GA wrote
Yes we believe that the bible has been corrupted, we don’t have problem with verses that agree 100% with Islam. Especially why we try to prove some thing to you.
And that quote agrees with Islam:
I mentioned this sometime back and I’ll say it again, you have this alllllllll wrong and bass ackwards.
Let’s, for example, take the following from Shakespeare
“To be or not to be, --that is the question:–
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them?”
If Joe Blo comes along about 50 years after Shakespeare and writes the Hamlet play again and says “To be it is not to be, that is the final answer”. Would you say that Shakespeare’s Hamlet does not agree with Joe Blo or that Joe Blo does not agree with Shakespeare? Of course everybody would say that Joe Blo got it wrong and he is the one that does not agree with Shakespeare because Shakespeare wrote Hamlet many years before Joe Blo. Shakespeare wrote it & he should know better.
When you say that you will accept Bible verse when they agree with Islam is all wrong. The Bible came about 300 years
before Islam, so it’s the other way around buddy. The Bible agrees with what was being taught by the Church from its inception. If it did not agree it was rejected. So the Bible does NOT contradict the teachings of the Early Church. If Islam was to be accepted it HAD to agree with the Bible, not the other way around.
Anything that contradicts the Bible has to be rejected. Thus any teaching in Islam which came 600 years after Christianity started, MUST be rejected because THEY are the ones that do not agree with the Bible.
I found
this & I saw it explained in a similar way some years ago. Here’s the relevant passage: “And a ruler asked him (Jesus), 'Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? nd Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.’” (Luke 18:18-19)
I can understand the confusion. On the surface, it seems like Jesus is claiming not to be good, and not be God. But actually, He’s asking why the man is calling him good, when the man actually doesn’t believe He is (
reading on in Luke 18, you’ll see that this man favors his own wealth over Jesus). Essentially, Jesus is saying, “If you don’t believe I’m God, then why are you addressing me in a term that ultimately applies to God alone?”
It’s true that people can be ‘good’, but only in a relative sense. Someone who is charitable and loving would be someone most of us would call ‘good’. However, in relation to God, none of us are good. We’re all sinners, and none of us are so good that we deserve to be with God. It’s only through the forgiveness of God through the sacrifice Jesus made on the cross that we are united with God. Ultimately, only God is good, and (as Jesus is saying here)
only those who recognize Jesus as God have the right to call Him good.
(Emphasis mine) So be careful when you mention Jesus and type PUBH after His name.