I think that most Evangelicals don’t go to church to pray but to listen to the ministers extempore prayers and not to pray themselves. The individual members have no chance to say a word since the mega-churches are strictly non liturgical.
The thing I don’t like about megas is the worship tends to have a showbiz aspect,
rock bands, skits, is about all thier “worship” amounts
Another objection I have is that the megas seek to bring the world to the church instead of the other way around.
But for many of us, the “showbiz” aspect “feels” worshipful because it’s what we grew up with and what we are used to. For many of us, the liturgical aspect “feels” ritualistic and mechanical and even rather pagan.
I’ve gotten used to it now after seven years, and I do find liturgy-based worship comforting and solid. But there’s seldom any feeling or emotion.
And that’s OK, since I don’t have to “feel” Jesus to experience His True Presence. Being a Christian is faith-based, not feeling based.
But I’ll admit that I do love the “showbiz” aspect of evangelical worship. For me, this is heaven!–a well-timed “program” with well-rehearsed music and excellent speaking from the pulpit. I may be Catholic, but I’m not going to lie and say that I enjoy wimpy songs sung by only a few people in the congregation, and a pallid homily voiced by a priest who sounds like he has a sinus infection and doesn’t bother to say anything that people don’t already know.
My daughter, a professional stage manager, made the statement once (she is Catholic BTW, a convert like her mom and dad) that “Most Catholic churches could use a good stage manager.”
I agree with her.
Just because a church is liturgical doesn’t mean that everything must be dull, slow, and quiet. I realize that to some people, “reverence” means “quiet.” But to me, it means exuberance, joy, laughter, and singing from the gut. Reverence means giving God what is due. And I think He’s due more than silence and stone-faces.