Evidence that God Exists

[Freebird]

The whole subject for this thread is the evidence that this belief is true. Do you have evidence for these beliefs?

If there was evidence, faith would not be needed…as God is bigger than all reason, as He created reason, we cannot limit Him to that aspect of our human spectulation (as has already been stated in this thread). God, faith, then finally understanding–through God in whom we have faith in.

As a side note, imagine how many more people would show up to a Catholic mass every sunday if the bread and wine routinely tasted and looked exactly like flesh and blood.

And now, consider how many people that would repulse.

God knows He cannot be reveal Himself to us, His Created, in his full-fledged glory–it would be totally overwhelming.

I don’t believe in inherent good and evil or an afterlife. I also believe there is any goal that humans inherently are working towards. We all have to make choices (whether free or not) about how we are going to live our lives and how we want others to live theirs and what we are going to do to achieve the ends of our choices.

I often wonder how atheists, agnostics, ect., find fulfillment through these beliefs.
Best of luck in future, my brother.
God Bless,
bree.

 

[Benedictus]

I often wonder how atheists, agnostics, ect., find fulfillment through these beliefs.

The atheist/agnostic could retort that wishing will not make it so.

 

[Ammonius_Saccus]

If there was evidence, faith would not be needed

Didn’t you say that you did have evidence before? You did write:

Why should I conform to your viewpoint, when I actually have what I consider to be solid evidence?

If you don’t have evidence, why do you believe these things are actually true and not just what you want to be true?

 

[JesuisSean]

PROOF DOES EXIST.

Imagine a fellow that suddenly learnt the Japanese language, and after doing so he said that thanks to learning the Japanese language he now had learnt ALL languages, such as French, German, Swedish, Portuguese, etc… Would you think that he was an idiot, or perhaps a crazy person? Is not one language different than all others?

Imagine way back in world war two, a basic secret encoding** language** was being used by a spy to send top secret information back to his home country, but due to the simplicity of this particular code language it could be broken in less than 2 days by the enemy.

But moving on, new and better encoding languages soon were developed that were much much much harder to break and so it could truly take years to actually crack these highly sophisticated codes. Now imagine a fellow that said that since the old basic encoding language could be broken in less than two days, ALL other encoding languages could also be broken in less than two days, for he has learnt the old encoding language and thus in turn has learnt ALL other encoding languages at the same time. Would you think that he was an idiot, or perhaps a crazy person? Is not one language different than all others?

Now imagine there existed a True Bible Code language that Satan wanted to keep out of the hands and eyes of mankind due to it also proving the true existence of God. What would Satan have to do to ensure that mankind would ignore this particular Bible Code language?

He would simply have convince people to behave like absolute crazy idiots who thus would reject ALL Bible Code languages long before the True Bible Code language was even exposed, and do so by giving the impression that it is completely sane to reject ALL Bible Codes of any code language if just the first code language to be studied is eventually found to be of no value. As bloody stupid and absolutely ridiculous as this may seem, today it is being said that ONE Bible Code language speaks for ALL other languages in the land of Bible Codes.

And in turn the True Bible Codes have been completely ignored for years now, thus the Evidence that God Exists has been completely ignored.

Thus outside of religion, it is seen that learning Japanese does not at the same time expose you to all other languages. However, within religion, it is clearly being said that the examining of just one Bible Code language, exposes you to all other Bible Code languages at the same time. Thus when ONE particular Bible Code language did poorly during a statistical analysis, it was instantly assumed that ALL other Bible Code languages fail the statistical analysis as well. All others were rejected even though non of them at all were being examined.

Have those within religion all gone insane? Is not one language different than all others?