a sacrifice of Jesus’ Blood? Of course you and I agree with the whole once-and-for-all thing…Here’s where Lutheran theology differs in a subtle way - we say we can’t know the full truth about the Eucharist, in that it’s a mystery.
I don’t think we disagree with Catholics in that the Eucharist is the true body and true blood of Christ. We know this because Jesus told us: “This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.” That so many Christians get this wrong despite scripture and tradition means we have our work cut out for us!
Thank you for posting Daniel. Your beliefs are closer to what I mostly hear from Lutherans in my area.One Church of many congregations within the same Church, Lutherans would explain that for some doctrines the means of grace is difficult to obtain, because the doctrine won’t promote a growing faith. We generally don’t go so far as to definitively say non-Lutherans can’t go to heaven, and we don’t believe Lutheranism is the only path. We do believe that the average Roman Catholic congregational member has a better chance of going to heaven than the papacy for instance.
Who is “the church?”I appologise for my writings if they indicate that - I don’t have any judgement in the matter at all. I try to do as the church tells me to do,
It seems it would depend on whether the Church had already settled the matter, which leads back to my first question.While discussing theology, we have room for conjecture and error.
Do you think God is unknowable?But in our practice as Christians, we are given the truth and should be thankful for it. Even our desire for the truth is God given.
Perhaps my posts should have a disclaimer that I’m more than likely to be wrong.
Yes, but this site moderator has already sent me a private message, directing me not to comment further on the topic. This topic apparently violates the terms and conditions of this site as “Contempt for Catholicism” as established by CAF.Daniel is probably referring to:
A Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope - Treatise Compiled by the Theologians Assembled at Smalcald - 1537.
Articles 39-42…
The church I attend to receive the sacraments, hear the gospel, and play out my small contributing role.Who is “the church?”
God reveals himself in his Son Jesus Christ. Stubborn fool that I am, If I receive Him, and know a portion of God’s will, it is by God’s Grace. If I think I have the ability to know Him, that is also by God’s Grace.Do you think God is unknowable?
I think Lutheran theology is that Christ died once on the cross, so we would say that the Eucharist is a re-presentation of that sacrifice, the first presentation being at the Last Supper.Hey Ben. Quick question before I catch some shut-eye: In order for a sacrifice to be valid e.g. the old testament, blood was required. If in fact the Eucharist, upon the words of consecration, becomes Jesus’ blood, (something you and I believe) offered up to the Father, (just as the animal’s blood was offered up in the OT) shouldn’t it be safe to refer to the Eucharist as a sacrifice of Jesus’ Blood? Of course you and I agree with the whole once-and-for-all thing…![]()
For a Lutheran to be anti-Catholic would be a contradiction of their own faith. Especially in simple terms where “catholic” from Greek is simply universal, as in an universal acceptance of Christ Jesus as our Savior.Thank you for posting Daniel. Your beliefs are closer to what I mostly hear from Lutherans in my area.
Many are extremely anti Catholic Church and believe that the Lutheran Church is the Church Christ instituted on earth. They believe that Catholic Church is so corrupt and lost the Holy Spirit’s direction many years back. They are completely against the Chair of Peter.
Consubstantiation is the theological term for the Eucharist in Lutheranism and is officially denounced by the Roman Catholic Church. Lutherans believe in the literal presence of God in the elements of bread and wine; and believe that it’s the true body and blood of Christ. We also see the Sacraments of the Altar as a renewal of our confirmation of Baptism. We also partake of both body and blood together; and don’t take just bread alone, with an option of taking the blood.Hey Ben. Quick question before I catch some shut-eye: In order for a sacrifice to be valid e.g. the old testament, blood was required. If in fact the Eucharist, upon the words of consecration, becomes Jesus’ blood, (something you and I believe) offered up to the Father, (just as the animal’s blood was offered up in the OT) shouldn’t it be safe to refer to the Eucharist as a sacrifice of Jesus’ Blood? Of course you and I agree with the whole once-and-for-all thing…![]()
Not quite, though I can certainly understand the confusion… We reject Consubstantiation and Impanation: Here’s how we define them, and C.F.W. Walther’s rejection of them for our Synod.Consubstantiation is the theological term for the Eucharist in Lutheranism
That is one point that I would have to agree with you on, Lutherans, that I know, say that it is the Bible, the Gospel, that is important. Well, I believe that and I know that and I also know that it is the Word of God-Jesus is the WORD, made flesh. BUT, that doesn’t mean the same to Lutherans as it does to us, does it? Lutherans, that I know, seem to believe the Bible came before the Catholic Church. Whereas, we Catholics know that we compiled the writings into a Book that we refer to as the Holy Bible. The Word of God.We never had to repudiate it, for we never believed it. Luther wrote an amazing volume of work and combined with that, and poor translations and out of context quotes you can make the man say anything.
And even if he did say it, it doesn’t matter, for Luther was but a man who pointed to the Gospel. It’s the Gospel that’s important…
**The law is without mercy for our sins and only Enoch and Elijah were directly taken into heaven under the law, and Abraham nearly gave-up the blood line to Hagar the Egyptian, and Moses shattered the Law given to him against the ground. The Law of God requires a level of perfection that could only be met through atonement from Christ Jesus, so yes our inability to comply with the Law is death, and I believe that to be Scriptural. Those of faith live-out life under the law, but bound to faith in the mercy of Christ Jesus. **Actually, this is not a Scriptural position.
For some, yes but the nature of salvation by grace through faith has never changed. There are those who were saved by it who lived under the law.
This is an interesting piece of non-biblical advice.
Daniel,Consubstantiation is the theological term for the Eucharist in Lutheranism and is officially denounced by the Roman Catholic Church. Lutherans believe in the literal presence of God in the elements of bread and wine; and believe that it’s the true body and blood of Christ. We also see the Sacraments of the Altar as a renewal of our confirmation of Baptism. We also partake of both body and blood together; and don’t take just bread alone, with an option of taking the blood.
Transubstantiation is the theological term for the Eucharist in the Roman Catholic Church.