L
LittleFlower
Guest
There aren’t “ideas” there is an objective, medical truth.
We know where the Church’s definition lies. It’s a terrible way of defining it, mostly because we know it’s inaccurate. And the woman’s body naturally “kills” most fertilized eggs (pretty horrible, right? That’s part of the problem with the definition as well).It is important to draw a distinction which I suppose is where the Church’s use of “abortion” comes into play, since it is still killing.
Motrin can block implantation. And most fertilized eggs don’t even implant.blocking conception is different from blocking implantation.
Yes it is. You aren’t having sex when you are most fertile. That is contraceptive. Your mind and soul aren’t open to having children.No it’s not a contraceptive there is nothing preventing implantation and nothing blocking the sperm from the vagina.
contraception, noun
the deliberate prevention of conception or impregnation by any of various drugs, techniques, or devices; birth control.
Pray tell, what does not fornicating have to do with contraception? We are talking about married couples here. Don’t change the goalposts to suit your argument.So I am abstaining until marriage are you going to tell me that’s contracepting too?
That is contraception. If you are married, and you avoid having sex during your most fertile days you are not open to life.Abstaining in general because of not wanting to get pregnant. It’s not being, not open to life because you choose not to have sex.
Nope, it is contraception. It’s included in the definition of contraception as a technique.I’m not arguing with you. It’s not contraception. It’s natural to abstain when it’s not a good time to get pregnant. It’s call being responsible, knowing that sex leads to babies and abstaining when it’s not a good time to have another child.
That’s contraceptive.abstain during that same time when you don’t want to get pregnant.
This may well be why you appear confused in this area of valid Church medical ethical statements and are confusing others.I’ve not refuted nor attempted to refute any of this, not once. Though this statement “the issue is not primarily the medical reality but what one perceives to be the reality when one chooses to swallow the pill” doesn’t make much sense to me.