Ever heard of this guy? Richard Bennett

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrs_abbott
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, pretty sick stuff right there. However, I am surprised more anti-Catholic sites don’t try and defame knowledgable and well-written converts more often–as they are great examples of how a halfway intelligent person would never fall for the garbage being spewed by alleged “ex-catholics.” (of course, I think Scott Hahn and Marcus Grodi are more than halfway intelligent 😃 ).
Disagreeing with Marcus Grodi and Scott Hahn, I don’t think either of these two gentlemen would object to in any way. In fact I believe they’d welcome the opportunity to discuss the matters of disagreement.

However the mockery and venom directed towards these two very fine men says volumes about the attitudes and character of the people mocking them.

Why can’t they themselves see this?
 
Hello Mrs Abbot!

I must admit I have never heard of this man before, and after listening to him talk, and reading the information on the link I had a whole new take on this type of thing I never had before.

How did you feel after hearing and reading the things you did on the link?

Did you feel that he was filled with the Holy Spirit? Did you get the impression he was at peace in his heart? Did he make you for even a minute scared that you were making the biggest mistake of your life all these years and he finally light the way to expose your deepest concerns or doubts? Or did he give you an uneasy queasy kinda feeling?

I think going into the myriad of faulty reasoning tecniques he uses and refuting each and all of them can only be done once one has determined if he really has anything new to say or not. I have to wonder what took him so long to come to this conclusion after so many years in the Church. Now it was mentioned he is now married., and I am certainly not aware of the time frames involved on when the “lightbulb” went off for him or what all the factors were that were involved in his decision other than what he puts on the bio page.

Who is he? He is a man who left the Eucharist and the Chruch to educate Catholics about how wrong they are on things. Not anything new there. Since the Reformation have any of them been able to do anything more than start up a new religion? Yet many keep their eyes open on the lookout for someone who has it all figured out, better of course than we do.

I would like to research him more and find out as I much as I can before I even start picking apart his weak theology now. I think we can all look at ourselves harder when we see things like this. We all need to pray more for our Priests to keep them from the temptation of heresy and schism… and worse even. Had we all prayed more maybe this man would not be on this path. :o

If I can stomach it I will try to re-read his stuff again and give you some more commentary.

Rest assured he is not correct in his assertions.
 
Damascus;(Edited by Moderator) You asked how this man after so many years in the priesthood could turn from it. How could “Saul” after so many years a Pharisee, extremely zealous for the Law, turn from it?

The answer is the discovery (or personal realization) of absolute, sovereign, divine GRACE (unmerited, unrecompensed, undeserved favor) exercised toward a sinner by God through faith in the Person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ, alone. The cause of radical change of direction in even the most religious and irreligious men alike since Pentecost.
 
The answer is the discovery (or personal realization) of absolute, sovereign, divine GRACE (unmerited, unrecompensed, undeserved favor) exercised toward a sinner by God through faith in the Person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ, alone.
This discovery sounds quite Catholic.
 
The answer is the discovery (or personal realization) of absolute, sovereign, divine GRACE (unmerited, unrecompensed, undeserved favor) exercised toward a sinner by God through faith in the Person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ, alone.
Like I said before, then he must of not been paying attention in Catholic seminary.

One of the promises priests make at their ordination (Paraphrased)… “Do you promise to grow in love and love our Lord Jesus Christ more every day?”
 
Like I said before, then he must of not been paying attention in Catholic seminary.

One of the promises priests make at their ordination (Paraphrased)… “Do you promise to grow in love and love our Lord Jesus Christ more every day?”
Which is quite different from what Peter encouraged the Jewish believers in the area of ancient Turkey to do:2 Pet 3:18 "…but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him {be} the glory, both now and to the day of eternity. Amen."This being a far more objective goal, directed at one personally maturing and increasing in the knowledge of the truth of what He has already done, in full, for us (not the other way around); the foundation and continual basis of our eternal relationship with Him; and the glorious message we, in turn, take to our own generation.
 
My uncle is Richard Bennett, although I’m quite sure he was never a priest or a protestant fundamentalist 😛
 
Which is quite different from what Peter encouraged the Jewish believers in the area of ancient Turkey to do:2 Pet 3:18 "…but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To Him {be} the glory, both now and to the day of eternity. Amen."This being a far more objective goal, directed at one personally maturing and increasing in the knowledge of the truth of what He has already done, in full, for us (not the other way around); the foundation and continual basis of our eternal relationship with Him; and the glorious message we, in turn, take to our own generation.
Are you married? Do you have a wife/husband?

Now, if not, pretend with me for a second. If you love your spouse, arn’t you going to want to learn EVERYTHING there is to know about him/her? Uh, yes.

The more we love Christ, the more grace he pours out upon us.

Priests marry the bride of Christ. It is a complete relationship. If a priest makes it to ordination and doesn’t have an overwhelming relationship with Christ and His Church, he wasn’t paying attention in ANY of his classes. Nor was he praying and actively trying to have one.

In fact, i’m not sure why he stuck around. Priests get pitiful pay. It is a life made up completely of service to Jesus Christ.

Your quote from Scripture did nothing to contradict my previous statement.
 
Are you married? Do you have a wife/husband?

Now, if not, pretend with me for a second. If you love your spouse, arn’t you going to want to learn EVERYTHING there is to know about him/her? Uh, yes.
Absolutely. That’s why Peter says to “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” Only when one grows in the knowledge of such GRACE does one’s relationship become more intimate with Christ.
The more we love Christ, the more grace he pours out upon us.
You have stated a contradiction. Divine “grace” by definition is unmerited, unrecompensed and undeserved favor. It is not conditioned upon any amount of love we have, or exercise, toward Christ. But it is unconditional and infinite toward all who have personally believed the message concerning His Son whom He sent and delivered up to be a propitiation for our sins:1 John 4:10 “In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son {to be} the propitiation for our sins.”
Priests marry the bride of Christ. It is a complete relationship. If a priest makes it to ordination and doesn’t have an overwhelming relationship with Christ and His Church, he wasn’t paying attention in ANY of his classes. Nor was he praying and actively trying to have one.
In fact, i’m not sure why he stuck around. Priests get pitiful pay. It is a life made up completely of service to Jesus Christ.
Obviously he wasn’t in it for the pay, but as a Catholic he considered a way to serve. But he came a point in his life when he fully understood that it begins not with what he does for Christ, but believing what Christ did for him, once for all. And for the first time he entered, by faith, into a salvation relationship with Christ. He understood the full redemptive power of the cross - that he was bought with a price, redeemed by His shed blood (1 Pet. 1:18-19).

He came to the realization, through regeneration, that as a priest he has no power to reconcile anyone to God, but that God HAS reconciled to Himself all who have come to Him through faith in Christ alone2 Cor 5:18-19 “Now all {these} things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.”

He came to the realization that he, as a priest, cannot forgive anyone’s sins, but through Christ, and for His name’s sake, the believer’s sins ARE forgiven:1 John 2:12 “I am writing to you, little children, because your sins have been forgiven you for His name’s sake.”

Acts 10:43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”

Acts 13:38 “Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you,” He went into the priesthood because he believed these were the function of a “priest.” He left because he came to the understanding, through a personal faith in Christ, that these have already been perfectly accomplished through the sacrifice of Christ, and all he really needs to do (like Peter and Paul) is proclaim them. This does not require a separate “priesthood,” but only a man’s willingness to be used by his Lord.
 
Hello Mrs Abbot!

I must admit I have never heard of this man before, and after listening to him talk, and reading the information on the link I had a whole new take on this type of thing I never had before.

How did you feel after hearing and reading the things you did on the link?

Did you feel that he was filled with the Holy Spirit? Did you get the impression he was at peace in his heart? Did he make you for even a minute scared that you were making the biggest mistake of your life all these years and he finally light the way to expose your deepest concerns or doubts? Or did he give you an uneasy queasy kinda feeling?
Well, when I read the first part, I was following him and agreeing with him but when he started denying Mary and the saints, I wasn’t too happy. I guess Mary is a sore spot for me and I believe what the Catholic Church teaches about her.
I think he brings up interesting points but his testimony was vague in certain areas so I wasn’t following it all 100%.
I like how he advocates reading more scripture, though. That’s something we could strive to do. 🙂
40.png
Damascus:
If I can stomach it I will try to re-read his stuff again and give you some more commentary.
Ok, sounds good. 😉
 
My dear Mrs Abbott,

Absolutely not.

Allow me to introduce you to one of my very good friends; John Martignoni. John runs The Bible Christian Society and has some of the finest Catholic apologetics Bible studies around available FREE either as MP3 downloads or on CDs from his apostolate.

In view of your question, I would strongly encourage you to listen to his talk, Apologetics for the Scripturally Challenged as a starting place and then perhaps his Two-minute Apologetics talk and then go from there. John is a really great guy and is a godsend in this era of rampant anti-Catholicsm.

Another excellent resource (also FREE) are the courses from The Catholic Home Study Service. Having completed them all I highly recommend them to you.
Pax tecum,
CM
I know who John is, and I like him a lot…But do you know him personally? Because it seems like you do! 😃
 
Absolutely. That’s why Peter says to “grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” Only when one grows in the knowledge of such GRACE does one’s relationship become more intimate with Christ.You have stated a contradiction. Divine “grace” by definition is unmerited, unrecompensed and undeserved favor. It is not conditioned upon any amount of love we have, or exercise, toward Christ. But it is unconditional and infinite toward all who have personally believed the message concerning His Son whom He sent and delivered up to be a propitiation for our sins:1 John 4:10 "In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son {to be} the propitiation for our sins."Obviously he wasn’t in it for the pay, but as a Catholic he considered a way to serve. But he came a point in his life when he fully understood that it begins not with what he does for Christ, but believing what Christ did for him, once for all. And for the first time he entered, by faith, into a salvation relationship with Christ. He understood the full redemptive power of the cross - that he was bought with a price, redeemed by His shed blood (1 Pet. 1:18-19).

He came to the realization, through regeneration, that as a priest he has no power to reconcile anyone to God, but that God HAS reconciled to Himself all who have come to Him through faith in Christ alone2 Cor 5:18-19 “Now all {these} things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.”

He came to the realization that he, as a priest, cannot forgive anyone’s sins, but through Christ, and for His name’s sake, the believer’s sins ARE forgiven:1 John 2:12 “I am writing to you, little children, because your sins have been forgiven you for His name’s sake.”

Acts 10:43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”

Acts 13:38 “Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you,” He went into the priesthood because he believed these were the function of a “priest.” He left because he came to the understanding, through a personal faith in Christ, that these have already been perfectly accomplished through the sacrifice of Christ, and all he really needs to do (like Peter and Paul) is proclaim them. This does not require a separate “priesthood,” but only a man’s willingness to be used by his Lord.
All of this was thoroughly addressed in the Help Me Romans 4 thread. I listed a number of verses that completely contradicts everything you said and that you either ignored or did not adequately respond after I responded to your rebuttal. I have added additional information since you last left the thread, and you did not respond. Throwing out the same verses without addressing the verses I listed is not an adequate response.

BTW, the Bible uses “eternal life” in two senses. One refers to the justified’s participation in the very life of God in this life (all the verses you keep quoting from John and also 2 Peter 1:4). This life is eternal not because we become eternally secure, but because it is the life of God who, by His very nature, is eternal and immortal. As long as we participate in this life, we are assured salvation. However, if we are cut off from the source of eternal life, we will wither like a branch cut off from the vine, it’s source of life, and thrown into the fire. “Eternal life” in the second sense is used in reference to the final consumation of our salvation, gorification (Romans 2:6-7, Matthew 25:46, Luke 18:30).

God Bless,
Michael
 
**Damascus, You asked how this man after so many years in the priesthood could turn from it. How could “Saul” after so many years a Pharisee, extremely zealous for the Law, turn from it?

The answer is the discovery (or personal realization) of absolute, sovereign, divine GRACE (unmerited, unrecompensed, undeserved favor) exercised toward a sinner by God through faith in the Person and work of His Son, Jesus Christ, alone. The cause of radical change of direction in even the most religious and irreligious men alike since Pentecost**.
Amen!!!
 
Richard Bennett left the Catholic Church for the same reason other Catholics have left, they truly lacked an understanding of Catholic teaching and were misled.

Thank God that we have so many Protestant ministers who have seen the light and have joined the Catholic Church, the only Church that can trace it’s history back to the apostolic age and that faithfully teaches the fullness of the truth. Many of them are firm defenders of the Catholic Faith.

God Bless,
Michael
 
Richard Bennett left the Catholic Church for the same reason other Catholics have left, they truly lacked an understanding of Catholic teaching and were misled.

Thank God that we have so many Protestant ministers who have seen the light and have joined the Catholic Church, the only Church that can trace it’s history back to the apostolic age and that faithfully teaches the fullness of the truth. Many of them are firm defenders of the Catholic Faith.

God Bless,
Michael
Amen!!!
 
Does Catholicism contradict the Bible, though, like he says?
No, of course not. It’s difficult to believe that he was ever a Catholic priest, as he claims, since priests read the Bible five or six times a day when they do their Breviary prayers. Also, priests are required to memorize significant portions of Scripture before they can be ordained to the priesthood - not to mention the amount of Scripture read out at Mass. As a priest, he would also have been responsible for leading parish Bible studies, and for teaching Catechism classes where the Bible would be discussed and taught, as well.

It was Jesus who gave us the Sacraments and the priesthood. Who are we, to throw away gifts that our Saviour has given to us? Who are we to say that we have “outgrown” such things or that “the time of the Sacraments and the priesthood is over, and we will now stand on our own two feet, with faith alone.”

Who are we to make those kind of decisions? Surely, we have a duty as children of God to gratefully accept and use every good gift that He sends us, rather than scorn and despise them. Wouldn’t you think? That’s my take on it, anyway.
 
No, of course not. It’s difficult to believe that he was ever a Catholic priest, as he claims, since priests read the Bible five or six times a day when they do their Breviary prayers. Also, priests are required to memorize significant portions of Scripture before they can be ordained to the priesthood - not to mention the amount of Scripture read out at Mass. As a priest, he would also have been responsible for leading parish Bible studies, and for teaching Catechism classes where the Bible would be discussed and taught, as well.
Indeed. The whole thing sounds sketchy.

At one point in his story he said he never read Scripture, but instead prayed the Divine Office from his Breviary. I didn’t know if I should laugh or cry - the Divine Office is nothing BUT Scripture readings and prayers based on direct quotes from Scripture.
 
No, of course not. It’s difficult to believe that he was ever a Catholic priest, as he claims, since priests read the Bible five or six times a day when they do their Breviary prayers. . . . .
Unfortunately, I can believe it. I had the sad experience of hearing in person a “former” Jesuit priest expound on the errors of the Church (this was a priest well-known within the diocese before he left the Church). You’d have thought, as with Richard Bennett, that he was either lying about being a priest or had been very badly instructed during his seminary years. It seems that it becomes quite easy for priests who have abandoned the Church for the grass on the other side of the fence to lie. 😦
 
All of this was thoroughly addressed in the Help Me Romans 4 thread. I listed a number of verses that completely contradicts everything you said and that you either ignored or did not adequately respond after I responded to your rebuttal. I have added additional information since you last left the thread, and you did not respond. Throwing out the same verses without addressing the verses I listed is not an adequate response.

BTW, the Bible uses “eternal life” in two senses. One refers to the justified’s participation in the very life of God in this life (all the verses you keep quoting from John and also 2 Peter 1:4). This life is eternal not because we become eternally secure, but because it is the life of God who, by His very nature, is eternal and immortal. As long as we participate in this life, we are assured salvation. However, if we are cut off from the source of eternal life, we will wither like a branch cut off from the vine, it’s source of life, and thrown into the fire. “Eternal life” in the second sense is used in reference to the final consumation of our salvation, gorification (Romans 2:6-7, Matthew 25:46, Luke 18:30).

God Bless,
Michael
Michael, I presented MANY posts on that thread of which the contents were ignored. That’s the way it usually happens. And I couldn’t keep up with all you guys ganging up on me. It becomes exhausting. Remember, I’m just one against many here.

As for “eternal life,” it’s a GIFT from God. There is only one life which God GIFTS the one who turns from unbelief to belief in His Son, and that’s “eternal.” It’s “eternal” because that life originates in the resurrected Son of God, and all who truly believe in Him, according to the Scriptures, are now "in Christ."John 3:36 "He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him."To obey Him is to believe in Him.John 8:24 “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am {He,} you will die in your sins.”

Rom. 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord."You can rationalize all you want, Michael, but the Scriptures are VERY clear. The life that is freely given by God to those who receive His Son by faith is nothing less than “eternal” (everlasting). His life is given to them because they have been redeemed and purified by His blood, and their sins forever forgiven, having been, once for all, buried with Christ who died unto them, and rose again to new life (Rom. 6). It’s the wonder of Christ’s substitutionary sacrifice.

This is what the the gospel message is all about, Michael. The word “gospel” means "good news."1 John 2:25 “This is the promise which He Himself made to us: eternal life.”

1 John 5:11 “And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.”

1 John 5:13 "These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life."It’s not that the Scriptures are ambiguous, but that you refuse to believe “the testimony.” I can’t help you there. But from this day forward I can certainly pray that you might believe “the testimony,” and you too might come to “know” what John, the beloved Apostle, has written.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top