M
Mannyfit75
Guest
It is. Most of it is AT’s opinion which are not binding at all.No, it’s called AT’s opinion.![]()
![]()
It is. Most of it is AT’s opinion which are not binding at all.No, it’s called AT’s opinion.![]()
![]()
But you must admit, most of it are popular opinion. Artificial Contraception, Gay sex tolerance, limited Abortion, Islamaphobia, Evolution, etc. Very popular opinions.It is. Most of it is AT’s opinion which are not binding at all.
From the words of the Great Pope John II:But you must admit, most of it are popular opinion. Artificial Contraception, Gay sex tolerance, limited Abortion, Islamaphobia, Evolution, etc. Very popular opinions.
My view on Euthanasia though is still a minority opinion.![]()
problem is, there is no objective evidence which suggests that church teachings are much more than human opinions themselves. thats why even catholics are fast becoming secular. that limited abortion is legal even in italy. and many catholics ignore church’s extremistic ban on non nfp contraception. etc, etc.The truth of moral teaching of the Church is immutable my friend. It cannot change. Human opinions can.
wait a sec. let me show you why this assertion is untrue.Secularly speaking, its only murder if its against the law. Thank God thats changing. I would like to seek aid too in ending my suffering in the case I become hopelessly ill and being tortured by pain.![]()
Well, the essential moral teaching of the Church has remain unchanged. For example the Early Church have always oppose abortion. The Didache forbid Christians from committing abortion, and the Early Church Fathers attest to this as well.problem is, there is no objective evidence which suggests that church teachings are much more than human opinions themselves.
thats why even catholics are fast becoming secular. that limited abortion is legal even in italy.
And the Pope and Vatican condemned the Italian government for legalizing abortion. That is pretty clear. I know for a fact that the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit. God does not change his mind. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Therefore, my brethren, don’t carry any strange doctrine.oh well.![]()
In that event, i dont think it was an issue of defining ‘murder’. Rather it was an issue of defining ‘human’. Jews were dehumanized. so killing them was like killing dangerous animals.according to this logic, the deportation and deaths of the jews and others in the holocaust during world war II wouldn’t qualify as murder because the nazi state said it wasn’t. you don’t want to endorse that point of view do you?
but for some reason everyone seems to agree on the core ideas of ‘murder’. like this coming from webster…if murder is only murder when it is defined as such by the state, then presumably every country could define it differently and the idea of murder would soon become meaningless.
:newidea: That’s kinda the whole point about the objection to euthanasia; taking a human life dehumanizes it.Jews were dehumanized. so killing them was like killing dangerous animals.
I must admit, thats the best reasoning ive heard against euthanasia. hmmm…:newidea: That’s kinda the whole point about the objection to euthanasia; taking a human life dehumanizes it.
i suppose that’s the difference between secular morality and theistic morality. in the former you only want to avoid harming or offending other people; in the latter you also want to avoid offending God (in this case by unlawful taking of the life of one of His creatures).but for some reason everyone seems to agree on the core ideas of ‘murder’. like this coming from webster…
the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought
euthanisia are done with a charitable heart, not with malice. and in some countries, its not a crime.
Then I implore you to carefully consider how and where you “seek aid… in ending… suffering” lest you trade some temporary torture for permanent suffering by separation.Secularly speaking, its only murder if its against the law. Thank God thats changing. I would like to seek aid too in ending my suffering in the case I become hopelessly ill and being tortured by pain.![]()
Same here, I want to see AT in heaven when I pass from this life to the next.Then I implore you to carefully consider how and where you “seek aid… in ending… suffering” lest you trade some temporary torture for permanent suffering by separation.
I want to see you in heaven.
Your’e not wishing that AT leave this life before you do, right?Same here, I want to see AT in heaven when I pass from this life to the next.
suppose you were the one suffering and you WANTED to die but no end was in site and the pain you were suffering was unbearable (no medication helped, prayer didn’t ease any pain) no one wanted to help you - What then?Suppose you were the one suffering and didn’t want to die, and your love want put an order to cut off your life support, and you can’t speak for yourself because you are vegetated state what then?
You lean on Jesus, who suffered so much more intensely in His passion than any of us could possibly do.suppose you were the one suffering and you WANTED to die but no end was in site and the pain you were suffering was unbearable (no medication helped, prayer didn’t ease any pain) no one wanted to help you - What then?
morphine?…no medication helped…
Morphine works. And if it doesn’t, you up the dosage till it does work. That is not euthanasia, it is medication.suppose you were the one suffering and you WANTED to die but no end was in site and the pain you were suffering was unbearable (no medication helped, prayer didn’t ease any pain) no one wanted to help you - What then?