Evil Harry Potter

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wozza
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
JulianN said:
one person’s viewpoint rather than that of Christ’s Church.
Click to expand...
Another interesting perspective. Is my interpretation a private one?.. Do I share it with millions of other non-Catholics?.. Am I not one living stone in Christ’s Church? YES to all!
 
If the Catholic faith has it’s roots in the teachings of the Apostles, prophets, and Jesus Christ being the chief corner stone, then your judgment is irresponsible. Have I left the Catholic faith in terms of it’s denominational views and leadership?.. yes… Have I left the universal Church to which the (Catholic view from Rome) is just one slice in this very large pie? … No. I still believe in Jesus who is the eternal Christ. My faith is solid on Him.
 
Gods church may include the CC but not be limited to it. This is the point. The CC refuses to accept people unless they embrace their organization and ALL tenants of Catholic faith. All others seem to be as a sub-class of Christian
 
Last edited:
I think the whole matter boils down to whether
the Communion is taking the Flesh and Blood
of our Lord, it separates the CC from the other
denominations of Christianity. This is a grave
mistake to build a “WALL” which separates and
divides!! One of the Seven Deadly Sins is to
cause Dissension among Brethren!! See Prov.
6:19
 
tgGodsway said:
ALL tenants of Catholic faith.
Click to expand...
Of course.
These are the teachings handed down by God.

Who exactly would any one of us be to contradict God?

It really comes down to a question.
Is the Catholic Church God’s or is it not?
If it is, then all of it is. Every dogma, every Tradition is God’s, and we should follow them.
If it is not, then it should be treated as such.
 
tgGodsway said:
I accept the authority of the Apostolic Catholic Church.
Click to expand...
I for one would welcome you wholeheartedly if you decided to cross the Tiber.

We need good men* like you!!

(*or women if you’re female)
 
Last edited:
Well if your premise is correct that the CC is infallible therefore all other groups must fall in line, then my question is: on what apostalic basis? In other words how did the founders of the Christian faith teach this? What biblical record are you looking at that teaches this?
 
Thou are Peter (petros=rock= in the masculine form) and upon this Rock = (petra=bolder in the neuter form) I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail … I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven and whatever you will bind on earth will be bound… "

What part of this passage does Matthew’s gospel talk about the office of Pope?.. What part of it does it talk about this office would be the vicar or Christ on earth? What part of this passage says the Pope would have supremacy over Apostles? What part does it say that Peter would graduate from Apostle to head of the universal Church on earth?.. haven’t you read too much into it?
 
He/she doesn’t need to “cross the Tiber.” Just go to confession and resume life as a Catholic.
 
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I read something in? Haven’t you made quite a lot of assumptions about what I might have meant? All while parroting a bad translation and completely ignoring the second question.

Batting average = 0.000
 
tgGodsway said:
then my question is: on what apostalic basis? In other words how did the founders of the Christian faith teach this?
Click to expand...
This is pretty much a thing throughout the early church. Are you at all familiar with the writings of the early church fathers?
 
Last edited:
vz71 said:
This is pretty much a thing throughout the early church. Are you at all familiar with the writings of the early church fathers?
Click to expand...
When you say, “early church fathers?” what time frame are you referring? The earliest church fathers were the 1st. century Apostles, prophets, and gospel writers. They were the first-hand eye witnesses to the Christian faith. Their record was given to us by the Holy Spirit to be preserved in every generation.
Any and all other “Church fathers” must be subservient to the earliest N.t. fathers or witnesses. For the most part, people outside of the Apostolic circle (in the first two centuries) did not record history because of fear of persecution. The others came centuries later from areas of the world in-conducive and far removed from the original inner circle.
 
Last edited:
How did the Apostles teach that one central Church would become infallible in terms of doctrine and practice? I see the opposite. The apostles were always making corrections in the church because of false doctrine prevalent in every group. Jesus rebuked seven Churches in the book of Revelation because they in no way were infallible. yet today, the CC makes this claim that their doctrine is infallible. I’m just trying to understand on what authoritative basis is this claim made?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top