Evolution is contradictory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buss0042
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, you read them. See what you get out of them. The process of education excluded spoon feeding a long time ago, in my country.
 
Science works by research, real research. Literature review search engine research usually ends badly, as we have seen with the attempt to justify one woman’s research as our own, or justifying ours with that one.
 
Aloysium said:
Your post is rather cryptic
Thoughts that came to mind include:

It’s best not to underestimate people.

Most people are able to follow an intelligent conversation because an intelligent person tries to explain at the level of the person he’s speaking to
One shouldn’t assume a person knows less than oneself simply because they disagree.
Click to expand...
degrees and resumes at 20 paces?
Awesome!

But wait, what’s your area of expertise, that you hold a piece of paper or two in.
 
buffalo said:
40.png
Bradskii:
I wonder if we could draw any conclusions from that?
Click to expand...
Yes, we can. Atheists need the godless creation myth.
Click to expand...
Nobody in this thread has excluded God when explaining evolution. Least of all atheists. Least of all me.

It’s not a godless evolution you are tilting at. It’s an undestanding of the world that contradicts your fundamental views. You fool no-one.

Except maybe yourself. But as someone once said: The easiest person to fool is yourself.

Oh look. There he is in my icon.
 
buffalo said:
40.png
rossum:
Now it is your turn. Where are your 5,000,000 papers/experiments supporting ID?
Click to expand...
My my, that is how science is done now? Science by consensus or search engine hits, folks. There, that proves it.

As in J Harlen Bretz’s case, only one is needed to debunk.
Click to expand...
You asked for references supporting evolution. Rossum gave them to you. And still you complain.

Only one experiment is needed to debunk a theory, but you have not provided that experiment either, so that is a non-sequitur.
 
buffalo said:
And you pulled out two 60 year old one’s to make your case?
Click to expand...
While you give me a 3,000 year old book? Are those two experiments too young for you?

You still have not shown any experiments supporting ID, buffalo. Evolution is ahead by five million papers (plus two) to nil. Not looking good for ID.

rossum
 
That transition makes perfect sense. There doesn’t appear to be any gaps… :roll_eyes:
 
This picture never gets old! A real “whale of a tale” if I may say so myself!
 
Bradskii said:
Apart from one or two tinfoil hat wearing outliers, all those who denigrate evolution are Christians.

I wonder if we could draw any conclusions from that?
Click to expand...
There you go again. Witty but not very wise. You do know that numbering 2.2 billion people worldwide, Christians make up the world’s largest religion by a margin of one billion. So, duh … yes, those who oppose evolution are most likely Christian.

One or two dissenters? I think not. Best to broaden your reading; apparently you’ve fallen behind quite a bit.

https://www.amazon.com/What-Darwin-Wrong-Jerry-Fodor/dp/031268066X

[P]hilosopher Jerry Fodor of Rutgers University and the cognitive scientist Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini of the University of Arizona in Tucson. In What Darwin Got Wrong (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010), these self-described atheists argue that the theory of natural selection is “fatally flawed.”
 
Techno2000 said:
This is all you really need know.
Click to expand...
Appearances! For some interpreters of the fossil record, more complex life forms appear to have evolved from less complex life forms. Similarly, from an observer on earth, the sun appears to move across the sky from east to west, the moon and the whole night sky too. A mirage in the desert appears to be water. The red shift of distant galaxies appears to be that distant galaxies are moving away from us. The bread and wine of the eucharist appear to be just bread and wine. Appearances!
 
Last edited:
Richca said:
Appearances! For some interpreters of the fossil record, more complex life forms appear to have evolved from less complex life forms. Similarly, from an observer on earth, the sun appears to move across the sky from east to west, the moon and the whole night sky too. A mirage in the desert appears to be water. The red shift of distant galaxies appears to be that distant galaxies are moving away from us. The bread and wine of the eucharist appear to be just bread and wine. Appearances!
Click to expand...
The appearance of the sun moving around the earth was corrected when observations from other places on earth and from space showed that to be wrong. The mirage in the desert is quickly shown to be wrong when observations from close up show there is no water there. The appearance of evolution being a fact will be shown wrong when further observations show it to be wrong. We are still waiting for those further observations.

As for the red shift, that appearance that the stars are moving away from us is so far still holding true.
 
Last edited:
Richca said:
40.png
Techno2000:
This is all you really need know.
Click to expand...
Appearances! For some interpreters of the fossil record, more complex life forms appear to have evolved from less complex life forms. Similarly, from an observer on earth, the sun appears to move across the sky from east to west, the moon and the whole night sky too. A mirage in the desert appears to be water. The red shift of distant galaxies appears to be that distant galaxies are moving away from us. The bread and wine of the eucharist appear to be just bread and wine. Appearances!
Click to expand...
And like Cruciferi said, what about these huge gaps between these transitional creatures ? :roll_eyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top