Eternity: How does God know what we didn't do yet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcoPG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How there could be any foreknowledge if she could do otherwise?

That I agree. But the question is whether foreknowledge could be subject to change once it is known with an agent with free will.
Because God and his Foreknowlegde do not decide. It seems repetitive, what i say, but you can do otherwise, since foreknowledge in eternity sees whatever you will do, in advance, all at one present moment, but you will do what you will do. I mean you cannot do otherwise once you did what you did.
 
You seem to keep forgetting that God is outside time. God’s foreknowledge is also outside time. It is not subject to change. God cannot be surprised by our decisions. If he were, that would be process theology via Alfred North Whitehead.
How about prophecy? We can ask a prophet about foreknowledge, can’t we?
 
How about prophecy? We can ask a prophet about foreknowledge, can’t we?
I don’t think prophets get asked. They ask God. God reveals what he will, but his revelations concern events God knows will occur, not just because God has willed them (as in the case of sending a Messiah), but also events we have willed (as in the crucifixion of Jesus).
 
Future is fixed if and only we don’t know the future. Suppose that God tell you that you will do X at time T which means that future is fixed through prophecy. Could you do otherwise? Yes, then future is not fixed. No, you have no free will.
The future is NOT fixed by God. Simply knowing the future does not fix the future. I can know what happened/happens/will happen 5 minutes into a movie, it doesn’t mean I fixed the movie simply because I know it. I know what everyone says/said/will say in every scene in a movie, doesn’t mean I made them say it. I just saw the movie already and that’s how I know. Same thing with God. Yes I could do otherwise, but I **won’t **because I already didn’t. Not because I couldn’t. **God is always already in the future. **
It is fixed since God knows it. You are free to act upon since you don’t know it.
It’s NOT fixed, it’s just known. You can know something without fixing something. Knowing it doesn’t make it fixed, it just makes it seen. God is already in the future right now.
That is correct. But suppose that you are told that you are going to do X tomorrow. Could you do the opposite?
Yes I could do the opposite. I could always do the opposite. But I won’t do the opposite, not because I can’t but because I already didn’t. It’s not a matter of can I, it’s a matter of **will **I.
 
How there could be any foreknowledge if she could do otherwise?

That I agree. But the question is whether foreknowledge could be subject to change once it is known with an agent with free will.
Because no matter which she chooses, the choice is already in the future and can be seen by God who is in the future. Yes it can be subject to change, the change is still what is seen in the future. No matter how many times you change your mind on which color to paint your room, your ultimate decision is already in the future. You can change your mind or your choice as much as you want but whichever you choose already exists in the future.
 
The future is NOT fixed by God. Simply knowing the future does not fix the future. I can know what happened/happens/will happen 5 minutes into a movie, it doesn’t mean I fixed the movie simply because I know it. I know what everyone says/said/will say in every scene in a movie, doesn’t mean I made them say it. I just saw the movie already and that’s how I know. Same thing with God. Yes I could do otherwise, but I **won’t **because I already didn’t. Not because I couldn’t. **God is always already in the future. **
I didn’t say that God fixed future. Those who can fix future are agents with free will but regardless we have one future which depends on our decisions and it is fixed and that is how that God can know it.
It’s NOT fixed, it’s just known. You can know something without fixing something. Knowing it doesn’t make it fixed, it just makes it seen. God is already in the future right now.
Future is fixed.
Yes I could do the opposite. I could always do the opposite. But I won’t do the opposite, not because I can’t but because I already didn’t. It’s not a matter of can I, it’s a matter of **will **I.
You didn’t get the point. You have to first recognize that future is fixed and only God could know about it unless there is God intervention through the prophecy. Once the knowledge of future action is in the place we could do otherwise which means that future which is Gods foreknowledge is subject to the change hence God cannot be changeless.
 
Because no matter which she chooses, the choice is already in the future and can be seen by God who is in the future. Yes it can be subject to change, the change is still what is seen in the future. No matter how many times you change your mind on which color to paint your room, your ultimate decision is already in the future. You can change your mind or your choice as much as you want but whichever you choose already exists in the future.
How many future could we have?
 
Future is fixed.

Bahman, can you please explain this to us? I think we could say it is fixed, but we don’t agree who fixed it, how and why (and dare I say “when”?).
 
How many future could we have?
My opinion is we have one, and so many that we possibly can, as long as we didn’t decide what to do at one moment, which will fix the future.
That God sees this “after” before we do it is no contradiction to me.
 
Future is fixed.

Bahman, can you please explain this to us? I think we could say it is fixed, but we don’t agree who fixed it, how and why (and dare I say “when”?).
Who fix the future? God and us.
How? God through sustaining the creation, so called law of nature, which is deterministic. And us through our decision which is not deterministic.
Why? At least within Catholic framework, creation needs God. We need decision to move on.
When? God does in at any instant. We do it when decision is involved, practically all the time.
 
My opinion is we have one, and so many that we possibly can, as long as we didn’t decide what to do at one moment, which will fix the future.
That God sees this “after” before we do it is no contradiction to me.
That is correct until a prophet intervene and tell us what we are going to do in future. Future is not fixed then since it is biased by foreknowledge. And that is when we see the contradiction since future cannot be subject to change since otherwise God’s foreknowledge is subject to change hence changeless God. In another hand the person who has foreknowledge can do otherwise.
 
Who fix the future? God and us.
How? God through sustaining the creation, so called law of nature, which is deterministic. And us through our decision which is not deterministic.
Why? At least within Catholic framework, creation needs God. We need decision to move on.
When? God does in at any instant. We do it when decision is involved, practically all the time.
For the WHY and WHEN : yes and that’s precisely the difference between Eternity and HIstory, and one think may create contrast, friction, paradox, but it doesn’t mean it’s a contradiction.

The two first points: WHO if God fixed the future, do you think we have free-will?
HOW : sustaining Creation really needs determination, or laws can have their effects and us, having the power to discover them, can use them as much as we can and as much as it is permitted to us? After all, for Christians, God gave us the Earth, to use and protect it. Laws are there yes, but how is it deterministic. It is regular and steady.
 
God through sustaining the creation, so called law of nature, which is deterministic. And us through our decision which is not deterministic.
This is one place your logic falls apart. You cannot make a claim based upon the empirical observation of the consistency or regularity of the laws of nature that the physical universe is deterministic. That is a metaphysical claim that requires insight into the mechanisms behind the laws of nature to know with certainty that the laws of nature are grounded in some deterministic reality. That insight is presumed by you, not demonstrated.

In fact, if God, as Actus Purus, is behind the laws of nature, then omnipotence beyond all constraints (ultimate Freedom) is the foundation for the laws of nature. This means that it is not determinism, but quite the opposite of determinism (omnibenevolence) that is at play directing creation. Determinism has no room for mercy at a moral level. God is merciful, hence, determinism cannot be true.
 
For the WHY and WHEN : yes and that’s precisely the difference between Eternity and HIstory, and may create contrast, friction, paradox, but it doesn’t mean it’s a contradiction.

The two first points: WHO if God fixed the future, do you think we have free-will?
HOW : sustaining Creation really needs determination, or laws can have their effects and us, having the power to discover them, can use them as much as we can and as much as it is permitted to us? After all, for Christians, God gave us the Earth, to use and protect it. Laws are there yes, but how is it deterministic. It is regular and steady.
 
Hello,
I would like to find some explanation about this: Since God knows everything that can be known in Eternity, he knows what we will do with our will before we do it in time or History.

Is there an easy way 😛 to explain how history is a part of Eternity, perhaps with the two views, that is God’s view of Eternity and Man’s view of History? I can more or less concieve some image of it, but i would like to understand with arguments.

I would think of a sort of circular diagram, but it is not really exact since Eternity is not a cycle, and History has an end. So how do you understand and explain it ? thank you very much.
I suppose one way to visualise it would be to draw a large circle, and then a much small circle within it. The much smaller circle is our history, whereas the much larger (preferably infinitely larger) circle is God’s history or eternity. He can look down on both, just as we for example can look down at a map representing a map. He can not only survey our history, but remember His own, before, during and after the creation of our universe and the spiritual world.

With a map spread out in front of me, I can look at the USA, then skim back to Australia, glance over to Russia, pick out London, or check out anything else that takes my fancy.
God can do something similar to the universe and history.
 
The two first points: WHO if God fixed the future, do you think we have free-will?
We are very sure about two things: 1) We experience hence there exist a objectivity and a subjectivity, in simple word what is experienced and the experience, or physical state and mind state. In simple word we could be affected. 2) We also experience that there is a relation between our mind states and physical states. In simple word we could affect.

Whether our decision is solely based on consciousness is subject of debate.
HOW : sustaining Creation really needs determination, or laws can have their effects and us, having the power to discover them, can use them as much as we can and as much as it is permitted to us? After all, for Christians, God gave us the Earth, to use and protect it. Laws are there yes, but how is it deterministic. It is regular and steady.
It has to be deterministic in order to be livable. How? We don’t really know.
 
This is one place your logic falls apart. You cannot make a claim based upon the empirical observation of the consistency or regularity of the laws of nature that the physical universe is deterministic. That is a metaphysical claim that requires insight into the mechanisms behind the laws of nature to know with certainty that the laws of nature are grounded in some deterministic reality. That insight is presumed by you, not demonstrated.
That is correct. One cannot claim that the law of physics which is result of observation of regularity in physical world correctly represents the law of nature, namely what is underneath.
In fact, if God, as Actus Purus, is behind the laws of nature, then omnipotence beyond all constraints (ultimate Freedom) is the foundation for the laws of nature. This means that it is not determinism, but quite the opposite of determinism (omnibenevolence) that is at play directing creation. Determinism has no room for mercy at a moral level. God is merciful, hence, determinism cannot be true.
This I have problem with: First the nature of God could be malevolence, please read the previous comment. Second, I don’t see how determinism is related to malevolence.
 
In our view of God, determinism is malevolence since God loves us so much to give us free-will; to dertermine things would give us no choice.
 
In our view of God, determinism is malevolence since God loves us so much to give us free-will; to dertermine things would give us no choice.
Determinism as a substrate for living is very fair in my high opinion. The state of affair a living being cannot possibly be determined.
 
Determinism as a substrate for living is very fair in my high opinion. The state of affair a living being cannot possibly be determined.
How would the world be, without determinism, for you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top