**DENVER POST
JANUARY 2, 2005
**
New year, new level of tolerance, perhaps?http://www.denverpost.com/cda/images/article/spacer.gif
By Barrie Hartman
Here in Boulder land, where the left is always right and the right is always wrong, a debate is raging over whether a public school is really a religious school.
Peak to Peak charter school in Lafayette is just a stone’s throw from the liberal city of Boulder. Some parents are accusing Peak to Peak of turning into a Christian academy funded by tax dollars. The tension, they say, has caused a few teachers to quit and some parents to pull out their kids.
**Even worse, a girl attempted suicide last month after complaining she was bullied by students for believing in evolution, not creationism.
![Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f626.png)
**
Peak to Peak and district officials staunchly defend the K-12 school, saying that it is neither plagued by “fundies” (fundamental Christian bullies) nor subservient to an evangelical agenda.
Because I know parents who founded Peak to Peak, I’m skeptical about the validity of the accusations. However, if religious education is actually making inroads into the liberal heartland of the state, what, for goodness sakes, is happening elsewhere?
It’s a serious matter that needs to be watched. Yet, I worry about the growing tendency to shoot first and ask questions later, a category into which the Lafayette situation may well fall. In any case, religious tolerance is being tested like never before, and we liberals can be just as guilty of seeing a conspiracy at the drop of a Bible as the right can be in seeing hatred for Jesus in every religious challenge.
Granted, there’s good reason for liberals to be wary. The born-agains, with their newfound power, are letting their true feelings hang out, such as judging homosexuality as sinful rather than as a biological roll of the dice.
Or teaching children that the Earth is 6,000 years old, as the Bible says, not 4.5 billion-plus, as scientific evidence makes clear.
Or not just opposing abortion, but admitting that the ultimate target is contraception.
Or condemning stem-cell research, even though exploration could lead to improving lives for victims of savage diseases like multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s in decades to come.
And then there’s the Iraq war, which many evangelicals defend as a crusade for Christ.
As wrong as I feel Christian rightists are on these issues, there are others that we liberals shouldn’t be so reticent about supporting - such as resisting gay marriage. It’s clear that the nation isn’t ready for that yet. But - hooray! - the right may be willing to accept civil unions as a compromise. Let’s go for it. Also, how many of us Christian libs were just as bothered as the right - but said nothing - when the Downtown Denver Partnership barred floats with religious themes from the holiday parade?
Or how many of us stood with the right in expressing displeasure as schools and cities went overboard making certain no one was offended by saying “Merry Christmas” or by singing a Christmas song?
My grandson, a fourth-grader, sang in the “winter program” at his school in Thornton. I didn’t recognize a single song. Apparently, neither did anyone else. “Good grief,” grumped a mom. “Couldn’t they at least have sung 'Frosty the Snowman?”’
We liberal Christians must be careful not to judge conservatives as being of one mind on everything. We’re certainly not.
My mail, phone calls and friendships show as many differences among Christian rightists as among any grouping of adults. To place them solidly in the mindset of the Jerry Falwells and James Dobsons is as wrong as labeling liberals as anti-American and morally vapid.
Jim Vandel of Cheyenne illustrates the dilemma so many of us experience.
“As a conservative, I want to have a balanced budget and a strong national defense,” he writes. "As a Methodist, I want to be able to tolerate others’ beliefs while they tolerate mine. I want to support the Constitution but don’t want it changed in order to protect the flag or deny rights to gays or anybody else not exactly like me.
"What I don’t understand is why others call themselves conservative and yet support politicians wanting to spend us into bankruptcy, conduct a totally unnecessary and probably counterproductive war and support actions that would stifle freedom in this country.
“Bottom line, I have become confused about liberal/conservative.” Vandel then goes on to suggest that many of us on the left and right actually belong in “the radical center.”
The point is most of us are not purely one way or the other. And that means there ought to be ways to break down the walls of arrogant resistance between us.
Nothing like a brand new year to get the ball rolling.
denverpost.com/Stories/0…2626927,00.html