Eucharistic miracles DNA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Struggling1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What’s even worse is I let these questions and issues inspire doubt and I don’t want to but my mind wraps around these questions and struggles with them.
 
Yes, I understand.
I can get very sad and doubtful, even when I intellectually and by clear ideas know God is.

Even when their arguments are terrible, like your friend saying the Vatican just faked it. Completely ignores the history of the miracles.

It can get tiring having to respond to every little thing, I know. But we have the saints in heaven, our Lord, the blessed virgin, and the angels as friends, or should I say, family. Prayer can get important in this world.
 
Last edited:
I’m doubling down on prayer keeping up with my nightly rosary it’s just difficult I have to also accept it’s a journey and that it won’t happen overnight.
 
I understand your concern about the question, but I just don’t think one less or one more proof would do any diference.
exempli gratia I saw a miracle when I was a teenager but I remained as agnostic as I was before, It took me more 7 years to convert, for other reasons that had nothing to do with that event.
 
True and I greatly appreciate your response I meant no animosity!
 
I would be very interested in a DNA test tbh.

There’s always a part of me that wonders if these miracles actually happened or not (e.g. Did those scientists actually run the tests and were they the actual results?)

But at the same time, I believe it’s really God with or without these miracles. I think even if a DNA test is to be conducted…people who don’t want to believe will assert the point I mentioned (that the scientists were basically full of BS)
 
I will, my friend!
May God bless you and always comfort your soul!
Sancta Mater Dei, ora pro nobis!

In Corde Jesu,

Your brother in Christ
 
I have such a hard time with the argument of miracles aren’t meant to help faith. Or the Vatican won’t run a dna test cause it eliminates the potential for belief since if we know it all matches we know God is at play and we will worship out of fear and not love. It just seems like such an easy out argument to describe things much along the lines of when people say God didn’t answer their prayers directly but instead they scramble to explain how no is also an answer. Why must no always be the answer why can’t just once I personally have the witness of what I need?
 
An atheist friend proposed this as one of the biggest refutation if Eucharistic miracles saying the only reason it hasn’t been done is the Vatican made these miracles. It’s utterly asinine in my opinion but to be honest I don’t how to refute these claims.
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. Then I supposed the Vatican could go on to forge the DNA evidence as well!
See how it doesn’t really make sense?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top