Ever get a "tired of liberal Church" M.Angelica moment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scriabin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
twiztedseraph:
I dare say youre correct. However, just add “constant teaching of the Magisterium” to the Holy Father, but then again, you had Sacred Tradition down 😃
I just realized late last night I forgot Oral Tradition but I did include the teachings of the Holy Father.
 
mary bobo:
Interesting discussion. As a recent revert I a struggling with some of what I see. I was raised pre-Vatican II, and the new liturgy does not seem as reverant to me. The Mass seems more like services in a protestant church and it is strange to me. But I love the church, I never disbelieved her teachings even when I was away and I just wish things were a little more traditional than they seem to be. It seems there is different interpretation of the church’s rules and regs, for want of a better word, depending on where you go, traditional church, “progressive” church, etc. I am not knocking it—I just don’t understand it.
I was there for years since I also was a revert. I am bouncing now because of the things going on in the Church today. But after listening to Father Ricardo’s talk on the Mass this morning I have a better attitude. I totally understand, because its like how can I condemn something I love so much. Look for the beauty in the gospel and the consecration no matter what Church you have to attend. I am having a tough time because I used to have an excuse to drive all the way to St. Cyril and Methodius but now that my daughter is here with the grandchildren I know longer can drive to meet her to give her the kids. So I have been searching as well. But luckily I can listen on my computer to Father Ricardo and have some great cd’s of Father Basil Nortz and Father Coropi and tapes of Father Maciel Marcial these wonderful priests keep me balanced. The Church is much different than those earlier years.
The postive is that we are active Catholic’s now proclaiming God’s word to everyone with the different lay movements in the Church. Look into some of those lay orders and some how you may find the good of Vatican II as I did. I think I love most the fact that I learned that God wasn’t this great big being ready to hit me in the head everytime I did something wrong. A relationship of a Father and a child is more encouraged. To love Christ because you want to not because you have to.
 
40.png
m134e5:
Bl. Teresa of Calcutta was most certainly “on fire for the faith”- yet she stood for communion, and received in the hand (where the practice was allowed).
Not so sure about this…

"Not very long ago I said Mass and preached for …Mother Teresa of Calcutta, and after breakfast we spent quite a long time talking in a little room. Suddenly, I found myself asking her – don’t know why – ‘Mother, what do you think is the worst problem in the world today?’ …“Without pausing a second she said, ‘Wherever I go in the whole world, the thing that makes me the saddest is watching people receive Communion in the hand.’”

geocities.com/peterpaulmin/CommunionInTheHand.html
 
40.png
Confiteor:
Not so sure about this…

"Not very long ago I said Mass and preached for …Mother Teresa of Calcutta, and after breakfast we spent quite a long time talking in a little room. Suddenly, I found myself asking her – don’t know why – ‘Mother, what do you think is the worst problem in the world today?’ …“Without pausing a second she said, ‘Wherever I go in the whole world, the thing that makes me the saddest is watching people receive Communion in the hand.’”

geocities.com/peterpaulmin/CommunionInTheHand.html
Your claim is BOGUS. I hate how people pass on this urban legend garbage.

How about an official website? Geocities? You gotta be kidding!
 
40.png
AltarMan:
Your claim is BOGUS. I hate how people pass on this urban legend garbage.

How about an official website? Geocities? You gotta be kidding!
By all means, then, present your proof that it is not correct. For now, I understand that it is correct based on what I’ve read:

catholic-pages.com/mass/inhand.asp

udallasnews.com/media/paper743/news/2004/11/10/Commentary/Communion.In.The.Hand.The.Tradition.Speaks-802450.shtml?norewrite&sourcedomain=www.udallasnews.com

fatima.org/crusader/cr30/cr30pg2b.asp

unitypublishing.com/liturgy/cv_on_comm.html
 
Crusader, and all your other IDs you have had banned, TONE DOWN YOUR RHETORIC. I do not know what is wrong with you, but you certainly do not know how to debate in a sane manner. You seem to like to trash people, and frankly, with your trashing of Bp. Bruskewitz, I have had it. With your constant trashing of traditional Catholics, Catholics who do not dissent from the dogmas and doctrines of the church, I have had it. You have had 3 or 4 previous IDs banned Crusader, does that not teach you anything?
40.png
AltarMan:
Both extremes in the Church suck.

In their minds they couldn’t be more different, yet in reality they can be quite similiar. Both can be quite heterodox and welcoming of liturgical abuses and delicts:

Heterodox Group Alpha. Often referred to as “liberals”, “Spirit of Vatican II’ers.” Fond of referring to themselves as “progressives.” Common traits: Appreciate porous ceramic chalices and liturgical dancing. Mantra: “the spirit of Vatican II” Idealistic spritual advisor: Roger Cardinal Mahony.

Heterodox Group Beta Often referred to as “right-wing whack-jobs” and sometimes as “preeners.” Fond of referring to themselves as “traditionalists.” Common traits: they know better than the Church what is best; more Catholic than the Pope. Mantra: It’s not abusive if it’s “better” than what the Church actually directs. Idealistic spritual advisor: Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz.
 
40.png
twiztedseraph:
Its funny how the Desert Fathers saw what Satan looked like, burned, ugly and no knees. Infact, the dear Card Ratzinger once said, if you can’t kneel to God you are sick…He explores the notion of kneeling for the Eucharist in his “Spirit of the Liturgy”.

The need to kneel for communion is one of example. Showing others the true reverence with which one should receive one’s creator, in a world where people pop Jesus into their mouth as if he was but a cookie…Maybe one day, when the schools start enforcing pre-Communion confession, when Johnny “I’m a Pagan” isn’t allowed into the communion line, when drops of the Precious blood don’t stain the carpet because of carelessness, mayhaps then we kneelers will no longer have to kneel…But even then, it would be a devotion safeguarded by the Apostolic See.

The Vatican safeguards the right to kneel, communion may not be denied to one who kneels licitly.

Finally, what is your idea of “orthodox”? Did you realise sir, that Vatican II actually states that Latin be safeguarded, as the language of the Church? I love my brothers and sisters in the Church, left, right, middle all of you:D However the middle guys annoy me slightly more than the lefties. Atleast with the lefties you know what they’re gonna say. The middle guys however have this kind of work it out as you go feel. They’re neither hot nor cold…so to speak. A middle guy will one minute teach orthodox doctrine, and then the next be playing hard down rock music in the sacrifice of the Mass. Despite the fact that the treatise of how we pray is how we believe, and that rock music is pretty darn secular…

Maybe you shouldn’t so openly criticize people’s faith which is in the end the opinion of a mere acolyte. Or atleast term it so its not so offensive to anyone who reads. Especially since you’re stereotyping what YOU think is orthodox.
Just follow the Church, not your own ego. It blows me away that the “preeners” believe they can disregard the Church when it comes to posture of receiving Holy Communion (we are instructed to stand/bow in the Latin Rite in the USA), yet are arrogant enough to judge the “liberals.”
 
Oh its very interesting. Could you provide me more information ?
 
40.png
AltarMan:
I’m honestly not sure why it troubles you so that this statement about communion in the hand is attributed to Mother Teresa. I would also like to know if it is incorrect. But it doesn’t seem to have been disproved, and it is a quote from Fr. Rutler’s Good Friday homily in 1989. I understand it is available on the St. Agnes Cassettes. Fr. Rutler is still active at another parish in NYC and is well known for his Good Friday homilies; he also appears on EWTN. He has been associated with the Missionaries of Charities for some time as a retreat master and has published at least 14 books. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I see no reason to doubt it. (That doesn’t mean that communion in the hand isn’t permitted; we know that it is.)

In any event, there is no need to be a cyber bully about it.
 
40.png
twiztedseraph:
Finally, what is your idea of “orthodox”? Did you realise sir, that Vatican II actually states that Latin be safeguarded, as the language of the Church? I love my brothers and sisters in the Church, left, right, middle all of you:D However the middle guys annoy me slightly more than the lefties. Atleast with the lefties you know what they’re gonna say. The middle guys however have this kind of work it out as you go feel. They’re neither hot nor cold…so to speak. A middle guy will one minute teach orthodox doctrine, and then the next be playing hard down rock music in the sacrifice of the Mass. Despite the fact that the treatise of how we pray is how we believe, and that rock music is pretty darn secular…

.
I don’t see it this way at all. Lots of people are neither liberal “play fast and loose with the Mass” folks nor are they the ones who want to turn back the clock to a pre-Vatican II Mass. I don’t like adjectives added to the word “Catholic” (I usually say I’m a Catholic of the Latin Rite), but I’m one of those (at the ancient age of 44) who was greatly influenced by John Paul II, our Holy Father for a quarter of the century. I find I’m disliked by both the liberals and the “more Catholic than the pope” types. I don’t think that makes me lukewarm. It may just mean I’m not extreme. My motto is “You can fall out of the boat to the left or to the right, but you’ve still fallen out of the boat.”
 
40.png
AltarMan:
Just follow the Church, not your own ego. It blows me away that the “preeners” believe they can disregard the Church when it comes to posture of receiving Holy Communion (we are instructed to stand/bow in the Latin Rite in the USA), yet are arrogant enough to judge the “liberals.”
Actually, kneeling is used in some countries, and it is safeguarded by the Apostolic See (ya heard me, thats why a Priest aint allowed to deny communion to kneelers).

What ego? If I altar serve, I receive standing, if not, then I receive kneeling. That way I make a point without seeming like an exhibitionist. Perhaps one day when I have a more orthodox parish priest I can kneel when serving too 😃

And honestly, lets use common sense here. You stand to say hi to a friend, to greet a guest. When you meet the Saviour of the world you fall on your knees.

Also, it just appears to be that opinion of our dear German Shepherd that kneeling should be the preferred way. It also has roots in the fathers and simple theology.

Now I’m not saying everyone must kneel. I’m saying that if you feel that its more reverent, then you have a great chance to witness through it.

I find it interesting that you always acknowledge a small (if any) part of my posts to you. If you wanna be taken seriously its going to take a teeny bit more effort. 'Cause between your word and an immemorial tradition, the fathers, scripture and the Pope, all who assure me that kneeling, orthodox parishes, reverent liturgy are totally compatible with the Church, well I’d choose the latter.

With all love, in the spirit of St Paul speaking to St Peter on his cowardice, and begging your pardon: I have conversed with you before, you seem opposed to things like projectors in the Church (which even some of the most orthodox parishes have), yet you disdain people kneeling. But whats more concerning than this is that you always seem to be writing in an arrogant and aggressive tone. Or atleast in a shall we say “bossy” manner? Surely I might be doing this too, (so I ask for correction from my brothers)but I ask thee, please put a little Christian Charity in your posts. Or atleast a smiley face or two. 😃

PAX
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
I don’t see it this way at all. Lots of people are neither liberal “play fast and loose with the Mass” folks nor are they the ones who want to turn back the clock to a pre-Vatican II Mass. I don’t like adjectives added to the word “Catholic” (I usually say I’m a Catholic of the Latin Rite), but I’m one of those (at the ancient age of 44) who was greatly influenced by John Paul II, our Holy Father for a quarter of the century. I find I’m disliked by both the liberals and the “more Catholic than the pope” types. I don’t think that makes me lukewarm. It may just mean I’m not extreme. My motto is “You can fall out of the boat to the left or to the right, but you’ve still fallen out of the boat.”
I love the Novus, its a really great liturgy (when its done right ie incense, organ, chant, bells, cassocks…). Its the one that lead me to Christ. I just get really ticked when people attack the old liturgy (for any reason whatsoever) or people that prefer the Old Liturgy. I mean if it worked for St Francis…

Here is how I define a right winger: "complete submission to the Pope and Magisterium. Love for the Mass, our Blessed Mother and the Saints. Belief in reverent worship and the safeguarding of 2000 years of tradition. Submissive to the words of Vatican II (which is different from the “Spirit” those libs try to push on us).
Did I leave anything out? 😃

I dunno, where I come from when you’re a “right winger” you love the Pope. I can’t really tell you of anyone who thinks they were more orthodox than he.
 
40.png
ComradeAndrei:
Why can’t we say “I believe…” for the Creed? It says “Credo…” and that means “I believe”. This “We believe…” may very well be true, but that is not how it is written.

Also, “Et cum spiritu tuo” is not “and also with you”. How hard is it to say, “and with your spirit”? Or, for “Orate, fratres…” it is NOT “Pray brothers and sisters”, it is “Pray bretheren…”

I’m not anywhere near fluent in Latin, but with my very limited abilities I could easily see what was wrong. If we never hear or read the Latin parts, we’d probably never really know that the translations are wrong, or at least not very faithful to what was actually written.
I don’t much care one way or the other, BUT there’s a rigidity here that I think we could talk about. Fundamentally, does it matter? Don’t start down the road of how it will lead to clown masses and lesbian EMHC’s, just address how important it is:

A) Isn’t it “we” who are saying the creed? Corporately, together, in one congregation? I’m mean, we can say “I” when we’re praying the Creed alone, can’t we? Aren’t we preserving the essentials (God the Father, God the Son, begotten not made, one in being, etc)

B) “Et cum spirito tuo:” Lovely in latin, but kind of awkward in English, IMHO. We don’t talk like that. I don’t get why people get worked up about this. I acknowledge that it doesn’t SAY that precisely, but it’s smoother (again, IMHO) the way it is now.

C) “Orate, Frates:” I dislike the neutering of language in pursuit of some illusive equality for women, but this isn’t an essential, is it? It isn’t the actual wording of the consecration itself. I don’t know any woman who doesn’t know that “human” refers to her, “man” in the Bible contextually refers to her (but I hang out with sensible women), but really, what’s the harm of saying “Pray, my brothers and sisters?” Why get worked up about it? If it changes, I’m not going to get upset. I’ll be obedient. I just don’t get the things that people get worked up about.

Perhaps they don’t get what gets me worked up.
 
40.png
twiztedseraph:
I just get really ticked when people attack the old liturgy (for any reason whatsoever) or people that prefer the Old Liturgy.

.
You’re quote appears above. Here’s the same thing with some changes and it expresses how I feel:

I just get really ticked when people attack the Pauline Mass (for any reason whatsoever) or people that prefer the Pauline Mass.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
You’re quote appears above. Here’s the same thing with some changes and it expresses how I feel:

I just get really ticked when people attack the Pauline Mass (for any reason whatsoever) or people that prefer the Pauline Mass.
Who’s attacking you? I’m not 😃
 
40.png
twiztedseraph:
I dunno, where I come from when you’re a “right winger” you love the Pope. I can’t really tell you of anyone who thinks they were more orthodox than he.
Now, Twistedseraph, you’re being coy! Archbishop Lefebreve? The SSPX? Altarman wasn’t off when he was talking about heterodox on the left and the right.
 
40.png
twiztedseraph:
Who’s attacking you? I’m not 😃
I realize that. And by your definition, I’M ACTUALLY A RIGHT WINGER!!! My grandfather will be so pleased.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
I realize that. And by your definition, I’M ACTUALLY A RIGHT WINGER!!! My grandfather will be so pleased.
Yup. I say however that those that feel that they’re more orthodox than the pope, well they’ve gone over to the dark side. Thats not to say I’d mind if the Church changed back to strictly tridentine, that’s up to the Holy Spirit. I just don’t like how some “traditionalists” divide the Church with their constant aggressiveness.
 
40.png
JKirkLVNV:
Now, Twistedseraph, you’re being coy! Archbishop Lefebreve? The SSPX? Altarman wasn’t off when he was talking about heterodox on the left and the right.
I meant that I knew personally. The SSPX are left wing. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top