Ex-Catholics Who Are Now Protestants

  • Thread starter Thread starter writer12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How would you define it?:hmmm:
1: exalted or worthy of complete devotion as one perfect in goodness and righteousness
2: DIVINE <for the Lord our God is holy — Psalms 99:9(Authorized Version)>
3: devoted entirely to the deity or the work of the deity
4 a : having a divine quality
b : venerated as or as if sacred

Sanctitas in the Vulgate of the New Testament is the rendering of two distinct words, hagiosyne (1 Thess., iii,13) and hosiotes (Luke 1:75; Ephesians 4:24). These two Greek words express respectively the two ideas connoted by “holiness” viz.: that of separation as seen in hagios from hagos, which denotes “any matter of religious awe” (the Latin sacer); and that of sanctioned (sancitus), that which is hosios has received God’s seal.
 
As to the sacaments, they didn’t seem to work. If they were effective channels of grace, we should all be a lot holier I’d think. I sure wasn’t.
Sacraments are not magic. In the CC personal responsibility comes into play.
 
Bold mine.
You know this how? Are you living thier lives? Are you in their homes? Do you know what in particular they struggle with? Are you there beside the priest in the Confession booth? Quite frankly, who are you to judge? Only One can see into the deep caverns of our hearts, including yours, God alone.
I don’t judge anyone’s soul… but one can determine from normal, honest conversation with them whether or not they believe and act on basic teachings of the catholic church, no?
 
Sacraments are not magic. In the CC personal responsibility comes into play.
That’s interesting, the magic comment. Because magic is usually defined as something like a supernatural vending machine: correct (name removed by moderator)ut will always get you a guaranteed supernatural output. Say the spell or enact the charm in the right way, with right intent, using the right words, and there you have it…

Now at the mass for example, as long as the priest intends what the church intends, and uses the right form and materials, the Holy Spirit must come down and supernaturally transform the offering. Sounds quite similar to me.
 
That’s interesting, the magic comment. Because magic is usually defined as something like a supernatural vending machine: correct (name removed by moderator)ut will always get you a guaranteed supernatural output. Say the spell or enact the charm in the right way, with right intent, using the right words, and there you have it…
Is that what you were taught at RCIA about the sacraments? And what is the IT that you will have from them?
 
I don’t judge anyone’s soul… but one can determine from normal, honest conversation with them whether or not they believe and act on basic teachings of the catholic church, no?
You just contridicted yourself in your own post. Or as a wise man said once, anything after the word “but” belies what you just stated.
You have **no way at all **of knowing what is in the heart other Catholics. Living up to your standards does not mean your standard is the same as Gods.
Come down off the mountain.
 
That’s interesting, the magic comment. Because magic is usually defined as something like a supernatural vending machine: correct (name removed by moderator)ut will always get you a guaranteed supernatural output. Say the spell or enact the charm in the right way, with right intent, using the right words, and there you have it…

Now at the mass for example, as long as the priest intends what the church intends, and uses the right form and materials, the Holy Spirit must come down and supernaturally transform the offering. Sounds quite similar to me.
Are you equating the Eucharist with a spell or a charm?
 
I don’t judge anyone’s soul… but one can determine from normal, honest conversation with them whether or not they believe and act on basic teachings of the catholic church, no?
🙂 I wasn’t looking for a perfect group of people. But I was looking for signs of a people getting better, so I could get better too.
So you blame your sin on others? Are Protestants free of all sin?
 
You just contridicted yourself in your own post. Or as a wise man said once, anything after the word “but” belies what you just stated.
You have **no way at all **of knowing what is in the heart other Catholics. Living up to your standards does not mean your standard is the same as Gods.
Come down off the mountain.
Let me ask you this: If you met someone and they told you they were Catholic, but then proceeded to tell you over time how much they supported gay marriage, told you they didn’t subscribe to that “old fashioned” church teaching about sex outside of marriage, and told you that abortion is acceptable sometimes, wouldn’t you be able to safely say they aren’t faithful to church teaching?

That’s not judging anyone’s heart, it’s just making an empirical observation based on comparing church teaching to what this person publicly professes and how they act. 🤷 Common sense.

BTW, if a person has no way of judging another’s heart (and I agree with you there) then how is it the priest goes about judging the parishioner in confession? He can judge the person unrepentant and withold the sacrament if he feels the need to. But that’s juding another’s heart, isn’t it?
 
So you blame your sin on others? Are Protestants free of all sin?
No, I don’t. Don’t think I wrote that either. 😉 Just said I was looking for a community of faithful believers who as a whole would be working toward loving God and neighbor more and more.
 
Are you equating the Eucharist with a spell or a charm?
I see similarities. Just something I’ve been thinking about for the past couple of weeks. It’s amazing how much it has in common with “ritual magick” as they call it, and how different both are from what I see Jesus doing in the NT.
 
I think you did blame your lack of goodness on others.
Except that my previous post says otherwise. You seem to be reading into it something that isn’t there. Just like someone read “contempt” into an earlier post in this thread and reported me to admin, when I was really just expressing thoughts that have occurred to me as a Non-Catholic in this Non-Catholic Religion section of the forum. That kinda hurt, ya know.
 
Is that what you were taught in RCIA? Did you attend RCIA?
Yes. Read my catechism, too. And a great deal of the Church fathers as well, Augustine’s City of God being my favorite work. I’ve read Aquinas’ Shorter Summa, plus Ignatius, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Therese, St Francis DeSales, and numerous others. And then everyone from Scott Hahn to Benedict XVI represent the range of modern writers I’ve read. And most importantly, the Bible.

Maybe I’ve read too much for my own good…
 
Yes. Read my catechism, too. And a great deal of the Church fathers as well, Augustine’s City of God being my favorite work. I’ve read Aquinas’ Shorter Summa, plus Ignatius, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Therese, St Francis DeSales, and numerous others. And then everyone from Scott Hahn to Benedict XVI represent the range of modern writers I’ve read. And most importantly, the Bible.
**
Maybe I’ve read too** much for my own good…
😉

I’m sure many “ex-Protestants who are now Catholic” feel the same way (in reverse).
 
Yes. Read my catechism, too. And a great deal of the Church fathers as well, Augustine’s City of God being my favorite work. I’ve read Aquinas’ Shorter Summa, plus Ignatius, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Therese, St Francis DeSales, and numerous others. And then everyone from Scott Hahn to Benedict XVI represent the range of modern writers I’ve read. And most importantly, the Bible.

Maybe I’ve read too much for my own good…
No, reading too much is impossible.
Reading and not understanding is very possible. From your posts so far, I don’t think you understand what you read. I say this because your post #34 seems irrational and each following post seems to show more contempt than understanding.
 
No, reading too much is impossible.
Reading and not understanding is very possible. From your posts so far, I don’t think you understand what you read. I say this because your post #34 seems irrational and each following post seems to show more contempt than understanding.
I don’t see why you think that. Can you be more specific, please?

And I assure you, I mean no offense, and I apologize if something else has been percieved.
 
Let me ask you this: If you met someone and they told you they were Catholic, but then proceeded to tell you over time how much they supported gay marriage, told you they didn’t subscribe to that “old fashioned” church teaching about sex outside of marriage, and told you that abortion is acceptable sometimes, wouldn’t you be able to safely say they aren’t faithful to church teaching?

That’s not judging anyone’s heart, it’s just making an empirical observation based on comparing church teaching to what this person publicly professes and how they act. 🤷 Common sense.
I get what you are saying and it is something I struggle with personally. I, too, wanted a church that would help me grow spiritually, where people believed the teachings of their church and practiced them and where my own failings would be kindly understood by others who have made mistakes and then corrected those mistakes to the best of their ability. When you start to see and hear Catholics not living or even believing in the Church’s teachings it can be a blow.

For me, it’s about separating the Catholic Church itself from the parishioners. The parishioners may not be living the teachings. Some of them may be trying their best and others may discard those teachings as old fashioned or nonsensical or even cruel. But those people aren’t the entire Church. They are just a part of it. And those people are just like everyone else. They’re imperfect sinners.

Do I believe in the Church? Yes. Do I believe and/or live all of the teachings? No. If you met me at your parish I may have told you through conversation about my tubal ligation (12 years ago, before I ever dreamed of converting) or that I am married with a previous marriage that has not been annulled yet or even that I support non-religious same sex marriage as a matter of social conscience. What would you have thought of me? I may not have mentioned that I am trying to fully understand the Church’s teachings so that I can better live them, but I’m not there yet. I would have assumed that you understood that part since I was there at Mass in the first place. From what I have seen and heard I think most people are like me. They’re working on it, but not there yet.

Seems to me like you just couldn’t separate the Church itself from some of the people who attend and this made it difficult, if not impossible, for you to grow in faith and experience God’s love. So you left in order to continue your spiritual growth. Which is reasonable. And says something good about you. It says that you hunger for faith and spiritual growth. And I don’t believe God would deny you that no matter where you worship as long as your heart is sincere.
 
I’d define it as “engaged in the process of sanctification”. Sanctification is something I would tie strongly to the Great Commandment of loving God and loving neighbor. Therefore, if the church in question is holy, it would be something that noticeably and steadily transforms hearts and minds, redirecting them toward love of God and neighbor.

How would you define it?:hmmm:
My friend, I think you are putting too much thought into it.

To be Holy is to be separated from death to have life in Christ. As Peter says here:
A Call to Holy Living
1 Peter 1:13 Therefore gird up your minds, be sober, set your hope fully upon the grace that is coming to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ. 14 As obedient children, do not be conformed to the passions of your former ignorance, 15 but as he who called you is holy, be holy yourselves in all your conduct; 16 since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.” 17 And if you invoke as Father him who judges each one impartially according to his deeds, conduct yourselves with fear throughout the time of your exile. 18 You know that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your fathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold, 19 but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot. 20 He was destined before the foundation of the world but was made manifest at the end of the times for your sake. 21 Through him you have confidence in God, who raised him from the dead and gave him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God.
22 Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere love of the brethren, love one another earnestly from the heart. 23 You have been born anew, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God; 24 for
“All flesh is like grass
and all its glory like the flower of grass.
The grass withers, and the flower falls,
25 but the word of the Lord abides for ever.”
That word is the good news which was preached to you.
When we get caught up in all this terms and definitions (justification, sanctification, glorification, et. al.), we lose sight of what is truly important: Christ.

While it is good to know and understand, the moment we start to drift away from a Christ centered argument we have lost that battle even if we win that argument.

So to be holy is not because of who or what we are, but because it is what we are called to be because Christ has singled us out. We enter then a process of turning away (repent) from our old ways and our old lives to learn how to live under Christ’s commands and for God’s purpose and in accordance to His Will, and more importantly for His Glory.

That doesn’t meant that we are immediately transformed, some will be transformed faster than others. Some will not be transformed at all and sadly turn away from our Lord’s Graces.

Keeping this in mind, John tells us:
God Is Light
1 John 1:5 This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light and in him is no darkness[d] at all. 6 If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not live according to the truth; 7 but if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin. 8 If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
We are sinners, all of us. Very few will grow stronger in the Faith, where sin will become a minimal part of their lives. The majority of us will struggle with sin but we will be able to overcome a significant part through Christ our Lord, others will struggle enormously and will have unending battles with sin. But still… we have been called out by Christ and that separates us from death as long as we obey His commands. And when we fail to obey them we have the Sacrament of Reconciliation to restore that relationship with Him, which is part of His commandments as well.

Now when you say:
Because it looked “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic”. And because of the sacraments.

But I found it terribly divided, not any holier than any other church, hardly universal, and apostolic succession didn’t seem so important after reading the NT again and seeing Peter needing correcting by Paul.

As to the sacaments, they didn’t seem to work. If they were effective channels of grace, we should all be a lot holier I’d think. I sure wasn’t.

Hope that doesn’t sound too sharp. Just trying to be honest about it.
I find that you passed on an opportunity to make a difference. If that Church you attended was not living up to your expectations, you needed to meet with the Parish Priest and talk to him about it. In all honesty and candor, charitably of course. You were offered a chance to share what you had discovered in your life and help make a difference in other people’s lives. Maybe go to a different Parish in your area. Even talk to the Bishop.

On a different subject, When you go into your personal interpretation about Paul and Peter and how that allegedly affects Apostolic Succession, you are making yourself an authority and under that assumed authority you are judging an entire Church - across the world and throughout the ages. That is a daunting expedition and it comes out as arrogant.

Where ever there is people, there will be bad people and good people and then there is the rest of us, swinging back and forth between the two :o. But we are still called to be holy and I don’t know about you, but I am not going down without a fight :D.

Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top